Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Habba is the female version of Hutz.
I loved the ad he did where he changed the punctuation to:Enjoy. They’re filled with useful legal tidbits is my favorite line ever
Quotes by Lionel Hutz: The Simpsons - quotational
Sharing your favorite quotes from TV, Movies, and More.quotational.com
I love when he went with homer to a settlement conf and all the lawyers are around the table and opposing counsel says I’m going to write down a settlement offer and folds a piece of paper and slides it across the table to hutz. Hutz opens it and goes to homer hmmmmm we better take this. And the number was 0. 🤣🤣I loved the ad he did where he changed the punctuation to:
Works on contingency?
No. Money Down!
Would she be responsible if it turns out Trump told her which strategy to follow, which legal points to make, which witnesses to call etc. etc.? Habba may not be a great lawyer but I doubt Trump gave her full latitude to decide how to run the case.We have a very good idea by reading her motions and response briefs; the transcript; her own evidentiary ignorance (which was astounding), and her overall legal acumen. Her line of questioning was baffling.
She was losing the case regardless, but she firmly established that she was well over her skis before the trial began. It only got worse. What astounds me is how in the world was she hired.
So that's why he hired her.Depends on how you measure "better".
She's 39 years old.You get nuttier by the day. I’ve never heard her speak, no nothing of her personality, and only seen her pics on the internet and still feel confident to say that she’s probably 40 and in the top 1 percent in that age group and up. I’m not into older women but I would meet her for happy hour and see if I could tolerate whatever her voice and personality are. Hopefully she has vocal fry. I like that
Well he certainly didn’t tell her to **** up her ability to get evidence in or object to evidence. Or to waive objections. Or to cross examine witnesses in such a barbaric manner with little to no point.Would she be responsible if it turns out Trump told her which strategy to follow, which legal points to make, which witnesses to call etc. etc.? Habba may not be a great lawyer but I doubt Trump gave her full latitude to decide how to run the case.
If Trump called the shots, I don't see how he could sue her for the bad outcome.
Trump wasn't going to prevail in that case even with a good trial lawyer, and he's not going to go after Habba. He's got bigger problems, with a verdict in the civil fraud case now pushed back to mid-February. The dollar amount there may make the E. Jean Carroll case look like small potatoes.Would she be responsible if it turns out Trump told her which strategy to follow, which legal points to make, which witnesses to call etc. etc.? Habba may not be a great lawyer but I doubt Trump gave her full latitude to decide how to run the case.
If Trump called the shots, I don't see how he could sue her for the bad outcome.
I want my lawyer to look like they have seen a bunch of late nights. She is billing you time for the gym.So that's why he hired her.
Very likely on items in the first two sentences. The third, I wouldn't necessarily say that Trump didn't have a hand in though.Well he certainly didn’t tell her to **** up her ability to get evidence in or object to evidence. Or to waive objections. Or to cross examine witnesses in such a barbaric manner with little to no point.
As to your point, if the lawyer disagrees With client on strategy, the lawyer has an obligation to advise the client as to ramifications or provide alternates.