on Merrick Garland for the Supreme Count?
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are you taking about? They voted.on Merrick Garland for the Supreme Count?
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
Yeah, but do you remember Merrick Garland?What are you taking about? They voted.
Yeah, they voted to ignore the impeachment charges.What are you taking about? They voted.
You are dumber than dirt. You are a total embarrassment to the GOP.Yeah, they voted to ignore the impeachment charges.
Yeah! Because you have leftist assholes that claim article 1 is unconstitutional. Schumer is a joke. I think the whole Demorat party is a joke.Yeah, they voted to ignore the impeachment charges.
If you are not embarrassed by now you should be. Basic comprehension skills seem to have left you.on Merrick Garland for the Supreme Count?
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
As usual, you have no cogent thought on the matter, so you resort to insults.If you are not embarrassed by now you should be. Basic comprehension skills seem to have left you.
Bring the fire Dan...As usual, you have no cogent thought on the matter, so you resort to insults.
And most of the world with a functioning brain know that Trump and Trumpers are a joke.Yeah! Because you have leftist assholes that claim article 1 is unconstitutional. Schumer is a joke. I think the whole Demorat party is a joke.
Zeke continuing to bring premium contentAnd most of the world with a functioning brain know that Trump and Trumpers are a joke.
care to explain the comparison?on Merrick Garland for the Supreme Count?
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
I am waiting for the conservatives to respond to your post calling it a drive byZeke continuing to bring premium content
To be fair, DANC sticks around.I am waiting for the conservatives to respond to your post calling it a drive by
They voted. Which makes your original comparison nonsensical.Yeah, they voted to ignore the impeachment charges.
You missed the point. It's not that they 'voted'. They didn't vote on impeachment, which is their duty, under the Constitution.They voted. Which makes your original comparison nonsensical.
Hick just wanted to used the term 'drive by'. He doesn't really understand what it means.To be fair, DANC sticks around.
They're not the same and I never said they were.care to explain the comparison?
1) Dems vote against impeachment on a partisan witch-hunt that was solely based on revenge for Trump being impeached on much more serious charges. Btw, Republicans in the Senate voted against removing Trump as well.
vs
2) McConnell refusing to fill an open spot on the Supreme Court seat for almost a year when Obama was president due to it being an Election year. An excuse never before used for refusing to fill a seat. 4 years later, he rushed through filling a seat during the 2020 election.
Now explain how 1 and 2 are the same.
To be fair, DANC sticks around.
Probably more apropos.I'm not sure higher frequency of posts is a good thing in this instance. I guess can call it doing donuts
That's a very weak argument, and also not one you made in your OP. Trying to back pedal this just makes you look stupid.You missed the point. It's not that they 'voted'. They didn't vote on impeachment, which is their duty, under the Constitution.
But the larger point is that @UncleMark had a fit when McConnell went against normal Senate procedure and held up the hearing for Garland. But he doesn't utter a peep when Schumer goes against normal Senate procedure and blocks an impeachment hearing - the first time in history for an official who hasn't resigned their position prior to a Senate hearing.
What's nonsensical is your total misunderstanding of those points.
Rule #1 Liberal PlaybookAs usual, you have no cogent thought on the matter, so you resort to insults.
Just trying to follow your lead …Zeke continuing to bring premium content
Um you haven’t been around here long if you think that is the liberal playbook. May I introduce you to OP to start with?Rule #1 Liberal Playbook
And most of the world with a functioning brain know that Trump and Trumpers are a joke.
Like I said...Insults. Ive already had the pleasure.I’m you haven’t been around here long if you think that is the liberal playbook. May I introduce you to OP to start with?
Not nearly as stupid as you look not understanding the point.That's a very weak argument, and also not one you made in your OP. Trying to back pedal this just makes you look stupid.
Delta Tau Chi does not have explosives. By order of the United Nations. Otherwise, we’d have to nuke them . . . .Probably more apropos.
UTFO just throws a grenade and watches the aftermath.
I think he would be shocked by the results if we actually counted insults lobbed by conservative posters vs liberal posters.Um you haven’t been around here long if you think that is the liberal playbook. May I introduce you to OP to start with?
What are you taking about? They voted.
You are dumber than dirt. You are a total embarrassment to the GOP.
The Democrats voted that Mayorkas was carrying out administration policy, therefore impeachment is a violation of separation of powers.Yeah, they voted to ignore the impeachment charges.
Danc has nothing right. He compared a case where McConnell didn't allow a vote to a case where Schumer did.The Democrats voted that Mayorkas was carrying out administration policy, therefore impeachment is a violation of separation of powers.
The Democrat argument is total bullshit and Danc has this one exactly right.
The impeachment charge is not about policy, it’s about Mayorkas refusal to enforce the law. Disagreeing with the policy of the law is not grounds to ignore the law. By saying following the law is “policy” the democrats have just told all of us that the administration has discretion about whether to follow the law. That’s crazy.
Why in the hell should congress pass any law if the executive branch has discretion whether to follow it?
I expected the trial to be about the idea that the administration is unable to follow the law because of Trump or something.
But no, the Democrats stuck yet another knife in the side of good government by saying following the law is it’s sole and unreviewable choice.
Oh, that’s what makes him look stupid… I thought it was something else.That's a very weak argument, and also not one you made in your OP. Trying to back pedal this just makes you look stupid.
Didn’t they actually vote on a motion that Schumer made, but NEVER voted on what the house sent over. Two totaly separate things, right?Danc has nothing right. He compared a case where McConnell didn't allow a vote to a case where Schumer did.
That you guys don't like the outcome is immaterial. His point was idiotic.
DTX was our intrmural basketball team name back in the day. Ahhh the memories.Delta Tau Chi does not have explosives. By order of the United Nations. Otherwise, we’d have to nuke them . . . .
Burning sacks of dog shit, OTOH . . . .
It's still infinitely more things than the Senate voted on re: Garland. OP's point was a bad one. You can't explain it into something other than it was.Didn’t they actually vote on a motion that Schumer made, but NEVER voted on what the house sent over. Two totaly separate things, right?
Did you all sober up by half-time or did you just gut it out?DTX was our intrmural basketball team name back in the day. Ahhh the memories.
More than once I went from Happy Hour to a game. I was, of course, much younger then.Did you all sober up by half-time or did you just gut it out?
Or, if you were all toked up like Kevin Durant before a game you might have had some out-of-your-mind outside shooting from beyond the arc. The rim can look five feet in diameter.
Odd way to say he and now me, are correct, but I’ll take the win. See you at chipotle councilor.It's still infinitely more things than the Senate voted on re: Garland. OP's point was a bad one. You can't explain it into something other than it was.
When you start sweating out that PBR nobody wants to guard you.More than once I went from Happy Hour to a game. I was, of course, much younger then.
That and ripping ass in the lane.When you start sweating out that PBR nobody wants to guard you.