And it's all made in China. Who does Joe Biden work for?100k deaths from fentanyl coming over the border every year and not a peep from Biden or the Democrats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it's all made in China. Who does Joe Biden work for?100k deaths from fentanyl coming over the border every year and not a peep from Biden or the Democrats.
Poor Zeke. You think you just show up at the Committee and ask to speak.I didn’t say he refused now did I? He said he was coming forward. We are all still waiting on that.
You and the rest of the dupes have a lot of chutzpah for calling anyone looking at the facts a lynch mob.I don't believe the FBI can do no wrong.
I'm not defending the guy. I don't know him from my neighbor's asshole.
I'm only pointing out that you guys are rushing to judgment and spreading unsupportable accusations about him, while having the incoherent gall to criticize the rest of us for not jumping in on the lynch mob.
So just to be clear, you started a thread about things that you have no evidence are true, but you assume are true, because, I dunno, Dems are corrupt, I guess? Whatever the reason, you're hung up on assumptions and suspicions, and are not confining yourself to the few facts that are known. Right? No waiting to learn the truth for you. Just jump straight to "he's obviously guilty of something."
And all that in a thread where you complain that the "lefties" are quiet about the matter.
Hard to keep up with your meanderings and ramblings.
We’re talking about the FBI, are we not? I do think people retire all the time, don’t they?Well, maybe if cosmic, then you, had not hijacked the thread with a wuttabout Oranato tangent, then it would easier to keep up.
Journalists? WTF are you talking about?Poor Danc, doesn’t even understand how journalists and reporting work. I’m sure he couldn’t go on the record. Bless your culty little heart.
You know who else has a lot of experience with journalists? Tim Tebow.Journalists? WTF are you talking about?
We’re talking about the FBI, are we not? I do think people retire all the time, don’t they?
Is this your way of telling us that you don't actually read the posts in threads you respond and engage with other posters in? You aren't aware that Hutchinson, Ornato and Engel were all interviewed by the Committee prior to Hutchinson testifying? And that afterwards Hutchinson ditched her MAGA appointed lawyer, contacted the Committee and informed them she wanted to actually testify?So why isn't he being subpoena'd to appear? Is the Committee scared he might call out the lying 26 year old?
Is this your way of telling us that you don't actually read the posts in threads you respond and engage with other posters in? You aren't aware that Hutchinson, Ornato and Engel were all interviewed by the Committee prior to Hutchinson testifying? And that afterwards Hutchinson ditched her MAGA appointed lawyer, contacted the Committee and informed them she wanted to actually testify?
The Committee already felt that Ornato and Engel had been less than truthful and that Hutchinson seemed a lot more forthright. She testified to things that both Ornato and Engel failed to mention, and her testimony was basically corroborated by the police officer who also testified about Trump's anger over not being allowed to go to the Capitol. If anyone is going to be exposed as lying it is Ornato and Engel, which is why neither have actually agreed to testify under oath.
However yesterday Ornato did exchange texts with NBC reporter Peter Alexander and indicated he was willing to work with the Committee.
"Is the Committee scared he might call out the lying 26 year old?"
This is such a bizarre take, since Hutchinson was a Trumper and friend of Ornato's who was originally subpoenaed by the Jan 6 Committee. After her initial interview she felt that there were events that weren't directly brought up that might make it look like she was withholding info if it was revealed by others to the Committee after they talked to her. So she arranged to testify and that was when she revealed what Ornato had told her about the incident in the SUV...
Again that was a shock to the public when she revealed it on National tv, but it was common gossip within the Secret Service ever since Jan 6. Ornato has been very careful to claim that the incident never occurred, but he's never denied telling Hutchinson about it, which is what she testified to. There is no reason to believe she made it up, and why would she create a fantasy about her friend?
She likely felt Ornato would reveal to the Committee that he told her about it, so she wanted to get out front and not appear to be holding back. Again she wasn't in the motorcade, her testimony was that Ornato told her what happened. Ornato is not going to ever deny under oath that he told her the story, because she has no reason to make it up and specifically name him in the first place. And like I said, the fact that Trump threw a fit was pretty much common knowledge within the SS post Jan 6...
So the domestic violence confrontations were in his home state (Texas) I guess? So the GA cops were apparently unaware of all the times Herschel had negative encounters with Texas police?Hershel was "serving the blue." I'm sure they appreciated his service.
So the domestic violence confrontations were in his home state (Texas) I guess? So the GA cops were apparently unaware of all the times Herschel had negative encounters with Texas police?
Seems impossible to believe that these cops in Cobb County would "welcome" the person described in this 2002 filed police report about a stalking incident in Texas if they knew it existed. So I've got to assume they didn't know anything about it. Otherwise they are guilty of a serious lapse in judgement. And possibly being a little overly star struck and letting that override common sense...
I wasn't "hijacking" the thread. He seemed to wonder why the only engagement was from him and Joe, and specifically referenced what the "leftists" were doing. I basically answered his question by mentioning just one of the many current news stories that most people "leftist or otherwise" might consider more engaging.Well, maybe if cosmic, then you, had not hijacked the thread with a wuttabout Oranato tangent, then it would easier to keep up.
DANC said:
Awfully quiet about it on the Leftist front.
I wasn't "hijacking" the thread. He seemed to wonder why the only engagement was from him and Joe, and specifically referenced what the "leftists" were doing. I basically answered his question by mentioning just one of the many current news stories that most people "leftist or otherwise" might consider more engaging.
And really, how "engaging" could the story have been, since as goat pointed out (and DANC admitted) he didn't actually even read the story himself? Seems to be a common theme with DANC, commenting on stories and articles (even ones he posted) that he's never bothered to actually read...
Now admittedly I didn't read the story either, because I freely admit I'm much more interested in Ornato's "retirement". But again I took DANC's post as asking why no one was engaging, so I posted my personal reason, to answer his question...
US Secret Service assistant director leaves agency after aide's explosive Jan. 6 testimony about him
US Secret Service Assistant Director Tony Ornato left the Secret Service on Monday, a significant departure two months after explosive testimony by a former White House aide, who alleged Ornato had told her then-President Donald Trump was irate upon learning his security detail wouldn't take him...
www.cnn.com
I wasn't "hijacking" the thread. He seemed to wonder why the only engagement was from him and Joe, and specifically referenced what the "leftists" were doing. I basically answered his question by mentioning just one of the many current news stories that most people "leftist or otherwise" might consider more engaging.
And really, how "engaging" could the story have been, since as goat pointed out (and DANC admitted) he didn't actually even read the story himself? Seems to be a common theme with DANC, commenting on stories and articles (even ones he posted) that he's never bothered to actually read...
Now admittedly I didn't read the story either, because I freely admit I'm much more interested in Ornato's "retirement". But again I took DANC's post as asking why no one was engaging, so I posted my personal reason, to answer his question...
US Secret Service assistant director leaves agency after aide's explosive Jan. 6 testimony about him
US Secret Service Assistant Director Tony Ornato left the Secret Service on Monday, a significant departure two months after explosive testimony by a former White House aide, who alleged Ornato had told her then-President Donald Trump was irate upon learning his security detail wouldn't take him...
www.cnn.com
100k deaths from fentanyl coming over the border every year and not a peep from Biden or the Democrats.
You guys are great at posting talking points (and nothing from actual doctors), but I was curious and did some digging...And it's all made in China. Who does Joe Biden work for?
Beyond the Hutchinson saga, he's likely involved in the whole disappearing texts fiasco. In fact, it's likely a significant portion of the missing texts are his...Wonder if the Trump mafia is trying to make him disappear before he turns on them.
No wonder I couldn't get any results when I googled. And yes, I freely admit I too did not bother to read the article DANC linked...Consider who you're dealing with. You don't have to look further than this thread for evidence of his oblivion. He obviously thought he was clever with the thread title. Problem is, though, that the FBI agent's last name is spelled entirely differently than the Heisman Trophy winner, so he completely missed the mark. Of course, the poster would have realized the names are spelled differently had he bothered to read the article that he linked.
Amazing.
I expect DANC to use terms like "Russia hoax", but I'd think you're more intelligent than that. Esp considering what we've come to find out about Trump's cavalier attitude towards documents he had no business removing from the WH in the first place...No. He started a thread with a factual statement about an FBI agent leaving and linked an article about it.
And the "waiting to learn the truth" stuff is rich after the Russia hoax.
They felt he was lying when they interviewed him before...Poor Zeke. You think you just show up at the Committee and ask to speak.
No, you have to be asked to testify. Evidently they didn't want to hear what he said.
Now run along.
I was initially "interested" and looked at the thread to see why Tim Tebow, who I didn't know was an FBI agent was leaving. I saw that there was only engagement between DANC and Joe, and surmised from DANC's posts that it had something to do with Hunter Biden. So I posted why I was far more interested in what another former law official was doing...You actually never answered him. Just linked an article. You didn't engage because I don't think you cared about Thibault. Didn't care enough to read the article. But DID care enough to post an article to divert from the subject line. To me, that's hijacking. And Zeke jumped on board.
If I don't care about a topic, I just don't engage. Pretty simple. As not to drag this on, let's disengage from this conversation. Don't want to be a hijacker.