ADVERTISEMENT

Fred Glass deserves an ultimatum

It went down hill years ago. We have missed the tourney 7 out of the last 11 years. So, I wouldn't worry about it getting worse.

Also, Archie, isn't that good. That's why we keep losing so many games. I know you're one of the maudlin IU fans, but keep your head up when/if he gets fired. IU basketball doesn't end with Archie.

We are still one of the most desirable jobs in the nation and coaches will still want to coach here. The issue is we have dolts running the program who continue to hire average (putting it kindly) coaches.
If the admins truly wanted to win they would throw 7 million at chris beard after his season ends. We have the money. But they will never pony up.
 
You mean it's right on the website? Huh...who knew? And here I was thinking it was some super secret, eyes only portfolio locked up under armed security so Glass and McRobbie could purposely ruin IU athletics with it while drinking brandy and lighting their cigars with $100 bills ripped off from Big Ten Network money as they secretly plot evil academic improvements for the University.
 
Two years ago it was called "Creaning" and was the Worst. Thing. EVAR.
Fast forward to today and its "why are all these loser bums still on my basketball team? Throw 'em in the street!"
That's not Creaning that's just simply roster management and every coach does it eventually.

What Crean did at Marquette (where he earned the phrase by Wisconsin fans) and at IU, was over recruit. Consistently and yearly thus assuring he would have to have transfers and which left his teams perpetually inexperienced. Creaning is recruiting players for spots that are already filled. Creaning is the act of over recruiting first and then having transfers after.

It's comparable to having a fiance while already married.. which is never a good look.

Got it? Good ..

btw - it's different than over signing, but we'll keep it simple for now.
 
That's not Creaning that's just simply roster management and every coach does it eventually.

What Crean did at Marquette (where he earned the phrase by Wisconsin fans) and at IU, was over recruit. Consistently and yearly thus assuring he would have to have transfers and which left his teams perpetually inexperienced. Creaning is recruiting players for spots that are already filled. Creaning is the act of over recruiting first and then having transfers after.

It's comparable to having a fiance while already married.. which is never a good look.

Got it? Good ..

btw - it's different than over signing, but we'll keep it simple for now.
It's a distinction rooted in dislike of Crean and now, dislike of Miller (not by you. I know you're on board with Miller).

If you want non-contributing players to be cut, you want non-contributing players to be cut. It really doesn't matter when their replacements are recruited or how you parse it.
Crean's roster turnover problem was poor roster management but to call it some evil plot to surprise current players by introducing them to their replacement on their way out the door is silly. If you want to play that game, I'd call Crean's approach smarter than cutting someone and leaving a hole in your roster that may not be filled. This is big boy basketball after all, right?
For the record, I'm not in favor of either approach. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of people who think it's OK for one coach to do something and not OK for another coach to do essentially the same thing.
 
1. Who would you forcefully remove? 2. Would you elabotate on any major character issues on the current team, with sources? I haven't heard anything bad outside of Green's suspension, and with no reliable evidence on what happened there.... 3. APR is a lot more binding of a reason NOT to kick players off teams....or would you like to have no shot at the tourney before any games are played? 4. If you don't honor commitments, how can you expect anyone to honor or trust you? 5. This is IU and we need to hold our program to much higher standards than we did from 2000-recent times. 6. To all people who are pissed at Glass, look at revenues and progress in all sports. He isn't going anywhere. Whether you are butt hurt over "keeping Crean too long", firing Wilson, with reason, or peeing in your Cheerios, get over it. He has done an amazing job compared to out last 3 AD's (who were directly responsible for coaching hires, facilities not being upgraded, and athletics losing money during their terms). Move on

So happy Fred Glass was able to negotiate the BTN contract since he’s such a damn good lawyer.. without the BTN money he’s a fish out of water..
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUgradman
It's a distinction rooted in dislike of Crean and now, dislike of Miller (not by you. I know you're on board with Miller).

If you want non-contributing players to be cut, you want non-contributing players to be cut. It really doesn't matter when their replacements are recruited or how you parse it.
Crean's roster turnover problem was poor roster management but to call it some evil plot to surprise current players by introducing them to their replacement on their way out the door is silly. If you want to play that game, I'd call Crean's approach smarter than cutting someone and leaving a hole in your roster that may not be filled. This is big boy basketball after all, right?
For the record, I'm not in favor of either approach. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of people who think it's OK for one coach to do something and not OK for another coach to do essentially the same thing.

There is a huge difference...

All coaches crean sometimes, only Crean creaned all the time.

Semantics aside, it was a dumb approach. i agree it wasn't a plot -- crean honestly thought he could improve by dumping some players every year...and then he'd lose others because he is one of the most annoying human beings to have ever lived.

it's like saying going 35 in a 30 mph zone is the same as going 100 mph in a 30 mph zone. they are both infractions, right? Nuance is our friend.
 
not by you. I know you're on board with Miller).
I am?

fwiw - I'm neither a fan nor a hater. That sh*t's for the simple minded. It's just that the haters in their butthurt emotionally compromised state say the dumbest things. I'm anti dumb pro smart more than anything.

There is a huge difference in Creaning vs just having transfers. Just ask AAU and HS coaches throughout the state. One is business as usual, the other seems more like a basketball pimp flesh peddling.
 
I am?

fwiw - I'm neither a fan nor a hater. That sh*t's for the simple minded. It's just that the haters in their butthurt emotionally compromised state say the dumbest things. I'm anti dumb pro smart more than anything.

There is a huge difference in Creaning vs just having transfers. Just ask AAU and HS coaches throughout the state. One is business as usual, the other seems more like a basketball pimp flesh peddling.
Well, I should have said you're on board...for now. Didn't mean that you're a fanboy. And I think we feel the same about anti dumb commentary. That's about 90% of my posts.

At any rate, I don't see the difference between cutting a player and finding a replacement and finding a replacement of a player you intend to cut. It's all business as usual and it's all flesh peddling and we're all complicit. What I'm talking about isn't "just transferring", it's the calls for Miller to cut kids- Green and Smith, specifically- so they can be replaced. Those calls are all over these boards and it's no different that what Crean did.
 
Those calls are all over these boards and it's no different that what Crean did.
Crean had 15 players one year for 13 spots. That guarantees 2 transfers. He did this every year he was coaching from 2003 on and it gave him a reputation among the AAU and HS coaches as an over recruiter. Why do you think his recruiting fell off so sharply? The state coaches didn't trust him with their players. A secondary byproduct was that his teams were perpetually inexperienced from constantly having transfers. It's not the same.. it created a culture of constant turnover and sense of disloyalty.
 
Last edited:
Crean had 15 players one year for 13 spots. That guarantees 2 transfers. He did this every year he was coaching from 2003 on and it gave him a reputation among the AAU and HS coaches as an over recruiter. Why do you think his recruiting fell off so sharply? The state coaches didn't trust him with their players. A secondary byproduct was that his teams were perpetually inexperienced from constantly having transfers. It's not the same.. it created a culture of constant turnover.
I'm not arguing that Crean didn't manage his roster poorly. I'm arguing that there's no difference, in my mind, between what he did and calling for kids to be cut from the team so they can be replaced. I don't know that you think the latter is OK but I don't support either approach. I think, at this point, we're talking past each other on this topic and we should just focus on being anti dumb.
 
It's a distinction rooted in dislike of Crean and now, dislike of Miller (not by you. I know you're on board with Miller).

Crean's roster turnover problem was poor roster management but to call it some evil plot to surprise current players by introducing them to their replacement on their way out the door is silly. If you want to play that game, I'd call Crean's approach smarter than cutting someone and leaving a hole in your roster that may not be filled. This is big boy basketball after all, right?
For the record, I'm not in favor of either approach. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of people who think it's OK for one coach to do something and not OK for another coach to do essentially the same thing.

The problem was that many times Clappy creaned players and then replaced them with the likes of Priller, Gelon and April. Also when he oversigned, IU had no scholarships for players that were available and had B1G ability. Archie is vastly superior in roster management than his predecessor. If Crean thought Moore was good enough to play at IU, then he should be welcoming him to Georgia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUgradman
I am?

fwiw - I'm neither a fan nor a hater. That sh*t's for the simple minded. It's just that the haters in their butthurt emotionally compromised state say the dumbest things. I'm anti dumb pro smart more than anything.

There is a huge difference in Creaning vs just having transfers. Just ask AAU and HS coaches throughout the state. One is business as usual, the other seems more like a basketball pimp flesh peddling.

You haven’t been “pro smart” with anything. You do have the emotionally butthurt part down. Please don’t tattle on me again. xoxo
 
I had a post deleted the last time I responded to you. Mea culpa if you didn’t report it.
Naw, that's not my style. If you sh*t talked I'd ignore it. If you said something stupid I'd attack it. But telling on you? To who the mods? Do we have mods?
 
Naw, that's not my style. If you sh*t talked I'd ignore it. If you said something stupid I'd attack it. But telling on you? To who the mods? Do we have mods?

I thought it was weird. I didn’t take you for the type and it wasn’t that bad. I’ve said it worse. The mods must randomly pop in. Bulk said he had a post or two deleted a couple of weeks ago. Cheers. Enjoy your weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T.M.P.
The problem was that many times Clappy creaned players and then replaced them with the likes of Priller, Gelon and April. Also when he oversigned, IU had no scholarships for players that were available and had B1G ability. Archie is vastly superior in roster management than his predecessor. If Crean thought Moore was good enough to play at IU, then he should be welcoming him to Georgia.
That doesn't really have anything to do with my post but OK.
 
You mean it's right on the website? Huh...who knew? And here I was thinking it was some super secret, eyes only portfolio locked up under armed security so Glass and McRobbie could purposely ruin IU athletics with it while drinking brandy and lighting their cigars with $100 bills ripped off from Big Ten Network money as they secretly plot evil academic improvements for the University.
Not one of those links produce an actual contract.
Nothing you joke about was ever remotely suggested by myself. It's funny, however completely off topic. You hijack my position in your defense of said moron Fred Glass.
Simply put in the dumbed down media version that has been linked, section 8 says it all. Let's put diapers on the kids and bastardize the coaches.
 
It's a distinction rooted in dislike of Crean and now, dislike of Miller (not by you. I know you're on board with Miller).

If you want non-contributing players to be cut, you want non-contributing players to be cut. It really doesn't matter when their replacements are recruited or how you parse it.
Crean's roster turnover problem was poor roster management but to call it some evil plot to surprise current players by introducing them to their replacement on their way out the door is silly. If you want to play that game, I'd call Crean's approach smarter than cutting someone and leaving a hole in your roster that may not be filled. This is big boy basketball after all, right?
For the record, I'm not in favor of either approach. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of people who think it's OK for one coach to do something and not OK for another coach to do essentially the same thing.
TMP is indeed onboard with Miller, don't let him fool you or anyone else. His coach of the year candidate prediction this season will never to be forgotten. There is a reason most people don't take him serious or his one word responses of "dumb" because he has no clue or can't debate in a civil manner. Probably a Crean disciple.
 
Not one of those links produce an actual contract.
Nothing you joke about was ever remotely suggested by myself. It's funny, however completely off topic. You hijack my position in your defense of said moron Fred Glass.
Simply put in the dumbed down media version that has been linked, section 8 says it all. Let's put diapers on the kids and bastardize the coaches.
The ABOR is right on the website. It’s as easy to find as the schedule for any team.
What I posted was a compilation of the stupid comments in this and other threads. Thanks for finding it funny.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT