If your point is thatv Democrat Liberal brainwashing is worse than the OP, you are correct.
Democrats have made parts of many of our great cities shitholes.
Democrats have destroyed our southern border
Democrats are driving down education outcomes for minorities.
Democrats have destroyed retail in some locations.
Democrats have increased crime in some locations.
Democrats have Increased drug use in some locations.
Democrats are increasing inequalities all over.
But millions vote for Democrats because they think Democrats will improve their lives.
65-75% of people think the country is on the wrong track, but they vote for the wrong tack. That’s brainwashing.
How does the fact that the crime rate has dropped significantly over the past 20 to 30 years if large cities are now shitholes?
How does the fact that the cities the right likes to point to (NY, Chicago, San Fran) aren't even the most dangerous and violent large cities if they have been turned into shitholes?
Why then are the murder rates significantly higher in Trump won states than Biden won states, and have been getting worse over the past twenty years if your theory of Dem leadership equals high crime?
What republican led cities or states do you point to as the perfect model that you are arguing for?
I get it. It's effective with your base past Nixon and through Reagan (remember the welfare queen story? He picked out one black woman in Chicago and exaggerated her story to represent a scary figure, even though to this day poor, rural whites in red states overwhelmingly suck up federal welfare benefits).
Your fears aren't matching reality.
As far as climate brainwashing, the science community overwhelmingly, like 98 to 2, have been all over our change in temperature. They can point to around a century when things started to fire up, which coincides with the industrial age and the dominance of fossil fuels. Which means the carbon increases/differentiation have been manmade and continues. The scary part is that they believe our temperature change is an exponential graph, not linear, which is ummm not good.
So you've got the brightest people who study it telling us, you have a pretty easy correlation with the rise of fossil fuels being a new, disruptive energy source that belches carbon into the air. Lastly, as Carl Segan once mentioned, the hottest planet isn't Mercury, it's Venus. Why? Because Venus is covered by dense carbon gas that traps the suns heat.
Basically there are two thoughts. It's an issue (the climate alarmists) or it's a hoax or it's getting warmer but it's not a big deal.
If I'm wrong, well that would be great. If you're wrong, that would be biblically awful.
And for what, because we can't wean ourselves off of fossil fuels?
Even the dinosaurs would be shaking their damn heads at us. They got hit with a space rock that they couldn't avoid.
We were just lazy and dumb....and brainwashed by the oil industry.