ADVERTISEMENT

Democrats caught stealing an election?

No its shoveitupyourbutt.com. Weve provided plenty of vids in court, vids out of court, interviews, and real journalists. You've provided nothing except propaganda. That was all figured out years ago in Germany during Hitler days and the dream team refuses to except a rerun.
Talk about oxygen deprivation.
 
Page 7. Dems expert could not match 11% of the ballots in the sample. Again about 10x Biden's margin of victory. And if you watch Pawn Stars you no inconclusive means the same person most certainly did not sign both.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Page 7. Dems expert could not match 11% of the ballots in the sample. Again about 10x Biden's margin of victory. And if you watch Pawn Stars you no inconclusive means the same person most certainly did not sign both.

Wow! That shows that the evidence and ruling does NOT support your allegations of voter fraud that could have changed the election results in Arizona. You live in Crazy World where evidence and facts don’t matter. It’s truly an amazing thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrBing
Page 7. Dems expert could not match 11% of the ballots in the sample. Again about 10x Biden's margin of victory. And if you watch Pawn Stars you no inconclusive means the same person most certainly did not sign both.

"Of the 100 envelope/affidavits reviewed, Plaintiff’s forensic document examiner found 6
signatures to be “inconclusive,” meaning she could not testify that the signature on the
envelope/affidavit matched the signature on file. She found no sign of forgery or simulation as to any of these ballots.
Defendants’ expert testified that 11 of the 100 envelopes were inconclusive, mostly
because there were insufficient specimens to which to compare them. He too found no sign of
forgery or simulation, and found no basis for rejecting any of the signatures.
"

I'm not in this argument but this has always been the reason that I think cheating goes on (from both sides). I assume they had "experts" examining the documents so if they found some inconclusive how can a layman working for the county decide what's a valid signature. People's signature changes over time.
 
Sounds like the only difference here is the offenders, and the candidate that benefitted from the offenses, aren't willing or able to bold face lie about it, and don't have millions of dumb ass lemmings to run interference for them while they do it.

I would be careful, if I were you, peeling back these layers. As one of the most unlikely things to happen in recent memory is 78 million people legally voting for Donald Trump. No one seems to talk about how that math doesn't add up. Thousands of people have spent 3 years now trying to find proof that there was enough fraud benefitting Biden, to change the results. Maybe its time to start looking in to some Trump votes? I suspect the margin was even wider than it ended up being. With him being the least liked candidate in history and all.
 
Sounds like the only difference here is the offenders, and the candidate that benefitted from the offenses, aren't willing or able to bold face lie about it, and don't have millions of dumb ass lemmings to run interference for them while they do it.

I would be careful, if I were you, peeling back these layers. As one of the most unlikely things to happen in recent memory is 78 million people legally voting for Donald Trump. No one seems to talk about how that math doesn't add up. Thousands of people have spent 3 years now trying to find proof that there was enough fraud benefitting Biden, to change the results. Maybe its time to start looking in to some Trump votes? I suspect the margin was even wider than it ended up being. With him being the least liked candidate in history and all.

giphy.gif
 
You're kind of skirting his point- par for the course...

If the "Biden votes" were phoney (I assume that's your point) there were plenty of votes for GOP candidates on the same ballot...So your contention is that people cheated to vote for Biden and voted for GOP candidates on the same ballot?

That is downright diabolical, and frankly a stupid move on their part. Why would they put votes for GOP candidates on fake ballots? Wouldn't they want to elect other Dems besides Biden?
Of course you can only see in straight ballot terms. That tracks…
 
Are you in dbm the same person? Both of you together could walk into an empty room and lower the room’s average IQ.
Says the guy who can't debate logically worth a crap and has to resort to name calling at every turn. You act and sound like a democrat who backs himself into a corner and screams RACIST! I've provided plenty of docs, video's, interviews, and hearings right from the horses mouth. Ignored by you and your TDS buddies. All good continue on. Enjoy a nice cigar tonight. :)
 
Absolutely amazing what a judge will act on…….. when the election case doesn’t involve Trump.
 
"Of the 100 envelope/affidavits reviewed, Plaintiff’s forensic document examiner found 6
signatures to be “inconclusive,” meaning she could not testify that the signature on the
envelope/affidavit matched the signature on file. She found no sign of forgery or simulation as to any of these ballots.
Defendants’ expert testified that 11 of the 100 envelopes were inconclusive, mostly
because there were insufficient specimens to which to compare them. He too found no sign of
forgery or simulation, and found no basis for rejecting any of the signatures.
"

I'm not in this argument but this has always been the reason that I think cheating goes on (from both sides). I assume they had "experts" examining the documents so if they found some inconclusive how can a layman working for the county decide what's a valid signature. People's signature changes over time.
That's why you randomly pull a sample of ballots from both sides ...say a 1000 mail ins that went to Trump and a 1000 that went to Biden. How many of those 2000 that don't match or are inconclusive are for Biden and how many for Trump? You would expect it to be around 50/50. It wouldn't be though.
 
Sounds like the only difference here is the offenders, and the candidate that benefitted from the offenses, aren't willing or able to bold face lie about it, and don't have millions of dumb ass lemmings to run interference for them while they do it.

I would be careful, if I were you, peeling back these layers. As one of the most unlikely things to happen in recent memory is 78 million people legally voting for Donald Trump. No one seems to talk about how that math doesn't add up. Thousands of people have spent 3 years now trying to find proof that there was enough fraud benefitting Biden, to change the results. Maybe its time to start looking in to some Trump votes? I suspect the margin was even wider than it ended up being. With him being the least liked candidate in history and all.
Have at it...
 
