You haven't believed any other named whistleblowers. Why start now?
Hunter Biden charged.
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
No they don't that's the new norm.Do you folks on left care at all about this?
IRS whistleblowers allege sweeping political interference in Hunter Biden case
The conduct of prosecutors on the case “has honestly been appalling,” said one of the whistleblowers.www.politico.com
That was my point. Why wait? You don't believe evidence when it's presented.
But you do believe rumors spread by Democrats and the media.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
The other whistleblowers were paid off by Trump. Why should we believe them?
Would you believe whistleblowers if you found out they were paid off by Biden?
Nope
They swallow it like Debbie Does Dallas. It's actually pretty comical. Worth looking in on from time to time
So would you compare this with the Steele Dossier? Hillary paid for it so it was untrustworthy. Right?
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
If all we had was the dossier, then sure.
But that dossier opened up the door to a lot of other evidence. More than just paid off whistleblowers.
Nice try though
Not according to the Durham report. There was no basis for an investigation.
Why don't your trust the DoJ?
We all enjoy your pop-in drive-by posts.They swallow it like Debbie Does Dallas. It's actually pretty comical. Worth looking in on from time to time
Keep up the good work!
I can believe they have a different opinion on how Biden should have been dealt with. All we have now are their stated opinions.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Simple Google search.
Revealed: Jim Jordan's FBI 'whistleblowers' were paid by Trump ally and spread J6 conspiracy theories
A trio of witnesses being called as "whistleblowers" by the GOP committee investigating the "weaponization" of government were paid off by a Trump ally and spread conspiracy theories, reported The New York Times on Thursday."The first three witnesses to testify privately before the new...
www.rawstory.com
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Lol I did. But then I don’t work for a conservative propaganda site so of course you don't believe me lol
You continue to misrepresent the Durham Report. Here's a link to where you can read it yourself if you want. It's 306 pages and I haven't read every page, but I've read several key parts:
The investigation didn't start because of the Steele Dossier as you've said many times. It started when the FBI received information from Australia on July 28, 2016 concerning comments reportedly made in a tavern on May 6, 2016 by George Papadopoulos, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to the Trump campaign. Specifically, that Russia had dirt on HRC in the form of embarrassing emails they had stolen. Of course the FBI soon learned that was true since they shortly thereafter began leaking them to WikiLeaks. The DOJ IG and bipartisan Senate committee found and reported that as well. Durham mentions Papdopoulos 229 times in this report and specifically says on page 8 and 9 that it was the cause for FBI opening the "full" investigation:
The Opening of Crossfire Hurricane As set forth in greater detail in Section IV, the record in this matter reflects that upon receipt of unevaluated intelligence information from Australia, the FBI swiftly opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
On page 8 and elsewhere he makes it clear that all the above was about Papadopoulous running his mouth to a Australian Diplomat over drinks in a tavern. The investigation started with him and spread to Flynn, Page and Manafort initially.
The Steele Dossier was used to support a FISA warrant concerning Carter Page and it shouldn't have been, but that alone does not in any way make the Mueller investigation illegitimate. It wasn't the cause for opening the investigation as you've stated. None of the Mueller findings were based on the Steele Dossier, not even a little bit. Durham himself never says in his report that the Mueller investigation was illegitimate or that its findings were incorrect. What Durham's beef boils down to is that he didn't think the FBI should have opened a "full" investigation when it did, but that it should instead have launched a preliminary investigation instead. He thinks it should have investigated the initial allegations leads and evidences first. That includes the Papadopoulous thing and other evidence like multiple contacts between Russian officials and agents and Trump campaign personnel - Durham himself lays this out in his report). The Republican leadership of the FBI, the DOJ IG and the bipartisan Senate committee all disagree with Durham about whether a full investigation should have been launched rather than a preliminary investigation. Given all that was subsequently found and the convictions that resulted does anyone with two brain cells to rub together really think that starting with a preliminary investigation would have prevented the full investigation?
Last edited:
Um...didn't you ask him to respond?
Do you folks on left care at all about this?
IRS whistleblowers allege sweeping political interference in Hunter Biden case
The conduct of prosecutors on the case “has honestly been appalling,” said one of the whistleblowers.
As acting as a CIA operative, which starts the DC Snake, eating it's own tail, which ended up being that the CIA (as the over lord of all of this) manipulating the masses.......... JUST LIKE THEY are tasked to do... but it wasn't supposed to be US people... only other country's stupid liberals.
But you already know this, you are a republican. Just thought I'd add to your story. Carry on.
You've previously and correctly identified him as a bad faith poster. He proves it every day. In the "Trump Indicted" thread he claimed today that the FBI has never been to Biden's and Pence's residences in connection with documents. That's patently false.
He doesn't give a shit about facts, just themes and narratives. He'll fabricate facts to fit his bizarre and baseless narratives.
It's pointless to engage in a lengthy exchange with this troubled individual. Best to just call out his lies and bullshit and move on.
Just another accounting error, Nothing to see here. Please Pentagon on.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Stoll wants to have an echo chamber of conservative ideas but can't find truth social
Your own link proves you're lying. Trump didn't pay them and the reason they got money was because they lost their jobs because they came forward.Simple Google search.
Revealed: Jim Jordan's FBI 'whistleblowers' were paid by Trump ally and spread J6 conspiracy theories
A trio of witnesses being called as "whistleblowers" by the GOP committee investigating the "weaponization" of government were paid off by a Trump ally and spread conspiracy theories, reported The New York Times on Thursday."The first three witnesses to testify privately before the new...
Congrats on proving what a liar you are.
The Steele Dossier was used to get FISA warrants. Spin it however you want.
The Durham report says there is no foundation - not just an illegitimate Steele Dossier - to have an full investigation on 'Russian Collusion'.
The FBI continued the investigation, even though they knew there was no basis for an investigation.
They knew Hillary paid for the Steele Dossier and still used it.
You can spin it any way you want, but those are facts.
I realize you want to defend anyone who is out to get Trump, but the investigation was bogus and Durham exposed the FBI for their bias. And I guess you forgot about Peter Strzok's text to Lisa Page about having a plan to keep Trump from being President.
Anyone with half a brain could see the conspiracty to get Trump. "in plain sight" as Pencil Neck would say.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Durham was exposed for his bias. Yet he fully admitted there was Russian collusion but that it was merely inadvisable.
It is amazing how many facts you get wrong or purposely omit
Yeah, like Trump paid off the whistleblowers...... if you had any sense, you'd slink away, but you're too stupid to realize your idiocy.
Trump didn't write them a personal check so he had nothing to do with it.
But you don't think Joe profited off Hunter's business dealings because the money didn't go directly into Joe's account. Just his entire family's.
I don't think you want to go there.
You're making me look aren't you.
Of course....Kash f#$king Patel again.
Yeah this is totally not a farce and should be taken with the utmost seriousness.
Here's a tip, when going after political opponents it works better if you can get someone that's a political peer or a direct associate instead of constantly holding up well know sycophants.
That just gets you ridiculed.
Last edited:
Isn't the point that they got paid by those who are basing their ah ha on their testimony and credibility?
Nah it'll be fine.
Similar threads
