This is a prime example of the dog chasing the car, finally catching the car and then being lost about what to do next...
Despite the fact that numerous GOP types (including current Committee Chairman Jim Jordan) refused to cooperate with the Jan 6 Committee and ignored Congressional subpoenas that were issued in that case, the current Oversight Committee (Comer Jordan et al) have decided to hypocritically issue "Congressional subpoenas" for "The Biden Crime Family". Specifically brother James and Hunter...
So let's be clear, a sitting member of Congress chose to ignore a lawful "Congressional Subpoena"? Yet now that SAME member of Congress is able to (with a straight face) turn around and demand that PRIVATE CITIZENS comply with the same type of legal subpoena which he himself has already ignored...
But never fear, as both James and Hunter have agreed to appear. Unfortunately for the Comer team, Hunter has called their bluff and agreed to give testimony before the Committee in a public, likely televised setting.You really can't blame him, as the Pubs have continued to lie and make out of context claims about what Devin Archer testified to.
You can't continue to selectively edit and lie about what Archer said, if Millions of people actually had heard him say that Joe was not involved with Hunter's business dealings. Archer said that often times Hunter would call Joe when Joe had no idea of exactly what Hunter's schedule was or if he was at a meeting, dinner etc...
Yet people who regularly watch Fox would swear that Archer claimed Joe did the calling because he wanted to discuss "business" with Hunter's companions that day. And the idea that Joe and Hunter mainly engaged in small talk (which Archer said) is a constant source of ridicule on Fox News.
And then there were the phoney whatsap screen captures. Or Byron Donalds standing up during a Committee meeting trying to pass off a fake conversation posted on his white board as what was actually said...
So there's no reason for Hunter to trust that his testimony will be reported accurately and completely unless he has witnesses, likely Millions that would tune in. And there is no justifiable reason for Comer to reject the idea of public testimony, unless he has something to hide or wants to continue to engage in subtrefuge.
It's the same reason Comer wouldn't allow Lev Parnas to testify before the OC, despite Lev writing a 10+ page letter offering to do just that. The only way Comer's crew can win,is if they control the narrative. That's your only recourse when the actual facts are not on your side...
And how about the public parading of the IRS agents on National TV? Yet several FBI and IRS agents (including their respective supervisors) who contradicted those 2 agents' testimony has not really seen the light of day? Comer and his pals have some lower info voters completely bamboozled, as long as they can control the narrative.
But even those folks have a low enough BS tolerance that if they hear and see testimony from witnesses with their own eyes that contradicts the lies they've been fed then they are going to start to question the folks they've put their trust in.
So do the MAGA Comittee clowns want the truth, or just to continue to push their own narrative. I have no idea what questions will be asked of Hunter and how he'll respond. But I know one thing I'd much rather be able to hear it with my own ears rather than trust that members of a MAGA controlled Committee who have already lied won't do it again.
I'm curious as to what possible objections to live testimony Trump fans on this board could legitimately argue in favor of? Just seems like something we could all agree on as essential when it comes to getting at the truth.
For some reason, that's not how the Magas see it. Ever wonder why Archer was never brought before the public to testify following his "deposition"? Yet that's the same level of cooperation the Maga types are putting forward here.
Let us interview you in secret and then we will "allow" you to testify in public. Providing of course we get everything we waant out of the secret deposition. You know, like what happened with Archer? LOL... If I'm Hunter either they let me tell my story in public, or I pull a Jordan and tell them to stick their subpoena, like he did to the Jan 6 Committee...
And I think it's missing from this video, but Maria was ranting on her show, and asked some GOP woman if they had been able to discover any example of Biden altering policy (as VP) in correlation with supposed bribes...The dim bulb Pub House member said :Not yet." But that's why we're investigating...
Now I would argue that a VP has very little to do with foreign policy. But even if that is not true, it seems as if the policies in place while Biden was VP are pretty well established from a historical perspective. So by now if you want to claim he was "bribed" to help China, you'd have been able to determine which of his VP moves "helped" China" And it's strange how the same folks who want to claim that Biden is Obama's puppet, somehow want us to believe the roles were reversed and Biden controlled Obama previously...
Despite the fact that numerous GOP types (including current Committee Chairman Jim Jordan) refused to cooperate with the Jan 6 Committee and ignored Congressional subpoenas that were issued in that case, the current Oversight Committee (Comer Jordan et al) have decided to hypocritically issue "Congressional subpoenas" for "The Biden Crime Family". Specifically brother James and Hunter...
So let's be clear, a sitting member of Congress chose to ignore a lawful "Congressional Subpoena"? Yet now that SAME member of Congress is able to (with a straight face) turn around and demand that PRIVATE CITIZENS comply with the same type of legal subpoena which he himself has already ignored...
But never fear, as both James and Hunter have agreed to appear. Unfortunately for the Comer team, Hunter has called their bluff and agreed to give testimony before the Committee in a public, likely televised setting.You really can't blame him, as the Pubs have continued to lie and make out of context claims about what Devin Archer testified to.
You can't continue to selectively edit and lie about what Archer said, if Millions of people actually had heard him say that Joe was not involved with Hunter's business dealings. Archer said that often times Hunter would call Joe when Joe had no idea of exactly what Hunter's schedule was or if he was at a meeting, dinner etc...
Yet people who regularly watch Fox would swear that Archer claimed Joe did the calling because he wanted to discuss "business" with Hunter's companions that day. And the idea that Joe and Hunter mainly engaged in small talk (which Archer said) is a constant source of ridicule on Fox News.
And then there were the phoney whatsap screen captures. Or Byron Donalds standing up during a Committee meeting trying to pass off a fake conversation posted on his white board as what was actually said...
So there's no reason for Hunter to trust that his testimony will be reported accurately and completely unless he has witnesses, likely Millions that would tune in. And there is no justifiable reason for Comer to reject the idea of public testimony, unless he has something to hide or wants to continue to engage in subtrefuge.
It's the same reason Comer wouldn't allow Lev Parnas to testify before the OC, despite Lev writing a 10+ page letter offering to do just that. The only way Comer's crew can win,is if they control the narrative. That's your only recourse when the actual facts are not on your side...
And how about the public parading of the IRS agents on National TV? Yet several FBI and IRS agents (including their respective supervisors) who contradicted those 2 agents' testimony has not really seen the light of day? Comer and his pals have some lower info voters completely bamboozled, as long as they can control the narrative.
But even those folks have a low enough BS tolerance that if they hear and see testimony from witnesses with their own eyes that contradicts the lies they've been fed then they are going to start to question the folks they've put their trust in.
So do the MAGA Comittee clowns want the truth, or just to continue to push their own narrative. I have no idea what questions will be asked of Hunter and how he'll respond. But I know one thing I'd much rather be able to hear it with my own ears rather than trust that members of a MAGA controlled Committee who have already lied won't do it again.
I'm curious as to what possible objections to live testimony Trump fans on this board could legitimately argue in favor of? Just seems like something we could all agree on as essential when it comes to getting at the truth.
For some reason, that's not how the Magas see it. Ever wonder why Archer was never brought before the public to testify following his "deposition"? Yet that's the same level of cooperation the Maga types are putting forward here.
Let us interview you in secret and then we will "allow" you to testify in public. Providing of course we get everything we waant out of the secret deposition. You know, like what happened with Archer? LOL... If I'm Hunter either they let me tell my story in public, or I pull a Jordan and tell them to stick their subpoena, like he did to the Jan 6 Committee...
And I think it's missing from this video, but Maria was ranting on her show, and asked some GOP woman if they had been able to discover any example of Biden altering policy (as VP) in correlation with supposed bribes...The dim bulb Pub House member said :Not yet." But that's why we're investigating...
Now I would argue that a VP has very little to do with foreign policy. But even if that is not true, it seems as if the policies in place while Biden was VP are pretty well established from a historical perspective. So by now if you want to claim he was "bribed" to help China, you'd have been able to determine which of his VP moves "helped" China" And it's strange how the same folks who want to claim that Biden is Obama's puppet, somehow want us to believe the roles were reversed and Biden controlled Obama previously...
Last edited:
