ADVERTISEMENT

Judge puts Trump out of business in NY?

Case in point. Not to mention the crap they found on his wife and sons social media accounts. Comical but you keep defending it. You know what they say, if the suit fits...Looks good on you. LMAO
Defending what? I’m just trying to shoot down stupidity.

You know that one isn’t a criminal trial? The idiot you linked doesn’t, so I’d guess you also don’t.
 
Defending what? I’m just trying to shoot down stupidity.

You know that one isn’t a criminal trial? The idiot you linked doesn’t, so I’d guess you also don’t.
I know its not...It doesn't matter, I'm tired of all the obvious bullshit. You would have to be an msm monkey to think otherwise.
 
Victor Davis Hanson is an idiot?
I have three or four VDH books. I like him as a historian and writer. However, if his stuff is what you pasted in the post I responded to, it was idiotic.

I haven’t figured out if defending Trump requires a person to pretend to be an idiot, or whether idiots defend Trump. I’m guessing it’s some of both.
 
I have three or four VDH books. I like him as a historian and writer. However, if his stuff is what you pasted in the post I responded to, it was idiotic.

I haven’t figured out if defending Trump requires a person to pretend to be an idiot, or whether idiots defend Trump. I’m guessing it’s some of both.
Tds man. Cmon aloha. What could be worse than Biden? And I posted the entire tweet he delivered because it was so well written.
 
I have three or four VDH books. I like him as a historian and writer. However, if his stuff is what you pasted in the post I responded to, it was idiotic.

I haven’t figured out if defending Trump requires a person to pretend to be an idiot, or whether idiots defend Trump. I’m guessing it’s some of both.
It might be. But that doesn’t foreclose another option: intelligent people can also defend Trump’s policies or presidency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
It might be. But that doesn’t foreclose another option: intelligent people can also defend Trump’s policies or presidency.
I’ve defended some of his policies because they were good. He, as a person, cannot be defended. He is by far the worst person, in terms of character, elected President in my lifetime. He took Clinton’s place for that dubious honor. He’s unfit for the office and it’s a national embarrassment he ever served in it.
 
So basically you got nothing in terms of an explanation.
Gag orders on a defendant are virtually unheard of in American law. Al Capone threatening to kill the judge or putting hits out on anyone on the jury is basically the only scenario where a gag order on a defendant would be Constitutional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Ya know I would expect a guy with a dumbass name like DC Draino to be an actual dumbass and not know the difference between a single judge issuing a temporary stay and an actual Appeals Court ruling...

But do you not know the difference? Do you not ever check out a link before you post it? I mean it's right there in his tweet, the actual story says a judge lifted it, and he just brazenly lies and says it was an appeals court.

"A gag order that barred Donald Trump from commenting about court personnel after he disparaged a law clerk in his New York civil fraud trial was temporarily lifted Thursday by an appellate judge who raised free speech concerns.

Judge David Friedman of the state’s intermediate appeals court issued what’s known a stay — suspending the gag order and allowing the former president to freely comment about court staff while a longer appeals process plays out."

 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
Gag orders on a defendant are virtually unheard of in American law. Al Capone threatening to kill the judge or putting hits out on anyone on the jury is basically the only scenario where a gag order on a defendant would be Constitutional.
Search “how common are gag orders?” and a ton of articles pop up. The first one literally says, “Gag orders are a common occurrence in high-profile cases.“ Every article I clicked said pretty much the same thing.

I assume everything you post and link is false until verified. Almost nothing you post checks out.
 
Last edited:
You've got to be a winner to understand Mark.

There is not a doubt in my mind that you and DANC were just about as shocked the night of the 22 midterms, as you were on election night 2012 when Obama was re-elected.

Relevant because this is what the guy who directed that winning campaign says about the polls you continue to cite.

I imagine you predicted Trump to win in 2016 (the blind squirrel/ nut eventuality). But seriously, since 2008 (so going on 16 yrs) exactly how many POTUS elections have you predicted correctly, been on the winning side on?

 
Ya know I would expect a guy with a dumbass name like DC Draino to be an actual dumbass and not know the difference between a single judge issuing a temporary stay and an actual Appeals Court ruling...

But do you not know the difference? Do you not ever check out a link before you post it? I mean it's right there in his tweet, the actual story says a judge lifted it, and he just brazenly lies and says it was an appeals court.

