Total bad faith posting. Everything I posted was from or confirmed by the Durham Report.
Hunter Biden charged.
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
It’s written as if English is your second language and you are at maybe first grade level. It doesn’t make any sense.
If I recall, Patel is running against Trump.
The ridicule is on you if you claim Trump 'bought them out'. You and Hickory.....
What? Are you drinking heavily or something? You’re not making sense so taking a break might be a good idea for you.
Hunter Biden's attorney slams IRS whistleblower's 'illegal' release of WhatsApp message to Chinese businessman
Hunter Biden's attorney responded to an Internal Revenue Service whistleblower who claimed that his client sent a 2017 message on WhatsApp which invoked his father's name.
"Biased and politically-motivated, selective leaks have plagued this matter for years. They are not only irresponsible, they are illegal. A close examination of the document released publicly yesterday by a very biased individual raises serious questions over whether it is what he claims it to be. It is dangerously misleading to make any conclusions or inferences based on this document," Clark said. "The DOJ investigation covered a period which was a time of turmoil and addiction for my client."
So the text was real.
Clark also said that "[a]ny verifiable words or actions of my client in the midst of a horrible addiction are solely his own and have no connection to anyone in his family."
And Hunter is going to try and fall on the "I was a sick crackhead who was totes lying about my Dad" defense. We know the money was getting laundered through LLCs to the family and we know Hunter complained to family members about having to be the family's breadwinner.
The Bidens are crooks. Period. He easn't the principled vote some of you thought he was. He was a damned crook who has run his administration about as far from "conservative" as you could possibly get. No norms were restored. There is no calm hand at the wheel.
All the attacks on Durham are attacks on Democracy then, because he works for the DoJ.
What a conundrum!
It was obfuscation. You don't get points for that.
Everything I posted was factual - you just don't like to admit it.
You're becoming more and more like Cosmic all the time - word salad to try to appear legit.
I was talking to Joe Hoopsier, so I guess you’re him too. Makes sense to make up a fake person to agree with you since so few do.
You were wrong, as usual. You will not admit it, as usual. You have no shame. Time to move on again. Out.
Oooooh, you're venturing into DANC-crazy talk now.Hunter Biden's attorney slams IRS whistleblower's 'illegal' release of WhatsApp message to Chinese businessman
Hunter Biden's attorney responded to an Internal Revenue Service whistleblower who claimed that his client sent a 2017 message on WhatsApp which invoked his father's name.www.foxnews.com
"Biased and politically-motivated, selective leaks have plagued this matter for years. They are not only irresponsible, they are illegal. A close examination of the document released publicly yesterday by a very biased individual raises serious questions over whether it is what he claims it to be. It is dangerously misleading to make any conclusions or inferences based on this document," Clark said. "The DOJ investigation covered a period which was a time of turmoil and addiction for my client."
So the text was real.
Clark also said that "[a]ny verifiable words or actions of my client in the midst of a horrible addiction are solely his own and have no connection to anyone in his family."
And Hunter is going to try and fall on the "I was a sick crackhead who was totes lying about my Dad" defense. We know the money was getting laundered through LLCs to the family and we know Hunter complained to family members about having to be the family's breadwinner.
The Bidens are crooks. Period. He easn't the principled vote some of you thought he was. He was a damned crook who has run his administration about as far from "conservative" as you could possibly get. No norms were restored. There is no calm hand at the wheel.
I hope you don't have to defend your post against the likes of Aloha.
You replied to me. You are losing it. Hitting the bottle hard tonight?
Some
At least you didn't deny Hickory is wrong.
Last edited:
Lol Patel running against Trump doesn't prove anything.If I recall, Patel is running against Trump.
The ridicule is on you if you claim Trump 'bought them out'. You and Hickory.....
Why were the whistleblowers being bought out regardless?
Paying them to tell people what they want them to say
I explained to you that the whistleblowers were facing financial ruin.
They weren't paid to say anything but the truth.
Sure they were lmao.
Flip the parties and tell me how much you would believe their shit after taking payment.
VanPastorMan
Hall of Famer
So besides the dossier what proof was there that Trump had Russian prostitutes urinate on a bed?
Lol prove their shit was legit. You can't. Burden of proof is on accuser.
They were paid off. Period. If it was about bringing out the truth, you wouldn't need to pay them
It’s safe to say the dossier was full of falsehoods and misinformation. I always doubted it. However, given Trump’s history of womanizing, adultery, dishonesty and greed, it’s easy to see why many thought it was likely to be true. Let’s assume that all the women (I believe the number is around 26) who have accused Trump of sexual assault or sexual misbehavior are liars. My question to you as a pastor is how do you reconcile your faith with your support for such a major sinner?
Hahahahaha. Hilarious. Troll score 5 or name one person in any political office that you could say pretty good person. Answer NONE
Here's what's sad. They all believe in this guy. We could sit here and list all his history, it doesn't matter. It's a freaking joke all of it. It's beyond comical. Imagine a few years down the road. Really think about it. Seriously, we are already so wasted away and on a bold faced out in the open road to perdition it's sickening and disgusting. I guess this is the set up for what the Bible says will take place. All good!
VanPastorMan
Hall of Famer
It is because Hillary Clinton was even more of a monster. She loves abortion and big government. Trump, as you say has a ton of flaws. But I have thought that rich people have different challenges than the rest of us. I am not saying they are all liars. I could see them all being liars because they see Trump as a cash cow. For instance the porn woman had testified earlier that they did not have sex. Trump said they did not have sex. So why did she change her story? It is money signs. Trump won a law suit against her and she now owes him over 250k.
Trump's conduct, throughout his entire adult life, has been reprehensible. He's the most immoral man to ever occupy the White House. You know it. I know it. The whole world knows it. So the only thing you and your brethren can do, and the way you rationalize it, is you resort to whatabouts. What about Hillary, that "lover" of abortion? What about Bill? What about JFK? Lame, Van.
Kudos, though, for a novel theory - - the "rich guy" defense. He gets a pass because "rich people have different challenges." They sure do. The bible says it's harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of Heaven than it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. Trump's got some serious work to do. Maybe he should start giving his wealth away, like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. Trumpy needs to sign that Giving Pledge. Otherwise things are going to be heating up for him bigly.
I'm sure Trump was completely satisfied with just a little Tete-a-tete with Stormy for the 16k he paid her.
It's incredible how these "Christians" will twist themselves into a pretzel in an effort to justify this guy's behavior.
Wait, what?
This is the same exact alleged message that dbmhoosier claimed (in Post No. 138 above) was a text message, not WhatsApp.
So now you're saying Hunter Biden laboriously typed the same lengthy message twice (with no inconsistent typos) and then sent it both by text and also by What'sApp.
Why would anyone do that?
If you really have the recipient's actual cell phone number to allow you to send a text message, there's no reason to send it a second time.
Latest posts
-
-
-
Can government policy end, or significantly decrease, childhood trauma?- Latest: Baller23Boogie
-
