Potter was the better banker. Dude made money hand over fist!Not what. Who.
George Bailey.
Yeah, but did he have a hot babe waiting for him at home?Potter was the better banker. Dude made money hand over fist!
Dude, having the hooker come to your house is a rookie mistake.Yeah, but did he have a hot babe waiting for him at home?
Nope, he was like McMurtry. Didn't even want sex anymore. Just cared about money and power.Yeah, but did he have a hot babe waiting for him at home?
Yeah, but did he have a hot babe waiting for him at home?
Has the FDIC yet become the official receiver for that bank?It won't matter in the end regarding the underlying debt, but you might ask the bank asking her to pay to produce the note. That way you can have some assurance that someone else won't make the same claim later. Like I said it won't matter for the actual debt (the purchasing bank can just use a lost note affidavit to prove it's the owner), but it may preclude other claims. At least she can show diligence in paying a fraudster, if it comes to that . . . .
And the honest, solvent borrowers among his clientele.Not what. Who.
George Bailey.
Damn, Brad. You're a hell of a researcher.
Mrs. Bailey.Damn, Brad. You're a hell of a researcher.
Even colorization would not ruin that image. Who is it and what movie? (A friend wants to know.)
Not sure the Hays Code did much good.
![]()
Hays Code - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Here's one back at you:
![]()
Jeez, I found out yesterday a guy we know is on the board of directors of svb. They do not need a bailout. They are filthy stinking rich New Yorkers.
Unreal
He was a high school hot-shot. Pretty risque film for the time, with Mary getting naked in the shrubbery and all.Geroge Bailey was arrogant. There I said it.
No, he was actually one of the few truly qualified guys to be in there. He married a girl that grew up down the street from me. She's an IU grad.One of the gay guys?
That was Donna Reed. Used to watch the Donna Reed Show all the time as a kid.Damn, Brad. You're a hell of a researcher.
Even colorization would not ruin that image. Who is it and what movie? (A friend wants to know.)
Not sure the Hays Code did much good.
![]()
Hays Code - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Here's one back at you:
![]()
Evidently he didn't have much influence. Assuming he truly was truly qualified.No, he was actually one of the few truly qualified guys to be in there. He married a girl that grew up down the street from me. She's an IU grad.
The guys got 30 years in investment banking and was at Barclays forever as a CEO in investment banking. He's very highly respected.Evidently he didn't have much influence. Assuming he truly was truly qualified.
Good post per usual. You have things under control in this thread? Joe’s handling the screwed up Dems thread and DANC has the stick a fork in Desantis thread covered. Hoops and jet should be here shortly for support/back up. Dbm is doing research.The guys got 30 years in investment banking and was at Barclays forever as a CEO in investment banking. He's very highly respected.
I'm sure do to the fact that he was normal and married the way people are supposed to be married male and female that nobody prolly gave him the time of day at that diversified clown show.
And here we are!
Very Funny...I still can't believe these guys are getting bailed...WTF. Thats like the biggest F-U to everyone who has lost in an investment in history.Good post per usual. You have things under control in this thread? Joe’s handling the screwed up Dems thread and DANC has the stick a fork in Desantis thread covered. Hoops and jet should be here shortly for support/back up. Dbm is doing research.
I don’t know anything about banks and finance other than it’s added to my long list of mistakes in not going into thatVery Funny...I still can't believe these guys are getting bailed...WTF. Thats like the biggest F-U to everyone who has lost in an investment in history.
Neither do I...I guess I just don't understand why these people get re-imbursed. I mean the depositors...Yes help them out, but the investors should not get money. They lost on their investment move on!I don’t know anything about banks and finance other than it’s added to my long list of mistakes in not going into that
Uh, I don't think investors in failed banks normally get reimbursed by the govt, do they?Neither do I...I guess I just don't understand why these people get re-imbursed. I mean the depositors...Yes help them out, but the investors should not get money. They lost on their investment move on!
Edit and @
mcmurtry66
at the taxpayers expense
Correct me if I'm wrong are they not getting bailout money? I Hope Not!Uh, I don't think investors in failed banks normally get reimbursed by the govt, do they?
Just the depositors get reimbursed, right?
Dirty lib checking in but can’t find much to disagree on with Senator Lankford’s questioning of Janet Yellen. On phone and supremely lazy so I won’t link a damn thing. However, the gist was a question surrounding what level of cover people from Tulsa would get should one of this local banks fail? Would the larger depositors in Tulsa get the same treatment? Yellen basically said “no”.Very Funny...I still can't believe these guys are getting bailed...WTF. Thats like the biggest F-U to everyone who has lost in an investment in history.
Best sexy-face-without-legs-or-chest from those years = Lauren Bacall, right?That was Donna Reed. Used to watch the Donna Reed Show all the time as a kid.
Rita Hayworth was a total hottie - my fave of the old Hollywood ladies.
Guess who this is.Wh-a-t? Donna Reed?
Oh OK, I guess you're right.
![]()
Correct me if I'm wrong are they not getting bailout money? I Hope Not!
But above the 250k max though right? Will the same level of protection apply to the next bank failure but where the bank is 2% the size of SVB?Consider yourself corrected. Biden specifically said the bank's investors would not be bailed out. Depositors only.
But above the 250k max though right? Will the same level of protection apply to the next bank failure but where the bank is 2% the size of SVB?
Not arguing just asking.
Good post per usual. You have things under control in this thread? Joe’s handling the screwed up Dems thread and DANC has the stick a fork in Desantis thread covered. Hoops and jet should be here shortly for support/back up. Dbm is doing research.
I read they would have to insure 17 trillion if it was all banks. Not sure the exact number, but it’s really big. The big four banks are going to get much larger. They don’t need to say it, but they are too big to fail and fully insured.But above the 250k max though right? Will the same level of protection apply to the next bank failure but where the bank is 2% the size of SVB?
Not arguing just asking.
Guess who this is.
![]()
Maybe everyone looks great when they are 20.
I believe the FDIC limit per depositor per bank is $250,000.But above the 250k max though right? Will the same level of protection apply to the next bank failure but where the bank is 2% the size of SVB?
Not arguing just asking.
It's going to be hard for them to not do it going forward. The whole reason they lifted the cap was the reason the raised the cap in 2010 (and at times before that), and in fact was the same reason the FDIC was created in the first place: to give depositors confidence their money is safe in order to prevent bank runs.But above the 250k max though right? Will the same level of protection apply to the next bank failure but where the bank is 2% the size of SVB?
Not arguing just asking.
It's been going downhill for a while.
![]()
What the Hell Happened to the Claremont Institute?
How the once-distinguished conservative think tank plunged into Trumpism, illiberalism, and lying about the election.www.thebulwark.com
I just don't understand the motivation. claremont was so well regarded. conservative voices in academia, political, political philosphoy depts, are damn near nonexistant. to have claremont In calif no less, (which isn't affiliated with the schools which is of course silly bc of course it was through jaffa etc) to throw its rep in the shitter and embrace insanity is sadFinally finished this. Sobering for sure, if not frightening.
COH would feel right at home there.
- “practically speaking, there is almost nothing left to conserve”;
- “our norms are now hopelessly corrupt and need to be destroyed”;
- “our body politic is dying”;
- “in almost every case, the political practices, institutions, and even rhetoric governing the United States have become hostile to both liberty and virtue”;
- the progressives are “narcotizing the American people and turning us into a nation of slaves”;
- “if the defenders of America continue to squabble among themselves, the victory of progressive tyranny will be assured. See you in the gulag”;
- “America, as an identity or political movement, might need to carry on without the United States.”
Ayn Rand said it in the 50'sAt the end of the day, liberals are not managers. They’re takers, not makers! This bank failure is an example.
With you as coach, I think we could hang a banner this year.Good post per usual. You have things under control in this thread? Joe’s handling the screwed up Dems thread and DANC has the stick a fork in Desantis thread covered. Hoops and jet should be here shortly for support/back up. Dbm is doing research.