"A gag order that barred Donald Trump from commenting about court personnel after he disparaged a law clerk in his New York civil fraud trial was temporarily lifted Thursday by an appellate judge who raised free speech concerns.

Judge David Friedman of the state’s intermediate appeals court issued what’s known a stay — suspending the gag order and allowing the former president to freely comment about court staff while a longer appeals process plays out."

It doesn't matter that you cant comprehend and it came from an appeals court its all going away anyways. Its BS
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
It doesn't matter that you cant comprehend and it came from an appeals court its all going away anyways. Its BS
It's because he's always thinking about me. Every one of his posts includes some reference to me. It's just creepy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indianaftw
Search “how common are gag orders?” and a ton of articles pop up. The first one literally says, “Gag orders are a common occurrence in high-profile cases.“ Every article I clicked said pretty much the same thing.

I assume everything you post and link is false until verified. Almost nothing you post checks out.
On the defendant? I was talking about the defendant hence the Al Capone reference.
 
On the defendant?
Don’t try to weasel your way out of being wrong again. On the defense most often and sometimes also on the defendant. Skim through a few of those articles and see for yourself. Given Trump has zero self discipline (poor trait for someone who wants to be President) can’t stop talking - it’s no surprise he’s one of those defendants warranting one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrBing
Search “how common are gag orders and a ton of articles pop up. The first one literally says, “Gag orders are a common occurrence in high-profile cases.“ Every article I clicked said pretty much the same thing.

I assume everything you post and link is false until verified. Almost nothing you post checks out.
What he meant to say is that a former US POTUS engaging in such spurious conduct that he faces felony indictments in multiple jurisdictions being put under a gag order hardly ever happens. Of course there's always a first time...
 
Gag orders on a defendant are virtually unheard of in American law. Al Capone threatening to kill the judge or putting hits out on anyone on the jury is basically the only scenario where a gag order on a defendant would be Constitutional.
It is also unheard of for a defendant to attack a clerk on social media and likely very unusual for a defendant to have a plethora of loyal followers willing to threaten harm to anyone the defendant wiggles his pudgy finger at.
 
It's because he's always thinking about me. Every one of his posts includes some reference to me. It's just creepy.
No I mentioned you because you "liked" a post which referenced a demonstrably false assertion. When Clarence Thomas issued a temporary hold on the Grand Jury subpoena for Lindsey Graham in the GA case, that was not a SCOTUS ruling. In fact Thomas issued that temporary hold on Oct 24, 2022 yet less than a month later on Nov 2022, Lindsey's butt was in court...

That's what temporary means...
 
No I mentioned you because you "liked" a post which referenced a demonstrably false assertion. When Clarence Thomas issued a temporary hold on the Grand Jury subpoena for Lindsey Graham in the GA case, that was not a SCOTUS ruling. In fact Thomas issued that temporary hold on Oct 24, 2022 yet less than a month later on Nov 2022, Lindsey's butt was in court...

That's what temporary means...
👆

Literally makes my point
 
Your source is an idiot and you’re a dupe.
VDH an idiot? I would’ve thought he’d be right up your alley.

Victor Davis Hanson is a professor emeritus of Classics at California State University, Fresno, the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow in classics and military history at the Hoover Institution at Stanford, and visiting professor at Hillsdale College. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and was a presidential appointee in 2007–2008 on the American Battle Monuments Commission.
 
Last edited:
VDH an idiot? I would’ve thought he’d be right up your ally.

Victor Davis Hanson is a professor emeritus of Classics at California State University, Fresno, the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow in classics and military history at the Hoover Institution at Stanford, and visiting professor at Hillsdale College. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and was a presidential appointee in 2007–2008 on the American Battle Monuments Commission.
I’ve already said I like VDH as a historian and writer. I have three of his books in my library.

What was linked was idiotic.
 
Don’t try to weasel your way out of being wrong again. On the defense most often and sometimes also on the defendant. Skim through a few of those articles and see for yourself. Given Trump has zero self discipline (poor trait for someone who wants to be President) can’t stop talking - it’s no surprise he’s one of those defendants warranting one.
Almost never ever on the defendant. Ever. But I guess Trump has those far left NY appellate judges in his pocket 🤣
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT