Trump is a total loser. I don't understand your devotion to him.
New year but same old obsession for you Forever Trumpers. You've resurrected an old thread with an absurd, self-serving social media post from your fallen idol.
It's not Darwinism or natural selection. Please don't misuse scientific terms to score political shots.
So basically there were fewer republicans alive to vote. Thus the red wave didn't happen.
Or some would call it Darwinism or natural selection.
It's not Darwinism it natural selection. Please don't misuse scientific terms to score political shots.
Guess he told you1
Stop being so pedantic or better still, get a life.
Some people here take themselves waaaay too seriously.Guess he told you1
Neither apply for a Chinese made virus though, do they?
So basically there were fewer republicans alive to vote. Thus the red wave didn't happen.
Or some would call it Darwinism or natural selection.
Why are we so easy to admit that it was "chinese" made? I'm thinking they may have only been the contract manufacturer hired by the US (Fauxi).Neither apply for a Chinese made virus though, do they?
First of all, you want me to stop being a pedant? How little attention have you been paying to make such a ridiculous request?
Stop being so pedantic or better still, get a life.
Have you thought of interviewing with Ken Nunn? I think he has a division that you could be a major player in.First of all, you want me to stop being a pedant? How little attention have you been paying to make such a ridiculous request?
Second, you hit my sweet spot. Political cheap shot combined with making light of death combined with bad science. Three things that all trigger me.
What dumb ass did your genetic component migrate from?There is a genetic component to intelligence, so when a lack of intelligence results in death where it was otherwise unlikely, and prior to the passing on of genetic material through the production of offspring, genetic drift indeed occurs to some extent within that population. Do we really "evolve" away from Trumpism in years? Of course not.
Stick to chemistry. That's not what genetic drift is.There is a genetic component to intelligence, so when a lack of intelligence results in death where it was otherwise unlikely, and prior to the passing on of genetic material through the production of offspring, genetic drift indeed occurs to some extent within that population. Do we really "evolve" away from Trumpism in years? Of course not.
You sure beat the odds on point #1 then.I am merely suggesting that...
1) if a large number of dumb people were to die early, before generating offspring;
2) if a large number of much smarter people were to live much longer, past child bearing years;
3) if intelligence is a heritable trait;
Then the subsequent generation may have a measurably higher level of average intelligence.
This isn't that complicated. Is it significant on short time scales? Likely not.
Yeah, but that's not what genetic drift is. I want you people to stop dropping scientific sounding buzzwords and thinking you're making a point. It was bad enough when CO.H started talking about non-linear systems, but at least that was so complicated and esoteric that everyone could rightly assume he was talking out his ass. Evolution is basic stuff. F*cking it up is like failing 9th grade biology.I am merely suggesting that...
1) if a large number of dumb people were to die early, before generating offspring;
2) if a large number of much smarter people were to live much longer, past child bearing years;
3) if intelligence is a heritable trait;
Then the subsequent generation may have a measurably higher level of average intelligence.
This isn't that complicated. Is it significant on short time scales? Likely not.
How would you apply this to the large number of young black men dying due to inner city violence? Is it as simple as them being dumb on a genetic level?There is a genetic component to intelligence, so when a lack of intelligence results in death where it was otherwise unlikely, and prior to the passing on of genetic material through the production of offspring, genetic drift indeed occurs to some extent within that population. Do we really "evolve" away from Trumpism in years? Of course not.
NY Dems are scared, ready to blame Eric Adams for everything:
Wow does that article not deliver. The headline and first paragraph kind of promise Adams is doing something bad or at least hypocritical.Documents reveal Eric Adams sent migrants to Florida, Texas and China
Between April 2022 and April 2023, the city spent around $50,000 on travel costs to resettle 114 migrant households around the country and globe.www.politico.com
Wow does that article not deliver. The headline and first paragraph kind of promise Adams is doing something bad or at least hypocritical.
Based on the facts related in the article, his office's "spin" is the only explanation that makes sense.Are you sure he isn't? Of course his office is going to spin things.
Based on the facts related in the article, his office's "spin" is the only explanation that makes sense.
The author covers NYC politics. I'm betting he's not an Adams fan (only because I'm guessing almost no one who covers NYC politics is an Adams fan).
Five bucks says he escaped the Midwest to live in the progressive utopia that is the Big Apple, and he has just been seething that a DINO like Adams became mayor.Just saw he’s a former Hoosier (state, not school).
Five bucks says he escaped the Midwest to live in the progressive utopia that is the Big Apple, and he has just been seething that a DINO like Adams became mayor.
I think he made the classic political mistake of thinking that getting elected meant that he could try out his ideas, instead of placating his supporters.Adams seems all over the place. It’s almost like he doesn’t want support from anyone.
I think he made the classic political mistake of thinking that getting elected meant that he could try out his ideas, instead of placating his supporters.
Especially hard for a guy like Adams, whose lane of likeability is like four people. Everyone (who talks loudly) in his city is either way too far to the left of him or a member of the other party.I admire that to a degree. There’s something noble about having individual thoughts, but often it’s a political nightmare as you noted (few exceptions like Lieberman).
Especially hard for a guy like Adams, whose lane of likeability is like four people. Everyone (who talks loudly) in his city is either way too far to the left of him or a member of the other party.
Good for him. I hope regular voters give him a chance. I still think the big players are going to keep hounding him.50% approval rating as of a month ago.
Mayor Eric Adams scores nearly 50% approval rating from NYC voters
Forty nine percent of registered voters in the city said they have a favorable opinion of Adams when asked by Siena College pollsters, in a new study released Tuesday.nypost.com
Especially hard for a guy like Adams, whose lane of likeability is like four people. Everyone (who talks loudly) in his city is either way too far to the left of him or a member of the other party.
Yeah that was painful.This isn’t helping his cause
Eric Adams Dragged A White Woman At A City Meeting, Compared Her To A Plantation Owner
On Wednesday, New York City Mayor Eric Adams participated in a “Talk with Eric” discussion at Gregorio Luperon High School for Science and Mathematics in Washington Heights. One person in the audience—an older white woman—took hold of the microphone that was being passed around and gave Adams a...www.yahoo.com
So unnecessary. Not even provoked.Yeah that was painful.