Says the guy who can't debate logically worth a crap and has to resort to name calling at every turn. You act and sound like a democrat who backs himself into a corner and screams RACIST! I've provided plenty of docs, video's, interviews, and hearings right from the horses mouth. Ignored by you and your TDS buddies. All good continue on. Enjoy a nice cigar tonight. :)
Why are you guys living in the past? Three years after the election you're still whining, stomping your feet and obsessed with the false notion that your guy won. He lost. Get over it and move on.

But here's the thing. You can't move on because Trump won't move on. You take your marching orders from him. He remains fixated on an election he lost and insists that everyone do the same. Despite what you may think, this is hardly some great cause you're supporting. This is a vanity thing and a solvency play for Trump, plain and simple.

No one likes to be called a loser but, for Trump, that's a label he can never accept. His father told him that's the worst thing anyone can be called and Trump took it to heart. Sadly for him, while he's had some great wins including the biggest win of all, the presidency, his life has been littered with losses. I'm still trying to figure out how someone can bankrupt casinos but Trump managed to pull that off. For a 10 year period, he was literally the biggest loser (financially) in the United States. He was a punch line and a laughingstock in the '90s but then he inherited a fortune and NBC came calling with The Apprentice and he was back in the con game again.

Now, not only is his wealth at risk again but so is his personal freedom. He's desperate for the presidency in order to: 1) remain solvent; and 2) stay out of jail. That's the extent of his vision. You're supporting it. Congratulations.
 
Let's pretend this is legit.

ALL the votes went just for Biden? LOL

How did GOP'ers win in districts Biden won? #gangsta #chessNotCheckers
You know its tiring trying to deal with you and yours. Its like spoon feeding a baby who constantly drools food...Its a link from the Pennsylvania house GOP. They certified the election and its obviously in error. It doesn't matter its not legit! Can you read?

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

Go dribble a basketball if you can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbmhoosier
Why are you guys living in the past? Three years after the election you're still whining, stomping your feet and obsessed with the false notion that your guy won. He lost. Get over it and move on.

But here's the thing. You can't move on because Trump won't move on. You take your marching orders from him. He remains fixated on an election he lost and insists that everyone do the same. Despite what you may think, this is hardly some great cause you're supporting. This is a vanity thing and a solvency play for Trump, plain and simple.

No one likes to be called a loser but, for Trump, that's a label he can never accept. His father told him that's the worst thing anyone can be called and Trump took it to heart. Sadly for him, while he's had some great wins including the biggest win of all, the presidency, his life has been littered with losses. I'm still trying to figure out how someone can bankrupt casinos but Trump managed to pull that off. For a 10 year period, he was literally the biggest loser (financially) in the United States. He was a punch line and a laughingstock in the '90s but then he inherited a fortune and NBC came calling with The Apprentice and he was back in the con game again.

Now, not only is his wealth at risk again but so is his personal freedom. He's desperate for the presidency in order to: 1) remain solvent; and 2) stay out of jail. That's the extent of his vision. You're supporting it. Congratulations.
Right on que... Because the past is coming up again right before our very eyes. Unless you are eating the lotus flowers and in a trance you would know that. Having trouble this morning with some facts from what happened. I understand. Its tough being part of a party who suppresses its opposition and acts authoritarian. Nothing to see here.
 
You know its tiring trying to deal with you and yours. Its like spoon feeding a baby who constantly drools food...Its a link from the Pennsylvania house GOP. They certified the election and its obviously in error. It doesn't matter its not legit! Can you read?

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

Go dribble a basketball if you can.
LOL

This is based on some 'statement' put out on a page with fancy letterhead?
 
Says the guy who can't debate logically worth a crap and has to resort to name calling at every turn. You act and sound like a democrat who backs himself into a corner and screams RACIST! I've provided plenty of docs, video's, interviews, and hearings right from the horses mouth. Ignored by you and your TDS buddies. All good continue on. Enjoy a nice cigar tonight. :)

So, you complain about name calling, and then the very next sentence call him a name.

Hypocrite much?
 
LOL

This is based on some 'statement' put out on a page with fancy letterhead?
It's like talking to a brick wall. That's all they ever provide. Some person parroting what they are saying. No proof. No witnesses. No phone records. No bank statements. We get statements like this and videos of some person moving a box. Because, you know, moving a box is a clear sign of cheatin.

Their is plenty of maga judges and lawyers. Not sure what they are waiting on with all the evidence these guys have. Lol.
 
Right on que... Because the past is coming up again right before our very eyes. Unless you are eating the lotus flowers and in a trance you would know that. Having trouble this morning with some facts from what happened. I understand. Its tough being part of a party who suppresses its opposition and acts authoritarian. Nothing to see here.
I’m “part of a party?” Funny. I’m not a Dem and never have been. I was a registered Republican for 20 years. I’m now Independent.
 
I’m “part of a party?” Funny. I’m not a Dem and never have been. I was a registered Republican for 20 years. I’m now Independent.
What are you thoughts on government spending overall? How about our current government spending and debt?
 
I'm still trying to figure out how someone can bankrupt casinos but Trump managed to pull that off
bad loans. didn't know what he was doing. but it ddidn't matter to him. he pulled out dough and didn't put much personal funds into it. in my provocative post on mitt romney i neglected to add his comment about using other people's $ to campaign. pretty gross. and i know that's the idea behind start ups as well but still
 
Keep your eyes on these dirty rotten snakes in the grass. Project Veritas blew the lid of these people years ago.

I’m sure they only cheat on off cycle municipal elections. Definitely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT