Right, I think the immunities are congruent. But I’m willing to consider any case you cite that makes the distinction .I commented on the distinction between Tort (civil) and Criminal.
Agreed. The order was well within Obama’s essential job description. As contrasted with Clinton lying about a BJ.. The Supreme Court had already ruled that that the Fourth and Fifth Amendments do not apply to the military use of deadly force under the AUMF." If the Fifth Amendment did apply (which the court said it didn't because Al Awlaki and others were considered enemy combatants (which I said earlier)), the killing would have been a clear violation of due process on the Fifth Amendment. I would urge you to read the two opinions on this and how nobody argued "even if this is true, we still have immunity for criminal acts."
Think of a target. The bullseye is immune, the outermost ring is not immune. Where the line is is vital to any discussion about immunity. The CA totally ignored this in its Trump opinion.