Why would I explain this? Why would I care what a snot nosed college Trumpster Twitter Twit posts?This is gonna be an absolute shit show. Can't wait to hear Aloha's explanation for all this.
Why would I explain this? Why would I care what a snot nosed college Trumpster Twitter Twit posts?This is gonna be an absolute shit show. Can't wait to hear Aloha's explanation for all this.
Stupid people aren't clever. Your post is Exhibit A.So true.
Do you think the DOJ under Trump would have gone after Biden? What would do if you were in Biden's shoes?Oh my God, you're dense. Biden is making excuses for pardoning his son, so he claims Hunter is being prosecuted because of politics. Well, whose DoJ is it?
You're right - it makes no sense. But yet, you blame a future Trump DoJ?
Sorry, I can't dumb it down any further for you. Have someone else explain it to you.
Fair enough. I do think this was also at least a little bit pre-emptive. It's not like the DoJ under Trump would have taken their foot off the pedal. I still think that played into account.“No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong,” President Biden Biden said in a statement.
Issue a sweeping, unprecedented pardon that predates the actions that gave rise to his indictments and convictions in an effort to insulate the big guy and anyone else in his circle potentially implicatedDo you think the DOJ under Trump would have gone after Biden? What would do if you were in Biden's shoes?
Don't engage him. It's like trying to debate a See-N-Say.Stupid people aren't clever. Your post is Exhibit A.
“No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong,” President Biden Biden said in a statement.
'Gone after'? Define that. Would they have continued an investigation if that's where the facts led? Of course.Do you think the DOJ under Trump would have gone after Biden? What would do if you were in Biden's shoes?
No one is above the law, right?The entire statement explains it further, that tax evaders who pay the back taxes and penalties and interest are rarely if ever criminally charged, nor are those who dishonestly check off a box on the gun check form.
Statement from President Joe Biden | The White House
Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and Iwww.whitehouse.gov
Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.
So, he IS saying his own DOJ was weaponized to target Hunter Biden.The entire statement explains it further, that tax evaders who pay the back taxes and penalties and interest are rarely if ever criminally charged, nor are those who dishonestly check off a box on the gun check form.
Statement from President Joe Biden | The White House
Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and Iwww.whitehouse.gov
Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.
He lies every time his mouth moves. Everyone knows what’s up. He said that never expecting trump to win and fully expecting a no time sentence or a Harris pardon to which he could claim plausible deniability. Either way in his mind hunter wouldn’t do timeSo, he IS saying his own DOJ was weaponized to target Hunter Biden.
That didn't come from the media.No one is above the law, right?
You have no idea how many are, or are not, criminally charged. So quit parroting the media.
Like people that exaggerate real estate valuations? 🤣🤣🤣The entire statement explains it further, that tax evaders who pay the back taxes and penalties and interest are rarely if ever criminally charged, nor are those who dishonestly check off a box on the gun check form.
Statement from President Joe Biden | The White House
Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and Iwww.whitehouse.gov
Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.
It absolutely didThat didn't come from the media.
You’re the biggest dupe I’ve ever seen.
The judge in the case disagrees:The entire statement explains it further, that tax evaders who pay the back taxes and penalties and interest are rarely if ever criminally charged, nor are those who dishonestly check off a box on the gun check form.
Statement from President Joe Biden | The White House
Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and Iwww.whitehouse.gov
Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.
Do we actually believe this guy was cognizant enough to write a pardon?Issue a sweeping, unprecedented pardon that predates the actions that gave rise to his indictments and convictions in an effort to insulate the big guy and anyone else in his circle potentially implicated
There's a case to be made that Obamacare flattened the cost increases in healthcare. Personally, I don't think it tells the whole story (it's based on the assumption that we consume healthcare the same as we did before). But, leaving that aside, there's an argument to be made.
And I have a slew of issues with the pre-existing conditions provision. I think it's one of those things where the impression is that public policy made a bugaboo for all of us go away by putting the screws to the insurers and providers who had been putting the screws to all of us. The reality is, there are no solutions...there are only tradeoffs. And the coverage of pre-existing conditions is pretty obviously a cost item that insurers simply have to account for, which they pass along to all of us.
I don't necessarily have a problem with them requiring coverage of pre-existing conditions. But the entire thing should be transparent as to how those costs are incurred and distributed. Because (a) they are, and (b) most people skip over that part
I'd love to hear what your point is with this.
I'd love to hear what your point is with this.
I'd love to hear what your point is with this.
Need to go to single payer?
I've become so cynical about this place I thought you were going somewhere else. Apologies.Healthcare administration costs are out of control and clearly a significant driver of our systems excess compared to others.
We’ve discussed this before and I’ve posted similar research from Athena.
Number of healthcare administrators is rising
Healthcare bureaucracy has exploded since 1970. Here's what that means for the industry, and how healthcare administrators can help relieve burnout.www.athenahealth.com
I've become so cynical about this place I thought you were going somewhere else. Apologies.
It's a perfectly fair argument to make. Absolutely.
My gripe is not with that argument. My gripe is with the rhetorical sleight of hand -- and it's hardly unique to the issue of pre-existing conditions. In fact, it's the very same sleight of hand that has been used to defend "forgiving" student loans.
And here's what it is: the arguments in favor of these things completely ignore the other side of the ledger. They are deliberately made without any kind of sense as to what doing it costs anybody. In fact, I'd say it's even worse than that: I think a clear message is that there is no cost...it's all benefit. At best, its cost is presented as being shouldered by somebody else.
A loan cannot be forgiven. A loan can either be paid back, along with its accumulated burden, or it can be assumed, in whole or in part, by its lender. But the people who promote "forgiving" student loans not only leave out the part that taxpayers have to assume the debts, I've literally seen people argue that it won't cost taxpayers a dime.
Similarly, insurance can be made to cover pre-existing conditions. But what does that cost -- and who bears that cost?