I guess you could make arguments about the current versions of the NAACP and ACLU (they'd be wrong, but you could make them), but not sure how you can, in any world, justify including these:***
"Claremont lists 3M pledging a whopping $50 million to “BLM.” But the cited
document, published in September 2020, appears to be
mainly focused on supporting STEM learning in Black communities. It’s a pledge of $50 million over 5 years and lists $6 million in initial investments. That $6 million consisted of $5 million to the United Negro College Fund for work in St. Paul, Minnesota"
. . .
"Next up is Chevron, which Claremont reports pledged $15 million to “BLM.”
What does the actual cited
document say? That $15 million went to
$7 million in grants to historically Black colleges and universities; $1 million to the Executive Leadership Council; $5.1 million in grants to three foundations supporting k-12 education; $2 million to the United Negro College Fund; $1.6 million to the Thurgood Marshall College Fund and $1 million to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture."
***I didn't think this needed to be stated, but to ensure I "ought" not be "condenmed," I have not personally vetted the numbers or underlying documents cited in Goat's article.