http://www.startribune.com/official-white-house-didn-t-want-to-tell-seniors-not-to-fly/568599532/
I’ve seen multiple cases of this, also including he was told to let the passengers off the cruise ship. Just in case COH wants to continue complimenting Trump on following the advice of his experts. Sorry for another virus thread.
Several points here.
First, stories based on anonymous sources and other persons not authorized to comment belong in the "Fauchi was muzzled" NYT fake news category.
Second, Trump is barraged with contradicting and conflicting recommendations about what to do with Coronavirus. Those who advocate for something and the policy ends up different don't enhance their credibility by anonymously running to their nearest friendly reporter.
Third, As a member of the affected group, I am perfectly satisfied with the information I have been given about flying. The message is clear and unambiguous. There is an increased risk of infection from ANY enclosed space, including flying, buses, subways etc. The risk is enhanced for seniors with certain identified underlying conditions. If I do chose to board an airplane, I have been given the information I need to minimize risk
Fourth, Trump has been very aggressive with travel bans. His first orders received criticism for overreacting. If he received a recommendation to ban seniors from flying or banning any travel, he'd likely follow it.
Fifth, some people in general, and . . .TRIGGER ALERT . . .younger female reporters in particular, want to be told what to do. The last press conference I watched was loaded with questions like "I have elderly parents, should I tell them not to travel?" The answer appropriately from the adults like Dr. Fauchi, Dr. Birx, and Secretary Azar was always the same; here are the people most at risk and here are the appropriate measures to mitigate risk. But make your own decisions.
Finally, there is no doubt conflict and disagreement exists within not only the response team, but from health professionals in general, about what actions to take and what message to deliver. You need to balance good information with not inducing panic and riots in the streets. In my view, the information has been too much on the alarmist side and not enough on those who are infected with mild symptoms. The media using Coronavirus as yet another way to bash Trump is sick and wrong. Focusing on the internal disagreements for news value is stupid. But I don't think the media is worth a damn these days anyway. The most important information for me comes from watching the public briefings of the response team, not from the reporting based on anonymous sources.