Do you think all rioters should be prosecuted?So you're good with prosecuting the J6 rioters? Or was ransacking the Capitol a peaceful expression of free speech?
Do you think all rioters should be prosecuted?So you're good with prosecuting the J6 rioters? Or was ransacking the Capitol a peaceful expression of free speech?
When the FBI identifies the 100 plus agents and CI's who were disguised as Trump supporters like your hero Ray Epps, I'll decide.So you're good with prosecuting the J6 rioters? Or was ransacking the Capitol a peaceful expression of free speech?
Will you accept lawfare when the sharp end of the spear is reversed?So you're good with prosecuting the J6 rioters? Or was ransacking the Capitol a peaceful expression of free speech?
He never answered my question to him if all protesters should be prosecuted.Will you accept lawfare when the sharp end of the spear is reversed?
When Trump fires Wray it will be interesting to see if the new Director can get the records or if the records are destroyed. Maybe the new AG can some folks in the FBI to prosecute.When the FBI identifies the 100 plus agents and CI's who were disguised as Trump supporters like your hero Ray Epps, I'll decide.
Of course not, but I like letting the courts decide criminal acts. If there’s evidence of criminality, a jury will decide that one way or another. I suppose “lawfare” is in the eyes of the beholder.You have a problem with people being held accountable for their actions?? What would you wish for, that criminal acts be ignored? Will you accept lawfare when the sharp end of the spear is reversed?
Well, except Comey is the one who decided charges wouldn't be filed against Hillary.Of course not, but I like letting the courts decide criminal acts. If there’s evidence of criminality, a jury will decide that one way or another. I suppose “lawfare” is in the eyes of the beholder.
Not really what we’re talking about, but I’ve always been disgusted by prosecutors who go forward with a prosecution after learning the person they charged couldn’t have committed the crime. Prosecutors that only care about winning, even if they know they’re trying to convict an innocent man.
I don't think the FBI decides that. It's DOJ. He recommended no charges be filed.Well, except Comey is the one who decided charges wouldn't be filed against Hillary.
How does that work? No grand jury. Nothing. Just Comey's decision.
It should be the DoJ. But they were AWOL and let Comey make the announcement.I don't think the FBI decides that. It's DOJ. He recommended no charges be filed.
This is what the mfkers dread. This is existential to them...When Trump fires Wray it will be interesting to see if the new Director can get the records or if the records are destroyed. Maybe the new AG can some folks in the FBI to prosecute.
It's long-standing DOJ policy not to make public announcements when closing investigations without prosecuting. Comey went off the reservation.It should be the DoJ. But they were AWOL and let Comey make the announcement.
Only morons think Ray Epps was a Fed or CI. They do NOT prosecute and convict Feds or CIs for doing their jobs. How can you not understand this fact? He was a MAGA and you MAGA shits have turned on your brother. It’s truly shameful.When the FBI identifies the 100 plus agents and CI's who were disguised as Trump supporters like your hero Ray Epps, I'll decide.
What would the crime be. I’m serious, I do not understand this conspiracy theory at all. What are the basics?When Trump fires Wray it will be interesting to see if the new Director can get the records or if the records are destroyed. Maybe the new AG can some folks in the FBI to prosecute.
And he was punished by the DoJ for it, wasn't he?It's long-standing DOJ policy not to make public announcements when closing investigations without prosecuting. Comey went off the reservation.
What are you talking about? His public statement hurt Clinton, not Trump.And he was punished by the DoJ for it, wasn't he?
Wasn't he? Hmmmm...... maybe not. He could operate with impunity and he knew it, because the DoJ was actively working against the Trump campaign and, later, his Presidency.
What?And he was punished by the DoJ for it, wasn't he?
Wasn't he? Hmmmm...... maybe not. He could operate with impunity and he knew it, because the DoJ was actively working against the Trump campaign and, later, his Presidency.
You can't be serious. Not charging Clinton got her off the hook so she could presumably beat Trump.What are you talking about? His public statement hurt Clinton, not Trump.
His public statement damaged her. He was supposed to just quietly close the case and say nothing. Instead he basically publicly said that she was wrong and irresponsible, but not quite bad enough to justify charging her with a crime. In fact, about a week after he made the announcement, Trump began closing the gap in the polls. Within two weeks, they were virtually tied. Some of that was a convention bump for Trump, but the gap began narrowing several days before the convention began.You can't be serious. Not charging Clinton got her off the hook so she could presumably beat Trump.
It's so obvious, even you should be able to see it.
The fact it didn't work doesn't change the fact that this was a class A coverup by the DoJ for the sole purpose of beating Trump.
Trump faces charges for possessing classified documents while Clinton is let go after destroying classified documents in her possesion. Trump's case isn't nearly as serious as Clinton willfully destroying classified documents.
You are unbelievably stupid. Every email with classified information in them on HRC’s server was recovered. All 11 of them. It was negligence. Trump had 300 and he deliberately took them and illegally tried to keep them. You are a total hypocrite and a liar.You can't be serious. Not charging Clinton got her off the hook so she could presumably beat Trump.
It's so obvious, even you should be able to see it.
The fact it didn't work doesn't change the fact that this was a class A coverup by the DoJ for the sole purpose of beating Trump.
Trump faces charges for possessing classified documents while Clinton is let go after destroying classified documents in her possesion. Trump's case isn't nearly as serious as Clinton willfully destroying classified documents.