ADVERTISEMENT

Hunter Biden on trial

Oh hell, I'd bang my sister-in-law if she was available. Mainly just to say I did it.

What bothers me about Hunter is his - and Joe's - non-recognition of his child by the stripper. The little girl looks very sweet and it really bothers me she's growing up without a dad. That shouldn't happen to any child.

I can forgive a lot of the other stuff, but not that. And Joe's a POS for not recognizing her until the pressure got too great on him.
Can't argue with anything you said there. I think he got some pretty shitty advice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Hunter would have no reason to hide his stash in those cubbyholes used by visitors and the press.
and interns. They work long hours and have to pass through security multiple times a day. Once you get it in, you hide it.

Besides the only place Hunter hid blow was in his nose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Why would hunter be in the visitor/press area?

Michael J Fox Marty GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy
Those areas are not sealed off.
 
This is moronic. There is zero evidence that tiny bit of coke belonged to Hunter. Zero.
It wasn't Hunter's coke. One of my oldest friends is a secret service agent that worked at the white house at that time (prior to that he was with Ivanka and Jared's family). No DNA, No fingerprints, no hair samples, no nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
It wasn't Hunter's coke. One of my oldest friends is a secret service agent that worked at the white house at that time (prior to that he was with Ivanka and Jared's family). No DNA, No fingerprints, no hair samples, no nothing.

so a good theory might be that someone purposely planted it in order to frame Hunter and they couldn't get anywhere other than the visitor/press area.

Of course, all of this is irrelevant to his innocence or guilt in the trial.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
so a good theory might be that someone purposely planted it in order to frame Hunter and they couldn't get anywhere other than the visitor/press area.

Of course, all of this is irrelevant to his innocence or guilt in the trial.
No, that would be stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
No, that would be stupid.

Not a lot of reasons to wipe off fingerprints and then leave it at the white house. Taking the time to make sure it can't be traced back to the culprit seems to show that it wasn't left by accident.

I wouldn't put it past MAGA to plant it and then try to blow it up into being a major story.
 
Last edited:
I'm just curious, what does Hunter Biden have to do with the President?
I asked the same question when the media blasted the Bush daughters for partying. Who cares?
Bill carter? Who the hell cares--wish I still had my souvenir billy beer can.....
Roger Clinton? I couldn't care less.

Hunter is a moron and an easy target that suffers from an addiction......Hope he stays clean, but he's going to pay a price--fine by me.

Ted Cruz let Donald Trump call Cruz's wife ugly and Cruz didn't have the guts to do anything more than swallow....
Bill Clinton has no one left to lie to. His entire adult life has been spent lying. How many women did he destroy?

As stupid as Hunter was, and as destructive as he was, he appears to be owning up to his errors. If he goes to jail, fine by me, but I think he's more of a man than Cruz or Clinton
 
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anybody see hunter's dirty wife??? not bad!!!!!!!! 38. married in 2019!!!!!!!!! was he a crackhead then? after all his shit he still pulled that. pretty impressive to be honest
 
It wasn't Hunter's coke. One of my oldest friends is a secret service agent that worked at the white house at that time (prior to that he was with Ivanka and Jared's family). No DNA, No fingerprints, no hair samples, no nothing.
Hunter's dealer must have wised up. lol
 
So the Biden admin appointed Special Counsel is moving ahead with felony charges against Hunter for lying on the checkoff form when he bought a gun, claiming he wasn't a drug user.

Have at it.

Justice system is rigged right? Trump’s team has filed a motion that says the special counsel is unconstitutional but only in his case not in Hunter Biden’s case. Lol.
Biden’s attorneys are likely bringing this to trial to appeal the likely guilty verdict. Their calculation is that it will get overturned on appeal because Supreme Court Justice Barrett has previously questioned legality of the form he filled out. If it gets that far, they feel a gun toting Supreme Court will rule in their favor.
 
She sounds great:

"Friends of Cohen’s have told Page Six the South African beauty was in a long-term relationship with another man just weeks before the wedding."
This is funny. I like the guy in his 20s would drag his mattress in the living room and eat hooters wings and watch porn. But now that he’s in his 40s he puts on an audiobook and fires up farm simulator 🤣🤣

 
And just like that, the gun control people change their slogan. "We have to get the guns out of the hands of YOUR people. We weren't serious about our people"

Another Gem. The president isn't competent to stand trial. His son was in an altered state of mind so he can't be held responsible for his actions. Vanna, please spin the wheel so we can see what issue Pelosi has to beat insider trading.

I love now that we are back to good, acceptable politicians with real leadership abilities. whew, that was a close one.
 
And just like that, the gun control people change their slogan. "We have to get the guns out of the hands of YOUR people. We weren't serious about our people"

Another Gem. The president isn't competent to stand trial. His son was in an altered state of mind so he can't be held responsible for his actions. Vanna, please spin the wheel so we can see what issue Pelosi has to beat insider trading.

I love now that we are back to good, acceptable politicians with real leadership abilities. whew, that was a close one.
Hahahaha these Biden’s. One’s brain is too shot to stand trial and the other was too altered 🤣🤣
 
Not a lot of reasons to wipe off fingerprints and then leave it at the white house. Taking the time to make sure it can't be traced back to the culprit seems to show that it wasn't left by accident.

I wouldn't put it past MAGA to plant it and then try to blow it up into being a major story.
Watching the Magas last trial and you guys this trial is tremendous entertainment.
 
And just like that, the gun control people change their slogan. "We have to get the guns out of the hands of YOUR people. We weren't serious about our people"

Another Gem. The president isn't competent to stand trial. His son was in an altered state of mind so he can't be held responsible for his actions. Vanna, please spin the wheel so we can see what issue Pelosi has to beat insider trading.

I love now that we are back to good, acceptable politicians with real leadership abilities. whew, that was a close one.
Joe, who is crying about Hunter Biden being prosecuted for having illegally purchased a firearm? Is it the .085%.

Who said Biden isn't competent to stand trial? I'm literally staring at the Hurr report and at no point does it say that.

As to insider trading. Hmm. Richard Burr, Tom Coburn, Kelly Loeffler, David Perdue, John Hoeven, Greg Gianforte, Roger Marshall, etc.

In case you haven't figured it out by now, with few exceptions, there isn't one congressman/woman who hasn't figured out how easy it is to insider trade. Left/Right/Center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dr.jb
In case you haven't figured it out by now, with few exceptions, there isn't one congressman/woman who hasn't figured out how easy it is to insider trade. Left/Right/Center.
And then there's that gangster Martha Stewart.
 
And just like that, the gun control people change their slogan. "We have to get the guns out of the hands of YOUR people. We weren't serious about our people"

Another Gem. The president isn't competent to stand trial. His son was in an altered state of mind so he can't be held responsible for his actions. Vanna, please spin the wheel so we can see what issue Pelosi has to beat insider trading.

I love now that we are back to good, acceptable politicians with real leadership abilities. whew, that was a close one.

About "the altered state of mind".

Is this the defense, or is the argument for the defense about Hunter believing he was no longer addicted to alcohol or drugs after having completed an 11 day recovery program. He made this not addicted assertion when filling out a form to purchase a gun ?

Was Hunter lying, or did he actually believe he was no longer addicted ? Any program known to me stresses the idea that addiction is always present and absence is therefore required.

Hard for me to believe Hunter can convince anyone about his defense, if I understand his defense argument correctly.
 
About "the altered state of mind".

Is this the defense, or is the argument for the defense about Hunter believing he was no longer addicted to alcohol or drugs after having completed an 11 day recovery program. He made this not addicted assertion when filling out a form to purchase a gun ?

Was Hunter lying, or did he actually believe he was no longer addicted ? Any program known to me stresses the idea that addiction is always present and absence is therefore required.

Hard for me to believe Hunter can convince anyone about his defense, if I understand his defense argument correctly.
At least Hunter knows the charges filed against him.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Joe, who is crying about Hunter Biden being prosecuted for having illegally purchased a firearm? Is it the .085%.

Who said Biden isn't competent to stand trial? I'm literally staring at the Hurr report and at no point does it say that.

