Must be a failure. Usually as people age and become successful they vote Republican.I am not a liberal Democrat at all, but I voted for a Democrat for President for the first time at age 54.
Must be a failure. Usually as people age and become successful they vote Republican.I am not a liberal Democrat at all, but I voted for a Democrat for President for the first time at age 54.
When presented with awful choices - chaos is introduced.Must be a failure. Usually as people age and become successful they vote Republican.
Unfortunately awful choices are going to be the norm going forward. Great choices want no part to dealing with the media that want to destroy them.When presented with awful choices - chaos is introduced.
According to this the hearings may help get rid of Trump so we need to thank the Democrats for helping.I'm not saying conventional wisdom is still correct, or even that it ever was. I mean, obviously, it looks right now that it will be Trump or DeSantis. But who knows who else will throw their hat in the ring after the midterms?
Common sense is like deodorant. The people who need it the most never use it. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣I'm a wise bastage, I am.
Well it did survive Trump, so you're being a drama queen.Aside from your juvenile name-calling, I'm thankful every day that Trump is out of power. We'll survive Biden, doubt our democracy would have survived Trump.
Subverting how justice works in America always has the possibility of swaying the mentally weak.According to this the hearings may help get rid of Trump so we need to thank the Democrats for helping.
GOP strategist finds a 'stunning turnaround' as more Republican voters want an alternative to Trump
Sarah Longwell, a Never Trump conservative and Republican strategist who supported President Joe Biden in 2020, has been hoping that former President Donald Trump would lose his iron grip on the Republican Party. When Longwell made a CNN appearance on Sunday, July 24, she sounded optimistic —...www.alternet.org
Thank you. Welcome to the Radical Center.
I'm not praising and never have praised them. I just think it's kinda funny that the hearings might make Trump less of influence in the R party and in turn might end up helping the Rs.Subverting how justice works in America always has the possibility of swaying the mentally weak.
I'm surprised you would praise the hearings at all, considering what a one-sided shit show it is.
I don't think it's good for Republicans if they turn off over half the Republican Party, who are Trump supporters.I'm not praising and never have praised them. I just think it's kinda funny that the hearings might make Trump less of influence in the R party and in turn might end up helping the Rs.
Danc those same people have DonkeyPox!I don't think it's good for Republicans if they turn off over half the Republican Party, who are Trump supporters.
What has the clown show shown so far? That Trump got upset because he couldn't go to the Capitol? That he didn't act to stop the rioting soon enough, even though he told his followers to go peacefully? That he didn't follow the advice of some of his staffers and now they testify "I told you so"?
And all that without any cross-examination?
That's a whole lot of nothing.
I think the only people that affects are those who were easily swayable anyway.
Any way you can foresee voting for her?I admit i tend to lean to the left from time to time, but I always think for myself and assess every situation with my own thinking.
Hell, I voted for Trump the first go around (one of the few times I've voted Republican in my short time voting for president, I just turned 40). There's no way I could bring myself to vote for Hillary.
Tell me there is some context behind that which makes it less stupid.
The woke pronoun stuff aside I think the suit color would have to be for visually impaired people. But again I don’t know what value that adds for all the horrible virtual signaling negative attention.Tell me there is some context behind that which makes it less stupid.
It's okay for someone to support Trump (I don't but it's not a problem if you do). What I don't get is supporting him at all cost. I would hope that if he's not the nominee that you would support whoever is nominated. There's a lot of Trump supporters that won't so that gets down to being a cult in my opinion. I think because of all of Trump's baggage another candidate has a better chance of winning.I don't think it's good for Republicans if they turn off over half the Republican Party, who are Trump supporters.
What has the clown show shown so far? That Trump got upset because he couldn't go to the Capitol? That he didn't act to stop the rioting soon enough, even though he told his followers to go peacefully? That he didn't follow the advice of some of his staffers and now they testify "I told you so"?
And all that without any cross-examination?
That's a whole lot of nothing.
I think the only people that affects are those who were easily swayable anyway.
Did you announce as f*ck and you as your pronouns?I have spoken in conferences where I have been asked to state my pronouns before giving a talk. Always struck me as a little weird, but not a big issue either.
I will vote for whoever the Republicans nominate. I may or may not vote for Trump - frankly, I have my doubts he'll run again. But piss off enough Trump supporters because of this show trial and they will stay home, which could easily hand the election to a Democrat.It's okay for someone to support Trump (I don't but it's not a problem if you do). What I don't get is supporting him at all cost. I would hope that if he's not the nominee that you would support whoever is nominated. There's a lot of Trump supporters that won't so that gets down to being a cult in my opinion. I think because of all of Trump's baggage another candidate has a better chance of winning.
Is 'bullshitter' a pronoun?I have spoken in conferences where I have been asked to state my pronouns before giving a talk. Always struck me as a little weird, but not a big issue either.
If the Pub nominee is someone like Romney, Liz Cheney, Kizinger, I WILL vote for Pelosi. Or even better, the younger Pelosi, Newsome.It's okay for someone to support Trump (I don't but it's not a problem if you do). What I don't get is supporting him at all cost. I would hope that if he's not the nominee that you would support whoever is nominated. There's a lot of Trump supporters that won't so that gets down to being a cult in my opinion. I think because of all of Trump's baggage another candidate has a better chance of winning.
You're a sick man. 🤣If the Pub nominee is someone like Romney, Liz Cheney, Kizinger, I WILL vote for Pelosi. Or even better, the younger Pelosi, Newsome.
Romney & Kinzinger are nothing like Liz Cheney, one of the most conservative Representatives ever. You are apparently choosing based on Trumpism, not conservatism. Liz Cheney would actually be far RIGHT of Trump. Very pro-life too, if you're into that.If the Pub nominee is someone like Romney, Liz Cheney, Kizinger, I WILL vote for Pelosi. Or even better, the younger Pelosi, Newsome.
Kind of ironic.Romney & Kizinger are nothing like Liz Cheney, one of the most conservative Representatives ever. You are apparently choosing based on Trumoism, not conservatism.
Personally, that's where I would draw the line. They're welcome to their nonsense, but I wouldn't participate in it.I have spoken in conferences where I have been asked to state my pronouns before giving a talk. Always struck me as a little weird, but not a big issue either.
Well, if somebody invites you to give a talk they are usually paying some of your expenses, so they can usually set the rules.Personally, that's where I would draw the line. They're welcome to their nonsense, but I wouldn't participate in it.
Well, if somebody invites you to give a talk they are usually paying some of your expenses, so they can usually set the rules.
So you perpetuate stupidity.Well, if somebody invites you to give a talk they are usually paying some of your expenses, so they can usually set the rules.
One way to not dwell on it is to put it in writing on the title PowerPoint slide at the bottom and not actually verbalize it.
So because someone is paying your expenses you’ll kowtow to their whims even if you disagree with them? I don’t mean that in a spiteful manner - that’s how I interpreted your post.Well, if somebody invites you to give a talk they are usually paying some of your expenses, so they can usually set the rules.
One way to not dwell on it is to put it in writing on the title PowerPoint slide at the bottom and not actually verbalize it.
What if they told you “don’t say X or Y. don’t talk about Z either. It would upset our peoples.”Well, if somebody invites you to give a talk they are usually paying some of your expenses, so they can usually set the rules.
One way to not dwell on it is to put it in writing on the title PowerPoint slide at the bottom and not actually verbalize it.
I think cross examination would be fascinating. Republicans cross examining Republican's because republicans are basically the only ones who have testified. I am sure they will want to change their testimony that they gave under oath because the penalties for perjury are only a prison sentence and fine.I don't think it's good for Republicans if they turn off over half the Republican Party, who are Trump supporters.
What has the clown show shown so far? That Trump got upset because he couldn't go to the Capitol? That he didn't act to stop the rioting soon enough, even though he told his followers to go peacefully? That he didn't follow the advice of some of his staffers and now they testify "I told you so"?
And all that without any cross-examination?
That's a whole lot of nothing.
I think the only people that affects are those who were easily swayable anyway.
I don't see it as a huge deal. LOL, "kowtow to their whims".So because someone is paying your expenses you’ll kowtow to their whims even if you disagree with them? I don’t mean that in a spiteful manner - that’s how I interpreted your post.
I don't know why they didn't go with "Pubs of Tiktok"Sorry man. If you’re watching Meidas Touch videos you’re getting insane takes and hyper partisan bullshit. You can at ease with the pretense of being even remotely conservative if Meidas Touch is hitting your feed.
My pronoun is effyuI have spoken in conferences where I have been asked to state my pronouns before giving a talk. Always struck me as a little weird, but not a big issue either.
Conservatives don’t like change, by definition. Clearly Liz Cheney started with integrity and just doesn’t want to change that.Romney & Kinzinger are nothing like Liz Cheney, one of the most conservative Representatives ever. You are apparently choosing based on Trumpism, not conservatism. Liz Cheney would actually be far RIGHT of Trump. Very pro-life too, if you're into that.
Im thinking maybe “God”? How would that go over with the biology deniers?My pronoun is effyu
But I want Pence in that primary, too.That primary would be a bloodbath.
Nothing wrong with being effeminate OS….I have spoken in conferences where I have been asked to state my pronouns before giving a talk. Always struck me as a little weird, but not a big issue either.