Who is he usurping that power from? Executive agencies? That he’s in charge of?
Stop being a moron.
Biden news conference thread -- 6:30 pm
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
Stop being a moron.
Stop parroting “Project 2025” as if it means something. I’ve had about enough of this nonsense from your side of the aisle.
I've read about a third of the document so far. I haven't yet seen anything about no-fault divorce. My reference to it is in response to other posters who keep using it as a talking point.
Whether it's mentioned or not in the manifesto I'm confident it will survive. Lol.
It's the blueprint for "Trump - The Sequel." Sorry if that triggers you. Maybe you should put me on ignore.
The thing is that “Trump - The Sequel” isn’t as scary as you’d like it to be.
In large part due to the fact that he was already President for four years and things were fine. So if you’d like to scaremonger, best stick to fear of the unknown.
Ad Hominem (Guilt by Association)
When the source is viewed negatively because of its association with another person or group who is already viewed negatively.
You have an odd penchant for tracking and commenting on people's posting frequency and then jobs, while publicly proclaiming how busy you are. It's a subtle form of personal attack that everyone recognizes. Maybe you don't recognize it though? You only do it with people you hold a grudge against. It's unseemly, but also hypocritical since you complain when others go personal with you. I think you did it in this very thread?
But since you asked, I own my own firm, so no, not between jobs. I just finished a PWC to the SCt, so am less busy and have no deadlines to meet, so am just generally researching other stuff and working on developing a podcast. Mechanically, as I read and research, I have two monitors on (thinking of adding a third). One has my research or writing or video editing, etc., while the other is split between email (three accounts) and the chrome browser. I can type off emails or this message, for example, in a few minutes. It's not difficult or intellectually taxing and is a nice break from the heavy intellectual stuff without taking me completely out of my rhythm. I also read and post on my phone when listening to a podcast, standing in line, pumping gas, the rare times I'm watching live TV, whatever, while checking news feeds, emails, etc.
Maybe one of the reasons I enjoy the WC more than you is that I spend a lot of time bantering with people here and don't treat it as seriously as you. It's why McMurt is beloved by people on both sides--he does it very well--despite his explosive rants against people like you. For me, every argument isn't a life and death struggle and I don't really care about winning or losing them, nor am I that obsessed with Trump, Biden, et al. Maybe it's due to age? I realize I can't control those things, no matter how much I might want to, so instead use this space to try to order my thoughts and test what I think, what I don't agree with, etc. All that said, I do get triggered by people and posting styles here, and I try to work on that--and by extension--myself, too. I get that I trigger you and I'm wishing you good luck on our bet so you don't have to read my posts for 30 days.
Thanks for asking.
I've referenced specific sections and talked about the people behind it. The manifesto speaks for itself. It sounds like you're afraid of facts and the truth.
What have I said factually that's incorrect?
Wake me up when Donnie boy can EVER speak intelligently about foreign diplomacy. Or anything for that matter.
Easy there Zeke. This feels like the beginning of one of your 20 posts in 5 minutes tirades.
Use the brake pedal.
I already said I like what I’ve seen of Project 2025. I don’t understand the hullabaloo.
This reads like the morons in 2016 that were saying a Trump Admin. would be the Handmaid’s Tale.
For God's sake lighten up. It was a softball comment.Ad Hominem (Guilt by Association)
When the source is viewed negatively because of its association with another person or group who is already viewed negatively.www.logicallyfallacious.com
You have an odd penchant for tracking and commenting on people's posting frequency and then jobs, while publicly proclaiming how busy you are. It's a subtle form of personal attack that everyone recognizes. Maybe you don't recognize it though? You only do it with people you hold a grudge against. It's unseemly, but also hypocritical since you complain when others go personal with you. I think you did it in this very thread?
But since you asked, I own my own firm, so no, not between jobs. I just finished a PWC to the SCt, so am less busy and have no deadlines to meet, so am just generally researching other stuff and working on developing a podcast. Mechanically, as I read and research, I have two monitors on (thinking of adding a third). One has my research or writing or video editing, etc., while the other is split between email (three accounts) and the chrome browser. I can type off emails or this message, for example, in a few minutes. It's not difficult or intellectually taxing and is a nice break from the heavy intellectual stuff without taking me completely out of my rhythm. I also read and post on my phone when listening to a podcast, standing in line, pumping gas, the rare times I'm watching live TV, whatever, while checking news feeds, emails, etc.
Maybe one of the reasons I enjoy the WC more than you is that I spend a lot of time bantering with people here and don't treat it as seriously as you. It's why McMurt is beloved by people on both sides--he does it very well--despite his explosive rants against people like you. For me, every argument isn't a life and death struggle and I don't really care about winning or losing them, nor am I that obsessed with Trump, Biden, et al. Maybe it's due to age? I realize I can't control those things, no matter how much I might want to, so instead use this space to try to order my thoughts and test what I think, what I don't agree with, etc. All that said, I do get triggered by people and posting styles here, and I try to work on that--and by extension--myself, too. I get that I trigger you and I'm wishing you good luck on our bet so you don't have to read my posts for 30 days.
Thanks for asking.
The only people whose posting frequency I comment on are you and your brother. Together you account for probably a third of the total content here. Maybe more because he posts under multiple handles. I don't get it and I guess I'm trying to understand it, which is probably an exercise in futility.
I am posting this week more than usual because I'm off. I have 9700 posts in eight years. You have 5300 in ten months.
I remember you called me out once for referring to Trump as "unhuman." But Murt's "explosive rants" are okay as long as they're directed at "people like me?" You have an interesting double-standard, and should probably be a little more circumspect about throwing the "hypocrite" label around.
Just my opinion, but you probably could benefit from a thicker skin.
You'll get a ton of "likes" for your post. You're great at "reading the room." Congratulations.
You don’t get “likes” because nobody likes you.
Explain how Project 25 increases executive power. I think you don’t know what you are talking about.
He read it in stall number 3 at the airport. 🤣
Was he using the secret foot tap?
Blah blah blah yada yada yada I’m developing a podcast @larsIU may I translate this into reality for you?Ad Hominem (Guilt by Association)
When the source is viewed negatively because of its association with another person or group who is already viewed negatively.
You have an odd penchant for tracking and commenting on people's posting frequency and then jobs, while publicly proclaiming how busy you are. It's a subtle form of personal attack that everyone recognizes. Maybe you don't recognize it though? You only do it with people you hold a grudge against. It's unseemly, but also hypocritical since you complain when others go personal with you. I think you did it in this very thread?
But since you asked, I own my own firm, so no, not between jobs. I just finished a PWC to the SCt, so am less busy and have no deadlines to meet, so am just generally researching other stuff and working on developing a podcast. Mechanically, as I read and research, I have two monitors on (thinking of adding a third). One has my research or writing or video editing, etc., while the other is split between email (three accounts) and the chrome browser. I can type off emails or this message, for example, in a few minutes. It's not difficult or intellectually taxing and is a nice break from the heavy intellectual stuff without taking me completely out of my rhythm. I also read and post on my phone when listening to a podcast, standing in line, pumping gas, the rare times I'm watching live TV, whatever, while checking news feeds, emails, etc.
Maybe one of the reasons I enjoy the WC more than you is that I spend a lot of time bantering with people here and don't treat it as seriously as you. It's why McMurt is beloved by people on both sides--he does it very well--despite his explosive rants against people like you. For me, every argument isn't a life and death struggle and I don't really care about winning or losing them, nor am I that obsessed with Trump, Biden, et al. Maybe it's due to age? I realize I can't control those things, no matter how much I might want to, so instead use this space to try to order my thoughts and test what I think, what I don't agree with, etc. All that said, I do get triggered by people and posting styles here, and I try to work on that--and by extension--myself, too. I get that I trigger you and I'm wishing you good luck on our bet so you don't have to read my posts for 30 days.
