So now what for Comer,Jordan and the others?
- Thread starter cosmickid
- Start date
Watch his health. If he pulls a Ron Jeremy we’ll know what 10 percent to the big guy meant
They've (the Trumpster Congressmen leading this hunt) have provide zero actual evidence that Joe is connected to Hunter's malfeasance. I have no prejudice in the case. I have no interest in defending Biden.
Something tells me, IF there were a Hunter Buyden flight log, Mr highlife would NOT want it to become public knowledge!
Like aggressively not want it to be public knowledge!
What don’t you understand about having to do an investigation? No one knows anything UNTIL AN INVESTIGATION IS CONCLUDED. Your trumper talks makes you sound prejudicial.
Uh what do think this was. I'm sure his dick pics were very instrumental to the case against him. Dws.
I don't disagree. Doesn't change that Comer and crew are knowingly lying about him. Not mistakenly. Not in the pursuit of truth. Just lying.
Hunter is a scum bag. He doesn't need other scum bags making shit up about him to prove that.
I've never said I was against an investigation. I said, investigate away, in fact. I'm afraid my party looks clownish and I don't like it.
Nonsense. The whistleblowers are credible and have been vindicated.
I didn't say anything about the whistleblowers in that post, but vindicated that Hunter Biden should have been more harshly punished? OK.
Correct. And they testified that leads to the family and joe were blocked. We already know Joe has lied about meetings and phone calls. So let’s see what the investigation yields
Ahem.
McCarthy begins the process
Kinda surprised it hasn't been brought up yet. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-speaker-kevin-mccarthy-announces-formal-impeachment-inquiry-president-biden Sounds like Gaetz has been putting pressure on McCarthy to get this started or he would basically get a few of his buddies to vote...
indiana.forums.rivals.com
Ahem.
McCarthy begins the process
Kinda surprised it hasn't been brought up yet. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-speaker-kevin-mccarthy-announces-formal-impeachment-inquiry-president-biden Sounds like Gaetz has been putting pressure on McCarthy to get this started or he would basically get a few of his buddies to vote...
That was the vote on having a vote on voting for an inquiry.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Sort of like how the J6 committee only showed edited versions of video?
Poor Hunter - such a victim.
Let's see Hunter's accountant(s) on the stand and see how they react when a perjury charge could be brought against them.
Bet some great things would come out of that!
So much willful ignorance. One day, you’ll be regretful and embarrassed.
No evidence! https://nypost.com/2023/12/13/news/...medium=site buttons&utm_campaign=site buttons
Except of course the words of the two IRS investigators (one reg Rep, one Dem). Biden just playing the stall game while the "impartial" minds here claim by all means if he's guilty then charge him, I don't care. All while he defies depositions and flaunts it in front of a gullible media proclaiming "no evidence". Half this board won't read the link, and continue to claim "no evidence". Other half knows this info has been out for a long time already.
Except of course the words of the two IRS investigators (one reg Rep, one Dem). Biden just playing the stall game while the "impartial" minds here claim by all means if he's guilty then charge him, I don't care. All while he defies depositions and flaunts it in front of a gullible media proclaiming "no evidence". Half this board won't read the link, and continue to claim "no evidence". Other half knows this info has been out for a long time already.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Hunter wants it public. Magadiots want it behind closed doors.
Ever wonder why? If the magadiots thought hunter was guilty then they would want it in public and parade it around.
They know full well they need to control what gets out so they can keep spinning it to their advantage
Deposition first, then public hearing. That's what the Pubs want. Easy to fillibuater questioning 5 min at a time and be done with it. A bit different when you're in front of legal counsel that knows this stuff more than Hunter does.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
1st) pubs offered public hearing and then changed their mind when hunter agreed to it.
2nd) given all the chicken republicans that refused their own subpoenas, they should just be happy with a public hearing
If hunter wanted to follow their lead and ignore subpoenas then they would have no room to complain
MAGA Pubs want to: 1) drag this out; and 2) spin, baby, spin!
Public hearings don't facilitate that.
Dem: Exactly what high crime are you intending to investigate? What is the allegation?
MAGA man: We need to investigate!
Dem: Exactly what high crime are you intending to investigate? What is the allegation?
MAGA man: We need to find out!
Dem: So you are fishing for any crime without any knowledge of what the crime is?
MAGA man: [crickets]
MAGA man: We need to investigate!
Dem: Exactly what high crime are you intending to investigate? What is the allegation?
MAGA man: We need to find out!
Dem: So you are fishing for any crime without any knowledge of what the crime is?
MAGA man: [crickets]
10% to the big guy, denying any involvement in his sons business dealings. Seems pretty cut and dry what they want to investigate. Again, no one here cares to refute the "10% to the big guy". If you had this on Trump you'd be all over it all day every day.
Last edited:
I modeled my reponse after your example, and how you respond to virtually any question - the laughing emoji...
I will remind you that it was that Daily Caller who used that term (not Weiss himself) in the article you linked. Also that the Chief of Field Operations testified that he decided to remove Shapley from the case in Dec 2022. after Weiss complained about him (Shapley) trying to tell Weiss how to do his job. The decision was at least partly based on the fact that Shapley had the reputation of being a hot head who sometimes rubbed people the wrong way...
Most people here don't refute the "10% to the big guy". The problem is, that's not illegal.
What is your basis of investigation of actions that Joe Biden has done in recompense for these supposed payments?
What policy change has Joe Biden implemented that helped those people who paid money to Hunter
What tax incentive was given?
What trade deal was made?
What was the "Quo" of this Quid-Pro-Quo?
If you can answer that, then you have the basis of an investigation that is worthy of a congressional deposition.
Otherwise, it's just a guy giving his dad money.
Last edited:
Huh? most don't refute 10% to the big guy. okay. recompense? what policy change implemented? he doesn't have to do any of htose things. the crime is accepting hte money. the bribe. you don't have to show fulfillment.
now the timing may be material. maybe even dispositive. but htat's why depos are needed not some goofy hearing with people shouting over each other
Sorry, I made the post, it gave me the "Oops" notification, I backed up, thought it had saved all the text and hit submit again.
I had to re-flesh it out. Please read again and then repost reponse.
He should be, but he won't...
DANC truly believes that the video footage from Jan 6 is apparently edited and spliced together. Any of the footage showing some scumbag hitting a cop with a flagpole, or spraying bear spray is actually some antifa member dessed up as the poor victimized Trumper. The poor tourist was just walking thru the Capitol and is somehow being blamed for the actual actions of someone impersonating him/her.
Ashli Babbitt isn't dead. She's locked up in some forgotten CIA jail cell. It was her stunt double who was shot...
Not to the people in Congress proposing the investigation. They could not articulate it at all. They only came up with some hems and haws.
"Lottery thoughts make a lot of fun. I'd put like $40 million into a trust for me and my family,"
Seriously, how often do you read "If I win the lottery, the first thing I'm going to do is buy my Mom and Dad a new house".
Why is it automatically assumed that Hunter giving money to his dad has to be for nefarious reasons?
by the guy i assumed you meant the person paying the 10% not hunter
"Lottery thoughts make a lot of fun. I'd put like $40 million into a trust for me and my family,"
Seriously, how often do you read "If I win the lottery, the first thing I'm going to do is buy my Mom and Dad a new house".
Why is it automatically assumed that Hunter giving money to his dad has to be for nefarious reasons?
I'd like to know how Joe reported that 10% on his tax returns. Firing of Ukrainian prosecutor from Joe's own mouth. Ever ask yourself why the 2nd most powerful man in the world was demanding a Ukrainian prosecutor be fired? Demanding it from his own lips? That seems like something oh someone from the state department can handle. And he told the guy to call Obama if he didn't believe him. Demanding a prosecutor be fired who was investigating the company Hunter was on the BOD...again it is really that simple.
Cosmic is. Posts 283 and 284 in this thread. And one of those is in response to Aloha who is doing the same thing.
Considering that Joe Biden releases his tax returns, I would think that would be pretty easy to figure out.
The President and Vice President release their 2020 tax returns | The White House
Today, the President released his 2020 federal income tax return, continuing an almost uninterrupted tradition. With this release, the President has
Because it was listed on his official briefing from the State Department as official United States policy?
Joe Biden impeachment claim questioned
A newly released document shows Joe Biden's push to remove the Ukrainian prosecutor general in 2015 was in line with U.S. government policy.
www.newsweek.com
And yet most reports indicate that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma and that the major reason that multiple countries were calling for his ouster was due to his office being rife with corruption and being bribed to look the other way with regards to companies owned by Russian / Ukranian oligarchs.
This item has been debunked already a dozen times and it still keeps getting repeated. For the record, Joe lied. It took 5 months for Shokin to be fired after Joe made his demand. That was after months of calls for his dismissal from not only foreign countries besides us but from Ukraine media itself.
Similar threads
