Huh? The point is, the data the CDC is collecting is nowhere near accurate, due to cases not being reported.
For God's sake, use your head just once here.
COVID is over.
- Thread starter Aloha Hoosier
- Start date
For God's sake, use your head just once here.
Making stuff up again that was never said in that way. One might do you a lot of good though.
If infections just aren't being reported, then the data wouldn't be likely to show a difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated infection rates. It is an easy cop-out to just say the data are no good.
Oh my God, you are thick as a brick.
If you can't see that the CDC data is unreliable, well..... you just continue living in your fantasy world.
No one is forcing anyone to get a flu shot, either.
What's the death toll for the flu? Every year. Far more than Covid.
What's the USA death toll from flu? 5K some years. 10K some other years. Maybe even 50K in really, really bad years.
COVID-19? In the USA 1,055,246 (as of now) in 2.75 years. And that is a gross underestimation, based on excess death statistics.
So it's about 8x worse per year than the very worst of the flu years.
COVID-19? In the USA 1,055,246 (as of now) in 2.75 years. And that is a gross underestimation, based on excess death statistics.
So it's about 8x worse per year than the very worst of the flu years.
Last edited:
It’s a shame all those people had to die! Just so Pelosi and Schumer could get rid of Trump.
I like how you use the US numbers for the flu, but world numbers for Covid. Now, take the flu numbers worldwide since the flu has been around. Every heard of the 1918 flu pandemic?
Very disingenuous.
I thought you had me on ignore? lmao You've proved yourself to be a liar.
I'll give you credit, DANC. You are a tireless troll without even trying!
I'll give you credit - when you're wrong, you compound it by clinging to your false argument.
Actually, I think he may be my dad. But the results are not back yet. I'd be proud though, even if he's an Uncle.
That's what my half brother, BawlDancmer said.
Do you think that means that we are........... NAAHHHHHHH no way.
Let's see if the data gets peer reviewed and published. It looks VERY FISHY.
Supposedly....
Males over the age of 60 had a 10% increase. No error bars given.
Males 40-59 had a no increase. No error bars given.
Males 18-39 supposedly had an 84% increase. No error bars given.
You were not counted if you ever had covid or if you ever had a booster.
Look at those numbers and think about the magic supposedly happening at age 40. Look at how the group most unlikely to ever have cardiac events are the ones most affected.
This reeks of small sample size, with two vanishingly small risks being compared and one or a few random anomalies making all the difference. Plus the guy discussing it is an antivaxxer.
Wait for the data. Wait for peer review. Wait for statistical significance analysis.
84% plus or minus 85% would, of course, mean nothing.
Science is never done by political press release.
Supposedly....
Males over the age of 60 had a 10% increase. No error bars given.
Males 40-59 had a no increase. No error bars given.
Males 18-39 supposedly had an 84% increase. No error bars given.
You were not counted if you ever had covid or if you ever had a booster.
Look at those numbers and think about the magic supposedly happening at age 40. Look at how the group most unlikely to ever have cardiac events are the ones most affected.
This reeks of small sample size, with two vanishingly small risks being compared and one or a few random anomalies making all the difference. Plus the guy discussing it is an antivaxxer.
Wait for the data. Wait for peer review. Wait for statistical significance analysis.
84% plus or minus 85% would, of course, mean nothing.
Science is never done by political press release.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Lol. How dafuq have you gotten Covid 37 times? I had it once … I think. If I were you I’d say you had it 69 times.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Yea, probably good idea. Some days all this bullshit wears me out and pisses me off.
A critical review of Florida’s new vaccine analysis
Florida just announced the results of an analysis that they performed, claiming the results show “an increased risk of cardiac-related death among men 18-39” for the mRNA vaccines, and …
youcanknowthings.com
About vaccine effectiveness:
6abc.com
Avoiding infection is the key, and while COVID vaccines and boosters don't always prevent infection, numerous studies find it can reduce the risk of long COVID.
"Those who had two doses of vaccine before getting COVID had an approximately 75% lower chance of getting long COVID," said Ferrer. "While those who got three doses had an 84% lower chance of getting long COVID."
Coronavirus cases: Research sheds light on an emerging parallel COVID epidemic amid new variant, lingering symptoms | 6abc.com
Many people now view coronavirus cases like the common cold or flu. However, new on long COVID symptoms research suggests that's far from the truth.
I think part of that is because the politicians do it so a lot of people just imitate what they see. The other day I was talking to this lady (strong Democrat) and she was talking about visiting some relatives and how good of a time she had and how at peace she was there even if they are Republicans. That's the problem with this country now... a lot of people look at the other party as enemies. They aren't my enemies. I may disagree with them but I sure don't look at them as enemies. I'm sure we would disagree on a lot of things besides politics too.
Well Biden said if you got the vaccination you wouldn't get it in this video. Then later on in another speech he stated that you are at a very low risk of getting it if you're vaccinated which is also false. So I can see why some people think you won't get it. Their biggest mistake was listening to anything the politicians had to say.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
What the hell are schools supposed to do to stop the war in Gaza- Latest: Joe_Hoopsier
-