ADVERTISEMENT

Moscow shooting

I commented on the distinction between Tort (civil) and Criminal.
Right, I think the immunities are congruent. But I’m willing to consider any case you cite that makes the distinction .
. The Supreme Court had already ruled that that the Fourth and Fifth Amendments do not apply to the military use of deadly force under the AUMF." If the Fifth Amendment did apply (which the court said it didn't because Al Awlaki and others were considered enemy combatants (which I said earlier)), the killing would have been a clear violation of due process on the Fifth Amendment. I would urge you to read the two opinions on this and how nobody argued "even if this is true, we still have immunity for criminal acts."
Agreed. The order was well within Obama’s essential job description. As contrasted with Clinton lying about a BJ.

Think of a target. The bullseye is immune, the outermost ring is not immune. Where the line is is vital to any discussion about immunity. The CA totally ignored this in its Trump opinion.
 
I'm always baffled by the dopey question of "where does it say abortion in the Constitution". The Constitution of course does not mention abortion. Nor does it mention that you have a right to watch porn, which you no doubt would say "that is my constitutional right". And it is, because the Supreme Court said it was, despite the fact that it wasn't mentioned in the Constitution. Nor does it say you have the right to travel, and on and on. These tired old canards simply don't fly.

The Ninth Amendment was James Madison's doing to ensure that the Bill of Rights (and Constitution) is not seen as granting to the people of the United States only the specific rights it addressed. The language could not be more clear. Justice Goldberg,citing Madison was very clear on this in that the 9th Amendment “shows a belief of the Constitution’s authors that fundamental rights exist that are not expressly enumerated in the first eight amendments and an intent that the list of rights included there not be deemed exhaustive". His concuring opinion in Griswold (no doubt you ought to appreciate--the right to buy and use contraceptives), was then used --along with the 14th Amendment, to provide certain rights not specifically referenced in the Constitution but contemplated as exisiting. In the example of abortion, in English colonies, women had the right to abortion up to the time of the quickening--i.e,. the time the women feels the baby move in the uterus. Ben Franklin wrote abortion recipes in several books, and commentary from that time period was very clear--it was a woman's choice. Unless of course you were a black slave woman, then the woman had no right to anything.

So the next time you are sitting in front of your computer watching pornhub and wearing your anal beads, you should take a deep breath, and give thanks to the Supreme Court for keeping you out of jail because of your purient interests.
What did you make of Alito's recitation in Dobbs of the history of the LAW vis-a-vis the legality of abortion - in the US and elsewhere? Accurate? Inaccurate? Mixed? Irrelevant?
 
New information coming to light:

The Leviathan is currently borrowing $85k per second, and now is adding $1 trillion in New debt every 95 days.

The last two spending bills include some interesting items in addition to the ones I posted earlier:

$388k to Columbia University.
( on background, Columbia charges $12,500 to prospective students for a three week Summer preparatory session. Columbia has an endowment of $12.6 Billion)

$1.5 million to encourage video gaming in New York

$1 million to Cambridge, Massachusetts, to install solar panels on a Community Center.

$249k to the Baltimore Symphony.

$2 Million to build a kelp and shellfish nursery in Maine.

$1 Million to Martha's Vineyard Hospital.

DOUBLED the budget of The National Science Foundation, which recently paid for:

$1 Million to study if Sunfish are more aggressive if given tequila or gin.

$750k to determine if Japanese quail are more sexually active when fed cocaine.

The last two spending bills combined included 7,000 earmarks totaling $14 Billion

ALL BORROWED!
$14 billion. Cut everything you’ve listed, except the aid for Ukraine which most support except for the crazies among MAGA. I’m all for it, but you’re cutting spending by only about 00000226 percent. You’re not serious about reducing spending and neither is the MAGA faction in Congress. They’re unserious clowns.
 
Last edited:
and while i'm gambling and guessin i'll predict that it's possible the composition of the court makes a difference but using instincts/the smell test trump's acts do not give rise to immunity and do not constitute official acts as contemplated

💯. smell test/gut instinct, rarely wrong.
 
and while i'm gambling and guessin i'll predict that it's possible the composition of the court makes a difference but using instincts/the smell test trump's acts do not give rise to immunity and do not constitute official acts as contemplated
I think the court has got three options once it determines the President has absolute immunity for the essential job functions.

Rule there is or is not immunity based upon an analysis of essential job functions, or remand for an evidentiary hearing on that point. Because so much of a president’s time these days is campaigning, addressing supporters in public places, and fundraising, a ruling that those activities have no immunity could be a very big deal.
 
Last edited:
$14 billion. Cut everything you’ve listed, except the aid for Ukraine which most support except for the crazies among MAGA. I’m all for it, but you’re cutting spending by only about 00000226 percent. You’re not serious about reducing spending and neither is the MAGA faction in Congress. They’re unserious clowns.
The examples were posted to illustrate the problem, not quantify the problem.
I would cut the entire Dept. Of Education...down to the junior janitors. Homeland Security broken down into it's original components, then decentralized throughout the country.
All federal departments would be reduced by hiring freezes, competency reviews and audits of every dime spent anywhere.
The Pentagon would be audited and the budget reduced 3% annually for at least ten years.

That is year one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcmurtry66
The examples were posted to illustrate the problem, not quantify the problem.
I would cut the entire Dept. Of Education...down to the junior janitors. Homeland Security broken down into it's original components, then decentralized throughout the country.
All federal departments would be reduced by hiring freezes, competency reviews and audits of every dime spent anywhere.
The Pentagon would be audited and the budget reduced 3% annually for at least ten years.

That is year one.
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT