This didn't age well.Massive voter fraud.
Soon to be coming to a Federal courtroom near you.
You're as delusional as your crazy hero.
This didn't age well.Massive voter fraud.
Soon to be coming to a Federal courtroom near you.
I don't know what you think I said. But I provided links to show record numbers of registrations of 90 year olds, compared to previous elections.You originally said...
What I find interesting are the ballots that only voted for President. That, and the record number of registration of voters over 90 years of age
I saw that as you claiming that a record number of people over 90 had BEEN REGISTERED to vote,in the interim from 2016 and 2020. But what you're talking about is maintaining voter rolls, which is (IMHO) a completely different animal. I don't care about that particular issue at all, in fact, I think it's a joke that failure to vote (a RIGHT) for a certain number of elections can jeopardize your registration status.
I've had it happen to me before and it's a hassle. I can certainly see why for certain POC or minorities who had enough difficulty getting registered initially being removed from the rolls and having to endure the inconvenient process all over again could be daunting. Which is of course the reason it's such a hot button issue for the GOP, as it's a legal means to suppress (or attempt to suppress) the vote...
So I read the Jan 7, 2020 RCP article, but that's basically a year old and has no connection to the recent election. It talks about a failure to remove voters from the rolls, but basically says it's more of a "funding issue" than a partisan issue. Something tells me that "Judicial Watch" singling out primarily Dem counties in PA is not just a coincidence...
From the article...
"Partisan considerations aside, one factor in the sorry state of America’s voter rolls is the cost. Last year after Judicial Watch also threatened a federal lawsuit over Kentucky’s inability to keep accurate voter rolls, the office of Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes blamed a lack of “proper funding” and “budget shortfalls” for why the state had fallen behind.
The upshot is that after decades of neglect, hundreds of counties in this country have millions upon millions of inaccurate voter registrations – and the problem is widespread in Republican “red” and Democratic “blue” counties alike. "
Btw, the article also details problems in Orange Co, CA and I'm pretty sure that's an area controlled by Republicans which elected Republicans in 2020. In addition, the 5 states JW chose to sue comprised 11 counties of the 378 they determined were not in compliance...
This seems like a manufactured issue on your end anyway. As usual, the claims of "voter fraud are always directed towards only battleground states supposedly controlled by Dems, but both GA and AZ have Legislatures controlled by the GOP as well as Republican Governors.
And neither of those GOP Governors is moderate in the vein of a Holcomb or DeWine, as Ducey and Kemp are both pro-Trump and both appointed pro-Trump women to fill Senate seats with McSally and Loeffler... Btw neither of those appointments seemed favorable to the constituents they served. Loeffler is involved in a race she could well lose tomorrow, and McSally was initially rejected by AZ voters in 2018, then lost again in 2020 when she was forced to defend the seat she was appointed to.
And statistically don't most 90 yr olds tend to support Trump anyway? I mean pre-Covid Trump in 2016 and for most of his reign seemingly enjoyed a higher % of support among senior citizens. So are you claiming that after Covid hit and Trump's approval with seniors took a hit that Dems who seemingly would want to minimize Trump supporters 90+ yrs of age decided to reverse course and keep all those 90 yr olds on the rolls in hopes they would turn on Trump? That's basically how stupid most of these conspiracy theories surrounding "voter fraud" seem to me...
Aw, I'm sad that you're sad.LOL. "Triggered" is always where folks like you go when you have no answer.
Truth is I'm just saddened that you thought this was a serious avenue of inquiry. Americans should be better than that. You're not.
I don't know what you think I said. But I provided links to show record numbers of registrations of 90 year olds, compared to previous elections.
Maybe you missed them? If not, please review or, if you can't find them, I'll post them again.
I believe the Democrats claimed fraud in 2016 and it took a Special Prosecutor 2 1/2 years to prove it wrong.Many of us registered back in the ancient days of paper. Many of the paper forms did not include a birthdate option. When everything was computerized, states just input a generic date for all those people. They may well not be 90, they might be 60, but the system has no idea. https://www.detroitnews.com/story/n...life-into-false-dead-voter-claims/6243962002/
Tracy Wimmer, a spokesperson for Michigan’s secretary of state’s office, told The AP that on rare occasions a ballot received from a voter may be recorded as though that person is too old to be alive. This can occur when an incorrect birth year is entered on voter rolls.When the birthdate is entered, numbers could be accidentally flipped or simply mistyped, according to Tammy Patrick, a former Arizona election official who now works for the Democracy Fund, a foundation that works on voting issues.“Some states have a default ‘year of birth’ that they entered for registrations that lacked a year of birth on the old paper forms when voter registration was moved from paper to computer,” Roberts, the political science professor, explained in an email. “Those never get updated and as time goes on the voters with this issue look ‘older’ whether they are or not.”
We know that Trump repeatedly claimed rampant fraud in 2016. He formed a commission to look into it. They didn't find very much at all and quietly disbanded.
I believe the Democrats claimed fraud in 2016 and it took a Special Prosecutor 2 1/2 years to prove it wrong.
I know what I saw election night when there were reporters on the ground, interviewing election officials who weren't allowed anywhere near the tabulation tables. That's not even in doubt.I don't know if anyone said fraud. Some said collusion (you can look back, I said I did not believe collusion). We've had a lot of strange things from this election. Sharpiegate out in Arizona (turned out to be nothing). Dead people voting in Michigan (turned out to be living people with the same name), 200 year old people voting in PA (turned out to be 1800 was used as the birthdate for victims of domestic violence and the occasional key entry error), more people voting in some Michigan precincts than lived there (turned out the analysis used Michigan vote totals and Minnesota counties). We had a Trump lawyer claim no one from the campaign was allowed to watch the count in PA, then tried changing that when questioned by the judge to a "non-zero number" campaign officials were watching the counting. Clearly throwing everything against the wall is the strategy being used. I am sure the blame really falls to our lizard men overlords, the moon hoax, Obama's fake birth certificate, the round-earth conspiracy, the people who fabricated the Newtown shooting, and the government employees involved in carrying out 9/11.
Trump was the easiest target in history.
Why no negative coat-tails?
Republicans have 50 in the Senate already - likely 51, maybe 52 - which would be a zero gain or a -1 for Dems.
And in the House, the Dems are already down 8, with 5 still out and Republicans leading in 3 of those.
How could winning the White House from a 1-term Trump not produce better results in the Legisative branches?
This is NOT what was predicted.
So what gives?
And I saw the early vote count in Ohio with Biden up pretty big, then Trump came storming back and won the state. You know why I don't cry fraud? I understood that Ohio counted their mail-in votes first and then counted the election day voting. Just as you should understand that states like Pennsylvania counted their election day votes first then counted their mail-in votes (explaining the several hour delay of having to retrieve the mail-in votes that were kept locked up then transported to the counting facility). Wow, you can't be this stupid to understand how this election cycle worked. Didn't the news outlet you were watching fill you in that certain states allowed mail-in voting to be counted first, while other states couldn't start counting their mail-in votes until after the election day votes had been counted? Discrepancies occurred because our elections are run by the individual states with their own set of rules and regulations.I saw the counting stopped in the early morning and then, less that 5 hours later, hundreds of thousands of Democrat votes counted. Do you have an explanation for that?
Biden was being given 10s of thousands of votes when the count was released, with few or no Trump votes. Does that make sense to you, statisically?
Tell me how hundreds of thousands of votes can be counted when the vote counting is stopped.And I saw the early vote count in Ohio with Biden up pretty big, then Trump came storming back and won the state. You know why I don't cry fraud? I understood that Ohio counted their mail-in votes first and then counted the election day voting. Just as you should understand that states like Pennsylvania counted their election day votes first then counted their mail-in votes (explaining the several hour delay of having to retrieve the mail-in votes that were kept locked up then transported to the counting facility). Wow, you can't be this stupid to understand how this election cycle worked. Didn't the news outlet you were watching fill you in that certain states allowed mail-in voting to be counted first, while other states couldn't start counting their mail-in votes until after the election day votes had been counted? Discrepancies occurred because our elections are run by the individual states with their own set of rules and regulations.
I love how all of you arm chair republicans are screaming fraud, when none of the republicans who were on the front lines and in charge of their states election are claiming any irregularities.
Except that's not even remotely true, even allowing for hyperbole.In other swing states that counted mail-in votes after the polls closed on election day, every one went for Biden.
Then quit posting posts claiming you know what you're talking about.Just asked the question. I'd never heard of such a thing before.
I see the neighbor's 8 year old taught you how to 'selfie"..
It's not remotely true the other swing states went for Biden and they didn't count the mail-in votes until after the polls closed? Sorry, Unc, it's 100% right.Except that's not even remotely true, even allowing for hyperbole.
All those votes didn't go to Biden, though. A majority did, as expected.It's not remotely true the other swing states went for Biden and they didn't count the mail-in votes until after the polls closed? Sorry, Unc, it's 100% right.
Where did I say all the votes went to Biden. I said he took those states. Are you feeling OK, Unc?All those votes didn't go to Biden, though. A majority did, as expected.
I could have misinterpreted what you wrote. It could have been read a couple different ways.Where did I say all the votes went to Biden. I said he took those states. Are you feeling OK, Unc?
Let me try again: All the swing states that counted their mail-in votes as they came in went to Trump. All the swing states that started counting mail-in votes after the polls closed went to Biden.I could have misinterpreted what you wrote. It could have been read a couple different ways.
The “swing” states you’re referring to are Ohio and Florida and frankly Florida has increasingly been turning red, mainly from the Cubans who tend to vote republican, and Ohio has always been more red than blue. Now, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin are true swing states and Trump won all 3 of those in 2016 by a very narrow margin. In other words, it’s not at all a surprise how it went down. Georgia and AZ were the big surprises.Let me try again: All the swing states that counted their mail-in votes as they came in went to Trump. All the swing states that started counting mail-in votes after the polls closed went to Biden.
Make of it what you will.
Let me try again: All the swing states that counted their mail-in votes as they came in went to Trump. All the swing states that started counting mail-in votes after the polls closed went to Biden.
Make of it what you will.
Pennsylvania didn't. They weren't supposed to count votes that came in after Nov. 3, per the Pennsylvania legislation. The Court ruled it was OK. Even though election rules are determined by the legislature.I make it that all the state were following their rules.
The mail in votes were cast on time in every state. Make of it what you will.
Biden was ahead in the polls in Florida and Ohio. They were 'true swing states'.The “swing” states you’re referring to are Ohio and Florida and frankly Florida has increasingly been turning red, mainly from the Cubans who tend to vote republican, and Ohio has always been more red than blue. Now, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin are true swing states and Trump won all 3 of those in 2016 by a very narrow margin. In other words, it’s not at all a surprise how it went down. Georgia and AZ were the big surprises.
What do you make of it? I make nothing of it whatsoever.Let me try again: All the swing states that counted their mail-in votes as they came in went to Trump. All the swing states that started counting mail-in votes after the polls closed went to Biden.
Make of it what you will.
Pennsylvania didn't. They weren't supposed to count votes that came in after Nov. 3, per the Pennsylvania legislation. The Court ruled it was OK. Even though election rules are determined by the legislature.
Many instances in Atlanta of election monitors being blocked.
You have to be blind not to draw the obvious conclusion.
I know what I saw election night when there were reporters on the ground, interviewing election officials who weren't allowed anywhere near the tabulation tables. That's not even in doubt.
I saw the counting stopped in the early morning and then, less that 5 hours later, hundreds of thousands of Democrat votes counted. Do you have an explanation for that?
Biden was being given 10s of thousands of votes when the count was released, with few or no Trump votes. Does that make sense to you, statisically?
Go bed, little boy. You're obviously up way past your bedtime.Your stupidity and blind faith in everything trump is the only thing that doesn't make sense.
Go bed, little boy. You're obviously up way past your bedtime.
Come on, Ohio and Florida have had republican governors and senators for years. The other swing states all have democratic governors. Can a democrat even win a statewide election in Ohio or Florida?Biden was ahead in the polls in Florida and Ohio. They were 'true swing states'.
It's funny they were considered swing states before Trump won them.Come on, Ohio and Florida have had republican governors and senators for years. The other swing states all have democratic governors. Can a democrat even win a statewide election in Ohio or Florida?
It's funny they were considered swing states before Trump won them.
Not surprised you seem to know your way around a porn site.Naw, your mom got that pic of you from pornhub. It was in the scat category.
Easy to say after the fact. All the more reason to suspect states that delayed counting their mail-in ballots.![]()
'Ohio has taken a different turn': Ohio no longer appears to be a swing state
Ohio is an overwhelmingly white working-class state, and the Appalachian parts are even further right than they were four years ago, one analyst said.www.nbcnews.com
"I think that Ohio really isn't a representative of the whole country the way that it once was," said Mark Caleb Smith, a professor of political science at Cedarville University in Ohio.
"Ohio now is a much more red state than it is a purple state," Smith said. "If you look at recent elections, statewide, presidential or gubernatorial, Republicans have done extremely well. I just think that means Ohio has taken a different turn. I think Ohio has shifted a little bit, and it's no longer that middle part of the country — it's probably a little more on the right, traditional, conservative side."
Looking at recent articles, Floridians still consider it a swing state and I guess since Trump won by just 3.3% they might be right, but they currently have a Republican governor and both Senators are Republicans, so they seem pretty RED to me. Oh, and Trump won Ohio by 8%, so they're definitely not trending the swing state category.
Except as has been noted in numerous other threads,it was the GOP (and Trump in particular) who were determined to count mail votes last in each of those states. Can't have a "red mirage" to confuse folks if the mail votes are counted first and the Dems have an insurmountable lead on election night... From Sept 2020...Easy to say after the fact. All the more reason to suspect states that delayed counting their mail-in ballots.
Trump was the easiest target in history.
Why no negative coat-tails?
Republicans have 50 in the Senate already - likely 51, maybe 52 - which would be a zero gain or a -1 for Dems.
And in the House, the Dems are already down 8, with 5 still out and Republicans leading in 3 of those.
How could winning the White House from a 1-term Trump not produce better results in the Legisative branches?
This is NOT what was predicted.
So what gives?
BadlyTrump was the easiest target in history.
Why no negative coat-tails?
Republicans have 50 in the Senate already - likely 51, maybe 52 - which would be a zero gain or a -1 for Dems.
And in the House, the Dems are already down 8, with 5 still out and Republicans leading in 3 of those.
How could winning the White House from a 1-term Trump not produce better results in the Legisative branches?
This is NOT what was predicted.
So what gives?