From deep research
And proceeds to reference ZeroHedge....
ZH could get something right, but it would be one of the few things, wouldn't it? Or should we assume you only follow its political suggestions and not its laughable market hypotheses?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From deep research
It knew it was fake when I heard "Let's Go Crazy"Dude you just posted a FAKE video that is making news due to the amount of stupid people who believed it. I wouldn't think you'd want to be putting your gullibility on display at this point in time...
"It's an awkward moment when a presidential candidate greets the audience at a rally and names the wrong state.
Fortunately for Democratic nominee Joe Biden, that didn't happen to him this week, despite a widely shared video that appears to show him saying “Hello, Minnesota” to a crowd in Florida.
It turns out he was, indeed, in Minnesota. The video that was shared had been altered to change the text on a sign and the podium to refer to Tampa, Florida, instead of Minnesota.
What you need to know about this edited video and the falsehoods spreading around it:
CLAIM: Video shows Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden mistakenly saying “Hello, Minnesota” at a campaign event in Tampa, Florida.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The sign behind Biden in this video has been edited to add the words “Tampa, Florida” and remove the words “TEXT MN to 30330.” The podium has also been edited to add “FL” instead of “MN.” Original video from this event confirms that Biden was in Minnesota and addressed the correct state in his greeting."
Video altered to make it look like Biden greeted wrong state
It's an awkward moment when a presidential candidate greets the audience at a rally and names the wrong state. Fortunately for Democratic nominee Joe Biden, that didn't happen to him this week, despite a widely shared video that appears to show him saying “Hello, Minnesota” to a crowd in...www.yahoo.com
Stick to football, pal.I don't normally post here and frankly don't plan to do so. The following is not based on what I want to be true but on what I believe to be true.
ZeroHedge looked at recent Polling Numbers in every State and then adjusted them by how far they were off in 2016. If history repeats - and I see no indication that any effort has been made to correct anything - then they project President Trump winning 279-259. (For those who don't know ZH is more libertarian - classical liberalism's kissing cousin - than conservative.)
Vegas, internal polls, momentum, minority trends, internet searches, oversampling Democrats & other metrics almost all point to a Trump win. Dare I say a comfortable Trump win. But of course Democrats who watch the mainstream media who got it wrong last time have all been told Biden is way ahead and they will be very, very hacked off if and when their collective bubble bursts again. This is very concerning because all civility has been lost and the two false left-right paradigm sides stopped communicating with each other years ago.
To be honest I'm holding my breath because I'm not sure the Republic can avert a major major crisis between tomorrow and the inauguration.
From deep research (again rooted in trying to find out what actually happened versus following the confirmation bias path of least resistance - looking for that which confirms what I already want / believe to be true - I assert that it is almost certain that Trump won the popular vote last time around, despite what the officially reported numbers say. This will rile people up but the truth is Hillary, after openly stealing the nomination from Bernie (even Democrats admit this), stole as many as five states in the General Election but still managed to lose. (One of the main ladies who reported this buried information is a life-long Democrat who just happens to have some intellectual integrity.)
Biden's problem is that when you lose an election by more than 10 points it becomes incredibly obvious if you try to steal it. It would take a lot of balls to try and and claim victory tomorrow (and in the coming week or two) but the DNC has shown in recent years that absolutely nothing is off limits for them.
Disclaimer: I've been immersed in the political 'dark arts' for 15 years. I have a track record of calling out both sides and irritating everybody. Strictly speaking I consider myself and independent. But I'm sure people will try to pigeon whole me because it reduces the cognitive dissonance. I'm not trying to be unkind, that's just what inevitably happens.
Thank you for the feedback but I write about football for fun, this is my wheelhouse.Stick to football, pal.
Are you trying to tell us you actually get paid for this drivel? People pay you to tell them that Trump won the popular vote in 2016???Thank you for the feedback but I write about football for fun, this is my wheelhouse.
Thank you for the feedback but I write about football for fun, this is my wheelhouse.
FIFYIf Trump pulls off the impossible, and do you have a prediction of the number of heads that explode on the Cooler?
If Trump loses as predicted by most I will feel sick Wednesday morning but show for work.
If BIDEN wins I guess we all have to hunker down for the oncoming war.
I promise...Kamala won't lead an army of socialist warriors down to your famous butcher shop, so no hunkering down necessary for you.If Trump wins I guess we all have to hunker down for the oncoming war.
And proceeds to reference ZeroHedge....
ZH could get something right, but it would be one of the few things, wouldn't it? Or should we assume you only follow its political suggestions and not its laughable market hypotheses?
Way too show up for work still. You are such a trooper.If Trump pulls off the impossible, and do you have a prediction of the number of heads that explode on the Cooler?
If Trump loses as predicted by most I will feel sick Wednesday morning but show for work.
If Trump wins I guess we all have to hunker down for the oncoming war.
Somebody has to count those beans...literally.Way too show up for work still. You are such a trooper.
Are you trying to tell us you actually get paid for this drivel? People pay you to tell them that Trump won the popular vote in 2016???
I stopped reading seriously at "Vicotry" [sic]I stopped reading by that point. Just another conspiracy theorist.
I don't normally post here and frankly don't plan to do so. The following is not based on what I want to be true but on what I believe to be true.
ZeroHedge looked at recent Polling Numbers in every State and then adjusted them by how far they were off in 2016. If history repeats - and I see no indication that any effort has been made to correct anything - then they project President Trump winning 279-259. (For those who don't know ZH is more libertarian - classical liberalism's kissing cousin - than conservative.)
Vegas, internal polls, momentum, minority trends, internet searches, oversampling Democrats & other metrics almost all point to a Trump win. Dare I say a comfortable Trump win. But of course Democrats who watch the mainstream media who got it wrong last time have all been told Biden is way ahead and they will be very, very hacked off if and when their collective bubble bursts again. This is very concerning because all civility has been lost and the two false left-right paradigm sides stopped communicating with each other years ago.
To be honest I'm holding my breath because I'm not sure the Republic can avert a major major crisis between tomorrow and the inauguration.
From deep research (again rooted in trying to find out what actually happened versus following the confirmation bias path of least resistance - looking for that which confirms what I already want / believe to be true - I assert that it is almost certain that Trump won the popular vote last time around, despite what the officially reported numbers say. This will rile people up but the truth is Hillary, after openly stealing the nomination from Bernie (even Democrats admit this), stole as many as five states in the General Election but still managed to lose. (One of the main ladies who reported this buried information is a life-long Democrat who just happens to have some intellectual integrity.)
Biden's problem is that when you lose an election by more than 10 points it becomes incredibly obvious if you try to steal it. It would take a lot of balls to try and and claim victory tomorrow (and in the coming week or two) but the DNC has shown in recent years that absolutely nothing is off limits for them.
Disclaimer: I've been immersed in the political 'dark arts' for 15 years. I have a track record of calling out both sides and irritating everybody. Strictly speaking I consider myself and independent. But I'm sure people will try to pigeon whole me because it reduces the cognitive dissonance. I'm not trying to be unkind, that's just what inevitably happens.
The Russians won the Cold War.I don't normally post here and frankly don't plan to do so. The following is not based on what I want to be true but on what I believe to be true.
ZeroHedge looked at recent Polling Numbers in every State and then adjusted them by how far they were off in 2016. If history repeats - and I see no indication that any effort has been made to correct anything - then they project President Trump winning 279-259. (For those who don't know ZH is more libertarian - classical liberalism's kissing cousin - than conservative.)
Vegas, internal polls, momentum, minority trends, internet searches, oversampling Democrats & other metrics almost all point to a Trump win. Dare I say a comfortable Trump win. But of course Democrats who watch the mainstream media who got it wrong last time have all been told Biden is way ahead and they will be very, very hacked off if and when their collective bubble bursts again. This is very concerning because all civility has been lost and the two false left-right paradigm sides stopped communicating with each other years ago.
To be honest I'm holding my breath because I'm not sure the Republic can avert a major major crisis between tomorrow and the inauguration.
From deep research (again rooted in trying to find out what actually happened versus following the confirmation bias path of least resistance - looking for that which confirms what I already want / believe to be true - I assert that it is almost certain that Trump won the popular vote last time around, despite what the officially reported numbers say. This will rile people up but the truth is Hillary, after openly stealing the nomination from Bernie (even Democrats admit this), stole as many as five states in the General Election but still managed to lose. (One of the main ladies who reported this buried information is a life-long Democrat who just happens to have some intellectual integrity.)
Biden's problem is that when you lose an election by more than 10 points it becomes incredibly obvious if you try to steal it. It would take a lot of balls to try and and claim victory tomorrow (and in the coming week or two) but the DNC has shown in recent years that absolutely nothing is off limits for them.
Disclaimer: I've been immersed in the political 'dark arts' for 15 years. I have a track record of calling out both sides and irritating everybody. Strictly speaking I consider myself and independent. But I'm sure people will try to pigeon whole me because it reduces the cognitive dissonance. I'm not trying to be unkind, that's just what inevitably happens.
Glad you’re finally showing your true colors, dropping all civility.hahahahahahaha if you have to ask...idiot.
Does prognosticate mean jam your nose up your ass with a pogo stick?Please come back after the election so we can discuss your prognostication.
@UncleMark Mostly not. I have had a day job my whole professional life and ran a free blog on the side for many years. I have a degree in Journalism from IU but had no interest in working for a place where a certain worldview that I don't share is assumed. I did consult for a two-time New York Times best-selling author off and on for two years and co-edited his subscription Newsletter letter for I think it was as a year. I also made my money back and then some on a book I wrote but I was never looking for commercial success. I probably gave away 20 percent of the inventory plus almost as many digital copies. And I put out a free film that was viewed a few hundred thousand times. So the short answer is no not really.
