A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
In that case, you can't say anyone in the history of any social media sites were banned for their political beliefs...because their posts disappeared...
Your reasoning is wild
Musk/Twitter Document Dump
- Thread starter stollcpa
- Start date
Your reasoning is wild
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Probably. But he explained why he recommended voting GOP. He prefers balances - and so do I.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Jesus. What a dumbass post. Keep on pretending they don’t exist.Who is Antifa? Can you point out the "Antifa candidates" who ran for office in 2022? Cause the Proud Boys and oath keeper types have integrated themselves into the inner workings of the GOP in multiple states.
How the Proud Boys gripped the Miami-Dade Republican Party - The Boston Globe
The concerted effort by the Proud Boys to join the leadership of the party has destabilized and dramatically reshaped the Miami-Dade Republican Party that former Governor Jeb Bush and others built into a powerhouse nearly four decades ago.www.bostonglobe.com
Proud Boy, Michael Flynn Elected to a GOP Executive Committee in Florida
The far-right street-fighting gang has been making inroads into local politics ever since coming under scrutiny for their role in the January 6 riot.www.vice.com
‘Proud Boys’ Acolyte Tapped by Michigan County to Train Poll Workers
www.bloomberg.com
Republican U.S. Senate hopeful Barnette marched alongside Proud Boys on Jan. 6, report says
Republican U.S. Senate candidate Kathy Barnette, a conservative commentator who has surged into contention ahead of Tuesday's primary election in Pennsylvania, was photographed marching toward the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, alongside members of the far-right Proud Boys group, according to...www.reuters.com
MAGA Candidate Who Claims He's Not a QAnon Follower Once Said 'I Believe in Everything' Q Has Released
J.R. Majewski, a GOP nominee for Congress in Ohio, professed a belief in QAnon despite claiming he was never followed the conspiracy theory.www.rollingstone.com
Even in the only 2 states where there is an actual Antifa presence (WA and OR) it was still right wing extremists (like Joe Kent) who were on the ballot
Links to extremism moving out of the shadows in these Republican primaries
A challenger to a Republican House incumbent who attracted Trump allies’ ire in the second Trump impeachment has courted white nationalists and labeled...www.marketwatch.com
It was cited in Taibbi's tweets. Not sure what's ironic about it. The point is there wasn't anything new in there other than some tweets were pulled. I don't think a non-governmental platform censoring content reaches the level of scandal, let alone free speech.
The real news should be whether or not there is a connection to what Hunter Biden did, if it was wrong, and Joe Biden pulling governmental strings for him. BTW...making requests isn't against the law.
And 'go back to the basketball board' was so adept. Let's pretend you have an understanding of what we're talking about here. Now what?
Which government entity is impeding your freedom of speech?
When you find gas lighting as the last tactic of those you are debating, it is usually best to just disengage. You aren't involved in an honest conversation at that point.
So the New York Post's story was all the Twitter thread was about (it wasn't) and it just rehashed what we already know (a story we all claimed was a Russian Intelligence Op and supported being blocked).
Also, groups that hold a certain ideology, express that ideology the same way, dress the same, share the same symbolism, and proof of an international group that claims all of the same under a specific name doesn't really exist.
There is no point in debating people who do this kind of junk. They wear you down just debating verifiable facts before you can even get to the real point.
So the New York Post's story was all the Twitter thread was about (it wasn't) and it just rehashed what we already know (a story we all claimed was a Russian Intelligence Op and supported being blocked).
Also, groups that hold a certain ideology, express that ideology the same way, dress the same, share the same symbolism, and proof of an international group that claims all of the same under a specific name doesn't really exist.
There is no point in debating people who do this kind of junk. They wear you down just debating verifiable facts before you can even get to the real point.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Yea, pretty much my view of conservatives on this board given all of the unproven conspiracies and bs they post on this board.
You should just copy and paste one word as your responses. That is basically all they amount to anyway.
I’d still like to actually see the laptop. Who has it? What about all the hard drive copies that Rudy has?
People are stupid. You're being naive if you believe idiots aren't influenced by these idiot celebrities, imo. But I get your point and hope you are right.
Why, exactly? What about what others are seeing with their own eyes? If this "tech" didn't know how to retrieve files "properly", he certainly couldn't be expected to put fake info on the hard drive.
You guys are clearly searching for excuses here. Whatever helps you sleep at night. You're welcome to bury your head in the sand if you'd like, it's your life. But you are losing credibility quickly with this line of reasoning.
Well, no one has disputed his claims - not even the FBI, which had the laptop for 10 months before the 2020 election.
And if there’s one thing republicans can’t stand, it’s when a SOS running for governor runs the election they’re in.
WATCH: Biden Spox Says White House ‘Keeping a Close Eye On’ Elon Musk’s Twitter For Action on Hate and Misinformation
Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters the administration is "keeping a close eye on" Twitter during Elon Musk's tenure for action on misinformation and hate.
www.mediaite.com
It's the most incredible thing about this. 3 fvcking years! And they knew the laptop was Hunter's 10 months before the election, yet didn't dispute all 51 'former government Intelligence' experts claim that it was Russian disinformation.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Clapper and Brennan and their buds should all be playing chess in Leavenworth.
There are people in this thread claiming it hasn’t been proven that the laptop was Hunter Bidens.
Lol.
Opinion | Twitter’s Duty to Protect Free Speech
Censorship of the Hunter Biden story might have helped my party, but it was bad for our democracy.
www.wsj.com
Bravo Ro Khanna
And the ones that know claim it's no big deal. Because, at the core, if it helped defeat Trump, it was justified in their minds. That's why this will not go anywhere - the media has convinced themselves it's all justified.
Nice of him to wait until now to say it.
Opinion | Twitter’s Duty to Protect Free Speech
Censorship of the Hunter Biden story might have helped my party, but it was bad for our democracy.
Bravo Ro Khanna
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
There are people on this forum that claim Trump didn't collude with Russia.
And yet there is more proof of that then anything we have seen on Hunter's laptop.
Has the FBI released the contents of the computer?
You may be correct, you may be wrong.
If and until the content are disclosed everything is conjecture.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Dumber than ever. Mueller found no collusion. We can agree he obstructed. Words matter, Grover.
You should really consider your standing on this forum. You bring very little to the table and you think you’re the smartest man alive - or at least smarter than all the conservatives. Hint: You’re Not.
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.
I’m really not sure why you respond to that guy. I stopped awhile ago.Dumber than ever. Mueller found no collusion. We can agree he obstructed. Words matter, Grover.
You should really consider your standing on this forum. You bring very little to the table and you think you’re the smartest man alive - or at least smarter than all the conservatives. Hint: You’re Not.
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.www.americanbar.org
There’s no point. Everything he posts is some derivative of the same thing, if not an outright lie like the post you quoted.
