His career record doesn't make him an above average coach. Above average is a guy like Matta. Great is coach K and Izzo types.
I define average as the mathematical definition. So, in my definition a .500 career record is average: anything above it is above average.
I understand that you define it differently. If your standard is a record like Thad Matt's (76% in the Big 10) then Crean does not meet that standard and falls far short of it. Tom Izzo (71%) and Bo Ryan (74%) come close to Matta's record but they also fall short. I think Matta may have the best winning % within the Big 10 of all current Big 10 coaches, so your standard for above average = being the best in the Big 10.
Note: I used the stats from Wikipedia. And, I am not saying I disagree with your standard. You certainly can set your standard wherever you wish. However, when I gave my definition of "average" I did not say or imply that, going forward this would be an acceptable winning % for IU. If CTC does not start doing better than that, he will probably be gone.
Last edited: