Hunter. When they stole his laptop and showed his dick to America. Also wouldn't telling America that Hunter is an influence peddler despite not having any actual proof to that be actionable?
i'm not sure who "they" is but he wouldn't be the ideal candidate for "reputational harm."
He is apparently already sueing Gulliani for the stolen data portion.
there's a presumption for certain statemetns re sexual misconduct and theft i think. i don't know a lot about that stuff but usual reputation is what you claim has been harmed. with felony indictments his is already shit.
Also, they can show his dick all they want as long as it's part of their official congressional activities, and no one can do shit about it.
Well that's messed up. Even if the knew it had nothing to do with anything? Seems really wrong.
Speech and debate clause, mofo. Congress made sure they got the real free speech protection, before they even thought of a first amendment.
defamation of character?
Of all the dumb shit one can sue for, showing pictures of someones genitals to the world against their will seems like a slam dunk. I guess not.
Definitely seems like something Hunter should be suing for even if he already has a tarnished reputation.
you might be right about the pubs only releasing that which is favorable. i would think that's a rationale but not sure primary. i really don't know about this stuff but would presume he didn't want to sit and spend days going throuugh record after record and accoutn after account and phone call after phone call and meeting after meeting explaining them whereas in a public hearing time would be a limitation, presumably
The majority controls the official report, but anyone on the committee can release whatever they want.
The argument from you guys was that he was bribed for government favors, which does not go with the timeline. The ludicrous argument is being made by the Trumpster crowd.
You can stick the “you guys“ right up your rear. You are making a stupid argument by suggesting Joe is innocent because he had nothing to peddle the day he left office. If he was receiving money on the up & up from a foreign entity then he should be able to fully disclose that without any issue.
the timeline argument is patently stupid. as if you're divested of 50 years of contacts, connections, and good will the moment you walk out the door
What's dumb is the assumption that "You guys haven't proven your case" is the equivalent of "He must be innocent." If Joe did something wrong, let's find out about it. Let's prove it. You haven't.
the kid's dirty. the brother's dirty. joe lied about his knowledge and presence. take some depos and see what turns up. easy. and maybe joe forgot. he's old. hell maybe he takes hundreds of meetings like that. who knows. he might not be lying
Who is you? I have REPEATEDLY stated that I don’t know that he did. The argument that because he was out of office he must be innocent is dumb. Read better…
did get his 10% or whatever goes to the big guy. did he report it? pay taxes on it. is that why the irs whistleblowers' were thwarted from continuing their investigation. who knows
unfortunate that we've gone down this path as i suspect if you shine a light on any/most/many politicians they've got skeletons. i never gave a shit about any of this with biden, and still don't really, but the testimony of hte whistleblowers being blocked from leads that implicated biden is not cool. particularly while the dems have such a hard on to get trump. what's good for the goose... so f it.
McMurty has responded to this kind of willful ignorance repeatedly. Investigate, without interference.
You’re wrong. Go back & read posts. That is an argument being made here….
It’s an interesting problem. They all know Joe is guilty and they have a ton of evidence. All they need now is a full confession from Joe.
No, it's not. Again, saying that a case hasn't been proven yet isn't the same as saying affirmatively that someone is innocent.
You think I care if Biden is found to be corrupt? Of course I do, but the fact remains that there is no evidence connecting him to corruption.
TDS is a real thing, but it’s not me with TDS, it’s the Trumpsters who have become deranged with their slavish devotion to Trump.
The issue is not a presumption of innocence, it’s that he had nothing to offer due to a timeline of when he was or wasn’t in office.
Lol. You’ve got it worse than any Trumpster I know…
This is your prejudice showing. You have no idea whether there is “no” evidence. Depos haven’t even been taken.
Correct. That by virtue of being out of office he was instantly divested of 50 years of contacts and info. Life doesn’t work like that. There’s an entire body of law on former employees what they know what can be imputed
