Mar-a-Lago is Under Siege
- Thread starter Lucy01
- Start date
It doesn't ? Just the way you stated it makes it sound very political to me with an election coming up in a few months.
There is always "an election coming up in a few months."
Which part? The investigation, the materials at Mar-a-Lago, and the missing phone records have all been widely reported.
It would be gross negligence to not look through those materials as part of the J6 investigation.
VanPastorMan
Hall of Famer
Isn't it the Law that the President is the one who classifies or declassifies documents? Also where have you heard this Mara Lago raid was about his taxes? Friend, did you listen to Trump's speech before the January 6 incident? Also these people who were unwise to enter the capital had the door opened for them. Where was the capital police? Why did they just open the door? I actually wonder why people on the Left don't answer these questions.
What am I worried about? It is the rule of law. I am worried when it looks like government agencies are being used to squash their perceived enemies. That is what happened at Mara Logo (or however you spell it) Ok, right now if nothing comes from this RAID will you admit that this was about politics. It was about trying to make sure Trump doesn't run again?
He was already told to return the documents. Trump is responsible for the repercussions
It is a bit of a loophole to say anything Trump takes automatically becomes declassified. Plus declassified documents are still supposed to be retained in the national archives.
Sounds like a perfect time to rush through a Supreme Court nomination...I can think of a few that should retire.
Plus, I have a feeling there would never be a proper time to confront your master
VanPastorMan
Hall of Famer
I do want a good answer from lawyers and others on here who care about the Law. My understanding is this Raid was done where Trump's lawyer could not be present. Was there a subpoena? What did it say they were there to look for? Do any of us truly even know what they were looking for? These are questions I ask because if they can do this to Trump then as I said in an earlier post they can do that to us? What about rights of the individual no matter who they are? Why weren't Trump's lawyers not allowed to be on the premises? There was a report I saw where they asked those at Mar-a- Lago to turn off the security cameras. Why would they do this and do they have a legal right to request or demand it?
What I think is so funny is the same people who are all over Trump about this (and I think he's guilty as hell) are the same people that were defending Hillary and her lack of judgement.
You can look at it that way. But the pressure on Garland from the left is for an actual investigation, not just to collect missing government property.
And DOJ has said it is closely monitoring the House Committee's investigation, where key gaps in the evidence (missing phone records at EOP, SS, HSA, & DOD) have come to light in the past few weeks. Seems more likely that drove the decision to seize the materials sooner rather than later.
The raid was approved by Trump appointed Wray and signed off by a judge (edited out inaccurate info).
So not sure how legitimacy can be questioned.
Last edited:
You are looking at it backwards from my point . he has been out of office 18 months and they wait until now?
Which is precisely why they decided to execute the raid to avoid that type of behavior.
They were already working on it for a while. Plus they gave Trump months to comply. If they had gone earlier, you would say they didn't give Trump enough time
Because the uproar was predictable and they needed a substantial enough reason?
Sounds like you've been reading some conspiracy theories.
Comical how ignorant people can be. He doesn’t need California but he wouldn’t have this platform without it, without the innovations of Intel, Google, Silicon Valley, and so on.
You’re quoting COH out of context. His context is strictly ranting to his lemmings and sycophants.
Especially for politicians like Mitch McConnell who campaign for the full six years of every six-year senate term they preside over.
I like the word "Raid" it sounds as if they were going in to get one of the most dangerous men alive. I envision a "Scarface" type of anticipated confrontation. The FBI in the words of my late gradfather "couldn't stop a hog in a ten foot alley" when it comes to real issues so they send 30+ armed agents to a 70+ year old mans residence.
Talk about being the laughing stalk of the world we just hit number 1.
The judge is an Obama donor, a Trump hater, and a low-life drifter, but good try.
Who Is Bruce Reinhart? Judge Who Approved FBI Mar-a-Lago Raid
The federal magistrate judge had previously donated to former President Barack Obama and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.
www.newsweek.com
The FBI is corrupt as hell, obviously. As is the Dept of Injustice. Not debatable points.
The judge is an Obama donor, a Trump hater, and a low-life drifter, but good try.
Who Is Bruce Reinhart? Judge Who Approved FBI Mar-a-Lago Raid
The federal magistrate judge had previously donated to former President Barack Obama and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.
Judge who OK’d Mar-a-Lago raid Obama donor once linked to Jeffrey Epstein
The Florida federal magistrate judge who signed off on a search warrant authorizing the FBI raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort donated to Barack Obama’s …
nypost.com
Once worked in the Public Integrity Section of the DOJ.......an oxymoron. Throw a stone and you hit one of these pieces of s***..Judge who OK’d Mar-a-Lago raid Obama donor once linked to Jeffrey Epstein
The Florida federal magistrate judge who signed off on a search warrant authorizing the FBI raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort donated to Barack Obama’s …
Any guesses on who the "rat" is from Trump world that flipped and provided the info to the FBI/DOJ?
"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"
Lavrently Beria , head of Stalin's secret police.
Also, the JD's guiding philosophy in it's political prosecutions.
