His foot was extended. It should've been called a foul.
The foul would be on the offensive player. That’s the point I was making. And, no, it’s still not a foul on the trip. The right non call prevailed.Certainly, it's called a charge.
I'm not going to argue with you if it was a foul, as I've said, I think it's subjective and some refs would call it and some would not. My argument with you is you were trying to say 1) it's not a foul because the defender has his foot planted and didn't move, 2) that Phin initiated the contact, and 3) that it was a "Fact" that it wasn't a foul.
And, here you go: go to 3:10 and play from there. Don't see how you can say he didn't trip him, but I know you will!