Thanks for asking.
Lock up it all up and start diggin a dirt account. The midlife crisis has begun!!!!! Right in the throes of WHITEBOYSUMMER MY GOD
In fairness to Brad, I can tell you he doesn't approve of the over the top rampages that McM launches on occasion. He may not join in the outrage they deserve, but he doesn't approve of them by any means.
I think something like this might help you
Why Some Couples Are Joining the "Living Apart Together" Movement
Relationship expert Nicole Moore explains what a living apart together relationship is and why an LAT relationship could work for you and your partner.
It's exhausting really. For no real reason either. Warranty just.....expires.
My ex stoker wanted me to have a He Shed built in our backyard. Somewhere to send me. Looking back I guess that was a signI think something like this might help you
Why Some Couples Are Joining the "Living Apart Together" Movement
Relationship expert Nicole Moore explains what a living apart together relationship is and why an LAT relationship could work for you and your partner.www.popsugar.com
Oh my god. Is he really calling about his Fing case again. Ohhhhhh why is she texting me about my thoughts for dinner. She’s home. No job. That is your job!!! Do I want to go to X’s house for dinner Friday? No. I don’t. I don’t ever want to go anywhere
Warranty just……expires
I've been given three choices for dinner tonight. I'm trying to decide which is the least wrong.
I told her I wanted a salad when i surprised her with lunch this afternoon. Meaning I went from my office to home (she works from home) with Jersey Mike's.
+1 romantic possibility. Take that @BradStevens
We still have a dog house in the back yard two years after she died (not that the dog used it - I built it in case it started raining while she was playing in the back yard). I told the neighbors if they saw two legs sticking out of there in the evening they’d know who was literally in the dog house.
Last edited:
If it is your wife giving you 3 choices then none of them is wrong. 🤣 That if if you know what's good for you.
Or is it "Take it" or "Leave it" as two of the choices..,,, what's the 3rd?
LOL. Softball comment.
Why, then, spend two paragraphs trying to characterize and defend it, including a claim you don't get it and are "trying to understand it" (I just explained it) and then a comment on the % of comment and comp of posts/time. I'm reminded of Feynman's quote: The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.
Re the reference to the Trump thing. Yes, I remember it. I've suspected you continued to hold a grudge for that--at least now I know. Thick skin, indeed.
Read Chapter 2
link: https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-02.pdf
To be sure, they argue that constitutionally the President has total control of the Executive Branch, that presidents have long been derelict in their duty in not exercising this absolute power, and that as a result it has become "a sprawling federal bureaucracy".
They want to end the practice of Presidents not fully controlling any aspect of the executive branch that he (or she, LOL, there's no women in the Heritage cabal) wishes.
You will argue, no doubt, that they are merely calling for using executive powers that (arguably) already exist but that no President has yet wielded. They are , though, clearly stating that the Present should exert more control than any President ever has over the Executive Branch.
edit" Down to the last detail of the president identifying LOYALISTS to lead every department (specified in later chapters).
I really wish there was a worthy opponent here.Your post has as many lies as a Trump speech or debate. For example, Forbes has Biden’s net worth at $10M.
What Is Joe Biden's Net Worth?
Joe Biden's wealth comes from his presidential salary, real estate, pensions and annuities, book royalties, and more. Here are President Biden’s 2023 earnings and net worth.www.investopedia.com
Check out Pelosi, Feinstein, and then get back to me. And when you allege it is their spouse (predictable) how did they make their money?
Your definition of “democracy” sounds a lot like authoritarianism
The subject was Biden and he was right that you were wrong. Shouldn’t you acknowledge that before moving on to other politicians?
Oh does it? My first post in two weeks maybe? Maybe look in a mirror. You’re all over this thread.
