That is why I told you to take advantage of every day left although I'm dubious it will helpWell if people get help in May, they may not need it by June.
That is why I told you to take advantage of every day left although I'm dubious it will helpWell if people get help in May, they may not need it by June.
I only have so much bandwidth to counter stupidity.No, the Clinton numbers were correct. The graph was about those in each administration that were indicted. Only two in Clinton’s administration were indicted. Campaigns don’t count. Your list includes Clinton cronies, family, friends and associates outside the administration that were indicted. Yes, there were many, but they weren’t in the administration.
The Washington Post was the source of his inaccurate graph, I believe, and he definitely should have sourced it. Why aren’t you focusing on the fact that they falsely claimed 215 in Trump’s administration were indicted when the number is actually just six? Why attempt a whatabout when the number for Trump was wildly wrong? That should be your attack. I’m helping you out here.
Again, I recommend addressing the incorrect facts rather than doing a "what about." You should be happy that I'm advising a Trumpster on what to do to defend Trump!I only have so much bandwidth to counter stupidity.
It's much easier to just list Clinton corruption.
I only have so much bandwidth to counter stupidity.
It's much easier to just list Clinton corruption.
Trump doesn’t need to be defended, just asslicked.Again, I recommend addressing the incorrect facts rather than doing a "what about." You should be happy that I'm advising a Trumpster on what to do to defend Trump!
You do ass licking? Don’t see anything appealing about that.Trump doesn’t need to be defended, just asslicked.
You volunteering?Trump doesn’t need to be defended, just asslicked.
Trumpniks asslick in every way imaginable. Happens here daily. I don’t see the appeal in engaging them in endless posts as you have done in the last couple days. DANC will never but never change his view about collusion or anything else.You do ass licking? Don’t see anything appealing about that.
Thanks for the recommendation. HIs point has already been rendered moot.Again, I recommend addressing the incorrect facts rather than doing a "what about." You should be happy that I'm advising a Trumpster on what to do to defend Trump!
Why should I? I'm right.Trumpniks asslick in every way imaginable. Happens here daily. I don’t see the appeal in engaging them in endless posts as you have done in the last couple days. DANC will never but never change his view about collusion or anything else.
He wasn't unconstitutional? Trying to get Sec. of States to find him 11,700 votes to overturn an election is not unconstitutional? Urging states to bring an "alternate" set of electors on Jan 6th in order to overturn the election is not unconstitutional? Holding up appropriated money to the Ukraine in order for that country to open up an investigation on his political rival?He wasn’t an unconstitutional President, but the rest is correct.
The Prez of the Flat Earth Society speaks.He lost according to the official results. I don't think he lost the vote count, but it's impossible to tell because there were not voter signature verifications on the votes that came in at the last minute.
No. He was legitimately elected in 2016. He wasn’t President after the January inauguration of President Biden. Please don’t be stupid. We have more than enough stupid here.He wasn't unconstitutional? Trying to get Sec. of States to find him 11,700 votes to overturn an election is not unconstitutional? Urging states to bring an "alternate" set of electors on Jan 6th in order to overturn the election is not unconstitutional? Holding up appropriated money to the Ukraine in order for that country to open up an investigation on his political rival?
And you could not answer the question could youReminder: May is Mental Health Month. Help is available, even for you.
Boy I gotta admit. Your a "funny" dumb mother trucker.He wasn't unconstitutional? Trying to get Sec. of States to find him 11,700 votes to overturn an election is not unconstitutional? Urging states to bring an "alternate" set of electors on Jan 6th in order to overturn the election is not unconstitutional? Holding up appropriated money to the Ukraine in order for that country to open up an investigation on his political rival?
No. He was legitimately elected in 2016. He wasn’t President after the January inauguration of President Biden. Please don’t be stupid. We have more than enough stupid here.
What is wrong with people here? He specifically said he was an unconstitutional President. He didn’t even mention “things that were unconstitutional.” Read the post I replied to. It’s ridiculous that we argue about facts. Please help with stopping this BS, don’t perpetuate it.You guys are talking about 2 different things. He didn't say Trump was illegitimate. He said he did things that were unconstitutional and listed some of the things he did.
Can you stop embarrassing us Republicans and IU grads? In post after post you show you don’t understand simple grammar like “you, your or you’re.” Your spelling is atrocious. You also don’t understand punctuation. It’s a chore to try to decipher what your posts actually mean. It’s all embarrassing. I recommend you stop posting so people don’t continue to gather evidence that you’re not very intelligent. It would also cease your embarrassment of other Republicans.And you could not answer the question could you
Boy I gotta admit. Your a "funny" dumb mother trucker.
Thanks for the recommendation. HIs point has already been rendered moot.
EDIT: I don't see anything wrong about whutabouts as long as they're pertinent to the subject. It exposes hypocrisy.
Whutabout = "I don't want to talk about it because it exposes my hypocisy"In grade school we were taught to “compare and contrast” but now as adults it’s called “whataboutism” and is looked down upon. One of many lies we were all apparently told. Lol
Look at the policy positions of the 3 most popular (Governors Phil Scott of Vermont, Charlie Baker of Massachusetts and Larry Hogan of Maryland), they would be lumped in with the Squad on a national level.Lots of good choices there....unfortunately unless the fever breaks in the next two years, none will be considered viable.
Hey alohaCan you stop embarrassing us Republicans and IU grads? In post after post you show you don’t understand simple grammar like “you, your or you’re.” Your spelling is atrocious. You also don’t understand punctuation. It’s a chore to try to decipher what your posts actually mean. It’s all embarrassing. I recommend you stop posting so people don’t continue to gather evidence that you’re not very intelligent. It would also cease your embarrassment of other Republicans.
The only thing he won was a tax-payer funded helicopter ride out of the White House and into the dustbin of history.Hey aloha
Trump won. Now go stick it up your ass. Is that good enough English for you.
What is wrong with people here? He specifically said he was an unconstitutional President. He didn’t even mention “things that were unconstitutional.” Read the post I replied to. It’s ridiculous that we argue about facts. Please help with stopping this BS, don’t perpetuate it.
English and grammar are better. Congratulations. The post is still nuts, so that’s not changed.Hey aloha
Trump won. Now go stick it up your ass. Is that good enough English for you.
It’s not possible to divine his meaning from his post as you’re doing. He said he was an unconstitutional President and I can only assume that’s what he meant. Why would I not think he meant what he posted?He may have used the wrong word but it was clear he didn't mean illegitimate, which is where you took it for some reason.
Those things listed were illegal and definitely an abuse of power.
Given he thought the judicial branch was there to do his bidding, I think it could easily be argued that he was not respecting the constitution.
*are 😎English and grammar is better.
It’s not possible to divine his meaning from his post as you’re doing. He said he was an unconstitutional President and I can only assume that’s what he meant. Why would I not think he meant what he posted?
That's definitely not how Christ would talk. You could benefit from some self-reflection.Hey aloha
Trump won. Now go stick it up your ass. Is that good enough English for you.
I don’t know what your problem is,but I think he’s one of the best posters on here.That's definitely not how Christ would talk. You could benefit from some self-reflection.
I'm a sinner bowl just like everyone else. The difference btwn me and you...I'm saved.That's definitely not how Christ would talk. You could benefit from some self-reflection.
So much obsession around here...According to Biden it's Ultra Maga King. Even Joe knows that. Keep ranting Joe!The only thing he won was a tax-payer funded helicopter ride out of the White House and into the dustbin of history.
Hey aloha
Trump won. Now go stick it up your ass. Is that good enough English for you.
You said Trump again hick...ohhh and btw Trump WonTrump won? Lmao
I don't see him in the white house. Suck it
From everything I've seen here, your thought process seems to be: "I'm saved, therefore I can be a dick." You probably should rethink that approach.I'm a sinner bowl just like everyone else. The difference btwn me and you...I'm saved.
You said Trump again hick...ohhh and btw Trump Won
Good one.You said it bowl not me
Wow 3 times in 1 post. Your'e getting the hang of this. Keep on Trumpin hicky.Only dumbasses think Trump won. Even Trump appointed judges said Trump lost....but they are all liars and you know the facts.
Ftw = country's biggest dumbass
So all those ballot runners...You know the ones on 4 million minutes of video aren't guilty? The ones that visited ballot boxes 5 to 100 times with handfuls of ballots caught on camera. You think they should be allowed to go free?Good one.
And that "2,000 Mules" movie is complete nonsense. Someone should do a responsive film and call it, "2,000 Mules Touted by 2,000 Jackasses."
Trump lost. He's a loser.
FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’
A film debuting in over 270 theaters across the United States this week uses a flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to cast doubt on the results of the 2020 presidential election nearly 18 months after it ended.apnews.com