I spit out my coffee when reading OP referring to ZeroHedge.
What a clown.
No.Thank you for asking. Well first and foremost I don't mean that I approve of such practices. In fact I have a visceral revulsion to said 'dark arts' but not liking them doesn't mean they don't exist.
In a nutshell I would say this. Probably the essence of Sun Tzu's Art of War is that all warfare is based on deception. Politics, especially in the 21st century, is information warfare and the philosophies of high level political warfare are no different.
This means to find out what the truth is we have to get beyond the surface level for-public-consumption narratives pushed by the corporate media, political establishment and 101 level Political Science classes. To do this we have to understand the guiding philosophies and cosmologies that drive the direction the powers that be are trying to take us in - Humanism, Post-Modernism, Progressivism, Technocracy and yes Globalism - being predominant among them.
It's also true that history has been written by the winners. So you have to go back and try and figure out what actually happened versus what we are told happened. If you don't understand occult-based secret societies that go all the way back to ancient Sumer you are going to miss a huge piece of the puzzle.
Once we understand these philosophies, cosmologies and what the real goals are we can look at the landscape of politics, economics and spirituality and begin to see what is really going on.
If Trump wins I guess we all have to hunker down for the oncoming war.
That metaphor is wrong. Trump drew an inside royal flush.Something else to keep in mind... NONE of the states that HRC lost in 2016 showed her with a 50% or > lead going into election day. Late-breaking Undecideds and 3rd parties were a Huge reason Trump drew his inside straight on election day 2016. That will not be occurring this year, esp with all those banked votes...
Were you basing your call on official reports?I hate FoxNews overall. And also I called Florida last time literally 4 hours before Fox did because it was super obvious. Trump was up by more votes than there were projected left to come in but nobody would do it. It was super ridiculous.
Bulk knows I was kidding. You are an idiot. Not kidding.Glad you’re finally showing your true colors, dropping all civility.
QEDBulk knows I was kidding. You are an idiot. Not kidding.
We all know who is ready to
1) bring in the lawyers to attack every vote, after the fact
2) call on his armed thugs to mobilize
There may well be a war (God, I hope not) but if so it will be the people vs. the brainwashed right wing goon squad.
Civilization is a social construct anyway. Sad to see so many losing their grip.Trump very well may win. And that's fine. He is not my horse but I wont lose any sleep. However, your summation is well... I'll just be nice and say "ok buddy, ok".
I haven't ventured over there in years and it appears to have really lost its following or republications after the market continue to set record highs in face of its continuous call for a collapse
Glad you’re finally showing your true colors, dropping all civility.
WhiplashDoes prognosticate mean jam your nose up your ass with a pogo stick?
What are you talking about? He's the Pennsylvania AG who is a democrat and has been bombarded by baseless law suits and is rightly pissed that Trump is trying to wrongly sew doubt in the process. I think you have the wrong person who is not trying to play fair.
Prove it! Don't say baseless shit and expect us to believe it. Trump is the ONLY Presidential candidate who has ever screamed fraud and said that he will take it to the SCOTUS. Oh, and your democratic friends who have said this doesn't count. I need legitimate democratic political figures who have said they won't accept the outcome if they lose to Trump.The Dems have been saying for a year that if Trump wins they will challenge and that they will simply not accept defeat no matter what. But that if Trump challenges in any way it is not acceptable. You can't have it both ways (unless you have no first principles).
Please, don't stop!A lot of people, including ZH, have been forecasting economic collapse for a long time. The fact that they have been doing so for so long and it hasn't happened is a fair critique. One I've had myself. I don't consider Mises to be crackpot and I choose them over Keynes.
Overall I believe ZH is right on the fundamentals but I do think that the ability for the Fed to keep things afloat through their modern day alchemy has been greatly underestimated.
The World Economic Forum says quite openly that they want a great reset next year and I don't see how you get there without imploding the U.S. Economy first.
At least he's not an MSNBC host or a Contributing Editor at Politico:
Rudy Giuliani 'Texts' to College Student Are Fake, Dupe Maddow
Supposed text messages posted by college student Nick Roberts onto Twitter allegedly sent to President Donald Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani are not real.www.mediaite.com
Prove it! Don't say baseless shit and expect us to believe it. Trump is the ONLY Presidential candidate who has ever screamed fraud and said that he will take it to the SCOTUS. Oh, and your democratic friends who have said this doesn't count. I need legitimate democratic political figures who have said they won't accept the outcome if they lose to Trump.
What are you talking about? He's the Pennsylvania AG who is a democrat and has been bombarded by baseless law suits and is rightly pissed that Trump is trying to wrongly sew doubt in the process. I think you have the wrong person who is not trying to play fair.
That metaphor is wrong. Trump drew an inside royal flush.
That is just so wrong. Bad reach. Bad.This is very Barr of him