"The media deliberately ignored the
opportunity to explain to the public what Jim Crow laws really were about and provide some useful information about the new Georgia law for public consumption. But nooooo. Protecting Biden was more important. In the long term good race relations, trust in government, trust in the media, and admiration of MLB all took an irreparable hit."
So I doubt if this is the type of "useful information for public consumption" you were referencing...
"The Georgia law had “eight key provisions that Heritage recommended,” Jessica Anderson, the executive director of Heritage Action for America, a sister organization of the Heritage Foundation, told the foundation’s donors at an April 22 gathering in Tucson, in a recording obtained by the watchdog group
Documented and shared with
Mother Jones. Those included
policies severely restricting mail ballot drop boxes, preventing election officials from sending absentee ballot request forms to voters, making it easier for partisan workers to monitor the polls, preventing the collection of mail ballots, and restricting the ability of counties to accept donations from nonprofit groups seeking to aid in election administration."
“We did it quickly and we did it quietly,” said the executive director of Heritage Action.
www.motherjones.com
Those are basically the opposite of the successful measures both Dems and Pubs agree with in Colorado, which is from what I read a bellweather for encouraging electoral Participation? So why should GA Pubs enact measures that only benefit GA Pub voters?
More from your post...
"More likely it was focused-grouped dishonesty created by his speech writers. In any event it was amplified by a media that was driven by an agenda instead of honest and factual reporting."
Well, I guess that is not quite comparable to Heritage Action BRAGGING about writing the bills and making them appear as "grassroots efforts"...
Evidently, someone's lying...
A leader of a lobbying group said the organization helped draft Iowa's elections bill. The bill's co-author called that a "bold-faced lie."
iowacapitaldispatch.com
I'm still curious as to what "problem" you think the GA law addressed, and what benefits it provides.?IMHO, Trump voters distrusting the system because Trump has whined about the system prior to both elections which featured him running for office is an ARTIFICIAL (Trump made) problem...
Not sure being stupid enough to believe it when Trump claims "the only way I can lose is if they cheat" qualifies as anything more than Terminal Stupidity...Certainly not a problem that requires normal people to sacrifice to appease morons.
He already lost the popular vote in 2016 by almost 3 Million and he never even approached 50% popularity. That was an election when a lot of Dems didn't vote, so when he is even less popular 4 yrs later why is it unreasonable to admit he could EASILY lose. Why is an extremely UNPOPULAR candidate getting his butt whipped an "urgent crisis" that his party feels the need to address by Legislatively making it harder to vote?
It's hard for me to muster much support for people who swallow conspiracy theories, and then claim those problems (which only they adhere to) need to be remedied...