As to insider trading. Hmm. Richard Burr, Tom Coburn, Kelly Loeffler, David Perdue, John Hoeven, Greg Gianforte, Roger Marshall, etc.

In case you haven't figured it out by now, with few exceptions, there isn't one congressman/woman who hasn't figured out how easy it is to insider trade. Left/Right/Center.
Thank you, I’ve been trying to tell Murt that’s not what the report said for days.
 
Thank you, I’ve been trying to tell Murt that’s not what the report said for days.
oh my god you are insufferable. this is what it the special prosecutor found:
His report described the 81-year-old Democrat's memory as “hazy,” “poor” and having “significant limitations.” in light of his condition and how he would present as a feeble old man he elected not to prosecute. the same was never said about trump. hell he was hit with four at once.

no one said a competency hearing took place. and did you notice how hard doj is fighting to prevent the audio from coming out? wonder why.... has the super pac charged with preventing trump from getting elected where you get your news from opined on that yet?
 
Who said Biden isn't competent to stand trial? I'm literally staring at the Hurr report and at no point does it say that.
Correct. It's become a bullshit MAGA talking point that is repeated at least daily by a poster here.

Hur never said Biden was mentally unfit to stand trial. Such a determination requires a competency evaluation, and it would not preclude a prosecutor from bringing charges.

Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor and currently a law professor at Columbia, succinctly addresses the issue:

"The standard for competence to stand trial demands some recollection of events but looks as much to a defendant’s ability to consult with counsel and to understand the proceedings. The DOJ report does not offer the slightest basis for doubting Biden’s competence to stand trial, and in fact shows an interaction with investigators that would make any claim of incompetence frivolous. Hur’s focus on memory was primarily for the purpose of assessing and predicting how a jury would assess the evidence in the case.”
 
And just like that, the gun control people change their slogan. "We have to get the guns out of the hands of YOUR people. We weren't serious about our people"

Another Gem. The president isn't competent to stand trial. His son was in an altered state of mind so he can't be held responsible for his actions. Vanna, please spin the wheel so we can see what issue Pelosi has to beat insider trading.

I love now that we are back to good, acceptable politicians with real leadership abilities. whew, that was a close one.
and who has said that? closest you have is posters sarcastically defending hunter like MAGA defends trump.
 
oh my god you are insufferable. this is what it the special prosecutor found:
His report described the 81-year-old Democrat's memory as “hazy,” “poor” and having “significant limitations.” in light of his condition and how he would present as a feeble old man he elected not to prosecute. the same was never said about trump. hell he was hit with four at once.

no one said a competency hearing took place. and did you notice how hard doj is fighting to prevent the audio from coming out? wonder why.... has the super pac charged with preventing trump from getting elected where you get your news from opined on that yet?
You think anyone who disagrees with you is insufferable, in addition to being wrong. I quoted from what he said yesterday. Just as MM did above. No clue what you are talking about with the super pac and I get my news a multitude of places. Where did anyone mention or imply there was a competency test?
 
Correct. It's become a bullshit MAGA talking point that is repeated at least daily by a poster here.

Hur never said Biden was mentally unfit to stand trial. Such a determination requires a competency evaluation, and it would not preclude a prosecutor from bringing charges.

Daniel Richman, a former federal prosecutor and currently a law professor at Columbia, succinctly addresses the issue:

"The standard for competence to stand trial demands some recollection of events but looks as much to a defendant’s ability to consult with counsel and to understand the proceedings. The DOJ report does not offer the slightest basis for doubting Biden’s competence to stand trial, and in fact shows an interaction with investigators that would make any claim of incompetence frivolous. Hur’s focus on memory was primarily for the purpose of assessing and predicting how a jury would assess the evidence in the case.”
Yep. Posted much of that the other day. It won’t matter. They will continue using it.
 
You think anyone who disagrees with you is insufferable, in addition to being wrong. I quoted from what he said yesterday. Just as MM did above.
No you conflated significant limitations prosecutorial discretion and the competency standard.

I will agree people are loose with words and likely said he wasn’t competent or fit for trial whatever.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT