Doesn't that just incentivize single motherhood?
Doesn't that just incentivize single motherhood?
It incentivizes wearing a rubber.Doesn't that just incentivize single motherhood?
Rubbers suck.It incentivizes wearing a rubber.
Fine, but you're also incentivizing women to get divorced. They get full support of themselves AND the child no matter what?It incentivizes wearing a rubber.
yeah that's insane. incentivizing getting knocked up period. financial boonFine, but you're also incentivizing women to get divorced. They get full support of themselves AND the child no matter what?
I mean those kids have parents willing to help them out. For many that same story ends very differently.Here’s a rough one. A good buddy of mine’s daughter got knocked up before senior year of high school. They weren’t even seriously dating etc. she still went away to college. The boy went away to another college. And my buddy and his wife have the baby here
You're only looking at it from your point of view. 93% of all abortions happen before week 13. Why would conservatives agree to a constitutional amendment that allows almost all abortions to still take place? They would gain nothing.
They're a sin, anyway.It incentivizes wearing a rubber.
Let’s fix this problem….forced marriage until the kids are 18.Fine, but you're also incentivizing women to get divorced. They get full support of themselves AND the child no matter what?
Let’s fix this problem….forced marriage until the kids are 18.
Yup…get er done by 22…free and clear by 40 for cougar season.
Great idea but the left will never agree. To them if the “thing” in her belly is an inconvenience the last day before birth, they want the right to kill it.Craze and SC, you both make compelling arguments.
Nevertheless, states rights and each state having its own laws on such a divided and personal issue as abortion doesn't make sense to me in a country with a mobile population.
My suggestion to reach a national consensus on this issue is to pass a Constitutional Amendment granting personhood to the unborn at say 15 weeks.
Great idea but the left will never agree. To them if the “thing” in her belly is an inconvenience the last day before birth, they want the right to kill it.
Dang, now I am Danc? 😂DANC, you are right when you bring up the emotional and scientific importance of what you call "the thing", or "the baby", during the various steps of the pregnancy process.
Dang, now I am Danc? 😂
Danc a great guy. He likes to give dems a hard time. Me and Danc don’t post with your smoothness.Stoll, glad you took my mistake with a chuckle when mixing you up with our good friend Danc.
Two on the Mount Rushmore of quality posters in stoll and DANCStoll, glad you took my mistake with a chuckle when mixing you up with our good friend Danc.
Two on the Mount Rushmore of quality posters in stoll and DANC
Quite a few worthy but if you’re going to start the discussion you can start with DANC and stollWho's the other two?
Who's the other two?
Quite a few worthy but if you’re going to start the discussion you can start with DANC and stoll
Nominate MM66, who like Teddy Roosevelt carries a big stick.
You started the discussion of who else is on it.I didn't start it, you did.
I just asked who else was on it.
You started the discussion of who else is on it.
People have kicked around instituting a national sales tax on top of state. Get rid of income irs etc. it’s a fascinating topic. I don’t know enough about Econ to have a strong opinion but would like to hear from others
People have kicked around instituting a national sales tax on top of state. Get rid of income irs etc. it’s a fascinating topic. I don’t know enough about Econ to have a strong opinion but would like to hear from others
What is, “Things Trump says to arouse his base but has no intention of really doing”.
I think it would screw the poorCanada relies a lot on VAT, both national and provincial. I'm not sure about the details, but there's a rebate back to those who qualify to offset the regressive nature of such a tax.