ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Cost The GOP The Senate in 2020 - and Will Again in 2022

MyTeamIsOnTheFloor

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Dec 5, 2001
54,586
36,643
113
Duckburg
Thanks.

Gave us the Biden Inflation Bill.

If he costs us the House in 2022 also - still a possibility - he will have "hard lined" us into the hands of socialism and worse.


Is Trump worth that?
Is he worth driving what y'all now call "RINO's" out the party and losing?
Or do you want to hold the House and block the socialist "what is a woman" crap?

Decide quick.
 
GOP leadership decided already, when they went 180 degrees in a matter of days, from condemnation of 45 on Jan 7, 2021 to gently caressing his butt cheeks the week after.

Blind allegiance is mandated.
Be not proud. The extreme left (you?) are just as pig-headed as the worst GOP extreme. Someone could tell them Trump has a tail and eats babies stolen from the poor and they'd believe it and tell others. (Have you seen the video of the Russian whores pissing on Trump in a Moscow hotel yet? Nope - but maybe 75,000,000 Democrats believe it happened! Many are college graduates - view themselves as intellectuals - and believe anything you tell them!)

If Trump cured cancer and inflation and unemployment and world peace reigned, they (you?) would be on the internet calling people "insert banned Trump adjective here" and encouraging children to hate their Trump-supporting parents and proudly excising Trump voters from their friend lists. (And calling other people cult members to boot!) These are people who thought W was "extreme"! Yet many in the GOP hated Bush 1 and Bush 2 for being MILQUETOAST - and the Dumbass D's believe they were "extreme" and fought 2 wars for oil profits! Mental disease.

There's about 100,000,000 extremist (50 on each end) who are controlling the debate right now, and all we get is extremist BS from both parties.


Anyway - Trump cost the GOP - all of them, hard right and moderate - control of the Senate and allowed the Biden Inflation Bill to pass. His refusal to call for PEACEFUL OPPOSITION ONLY is a death knell for the Senate elections. With the help of extremism on the left, he is solidifying support among folks willing to engage in street violence and worse. Folks who oppose that are called RINOS - even folks who are GOP since Lincoln.

I'm thinking about trying to register as Whig.

EDITED after request, er "fist inside the velvet glove" threats, from The Man
 
Last edited:
Be not proud. The extreme left (you?) are just as pig-headed as the worst GOP extreme. Someone could tell them Trump has a tail and eats babies stolen from the poor and they'd believe it and tell others. (Have you seen the video of the Russian whores pissing on Trump in a Moscow hotel yet? Nope - but maybe 75,000,000 Democrats believe it happened! Many are college graduates - view themselves as intellectuals - and believe anything you tell them!)

If Trump cured cancer and inflation and unemployment and world peace reigned, they (you?) would be on the internet calling people Trumptards and encouraging children to hate their Trump-supporting parents and proudly excising Trump voters from their friend lists. (And calling other people cult members to boot!) These are people who thought W was "extreme"! Yet many in the GOP hated Bush 1 and Bush 2 for being MILQUETOAST - and the Dumbass D's believe they were "extreme" and fought 2 wars for oil profits! Mental disease.

There's about 100,000,000 extremist (50 on each end) who are controlling the debate right now, and all we get is extremist BS from both parties.


Anyway - Trump cost the GOP - all of them, hard right and moderate - control of the Senate and allowed the Biden Inflation Bill to pass. His refusal to call for PEACEFUL OPPOSITION ONLY is a death knell for the Senate elections. With the help of extremism on the left, he is solidifying support among folks willing to engage in street violence and worse. Folks who oppose that are called RINOS - even folks who are GOP since Lincoln.

I'm thinking about trying to register as Whig.
I don't recall a recent Pew poll coming up here, but it is filled with excellent stuff. Here is one sample:

Slightly more than half of U.S. adults (55%) say the Democratic Party is too extreme in its positions, while a somewhat larger share (61%) say the same about the Republican Party.​
Here is another great quote:

Overall, about a quarter of adults (27%) say neither party governs honestly and ethically, while 30% say both parties are too extreme in their positions. Nearly as many (28%) say both too often make excuses for party members who have hateful views.​
Now that is only 27% (or 30%), which isn't an overwhelming number. But it is a good start. But that roughly 30% only wields power if it moves lock, stock, and barrel into the same party. Divided between the parties and independents means they have no power.

 
Is there a unifying political philosophy for the Trump wing of the Republican party? It seems to me--and I'm not well-read on this which is why I am asking so I'm admitting I could be wrong--that the one unifying thing is that they support Trump, don't think he should have been impeached or investigated, etc.

Is that just the media spin? Is there more than a support of Trump in all things? Do they have a common set of solutions to present-day problems or at least a way of analyzing those solutions/problems?

Note: If you are going to just respond with snark, please don't. It won't advance the conversation and will divert attention from those who might take a stab at answering it.
 
If half or even three-quarters of the bad stuff about Trump is made-up crap (pee tape, for example), the other half or one-quarter is still 10 times more than you need in order to decide that he is a scumbag.

Lindsay Graham, Ted Cruz, and others told you that in plain language in the 2016 primaries, before they joined the cult too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill4411
Is there a unifying political philosophy for the Trump wing of the Republican party? It seems to me--and I'm not well-read on this which is why I am asking so I'm admitting I could be wrong--that the one unifying thing is that they support Trump, don't think he should have been impeached or investigated, etc.

Is that just the media spin? Is there more than a support of Trump in all things? Do they have a common set of solutions to present-day problems or at least a way of analyzing those solutions/problems?

Note: If you are going to just respond with snark, please don't. It won't advance the conversation and will divert attention from those who might take a stab at answering it.
I'm repeating something I said in another thread, but I think the unifying philosophy is two-fold. There is a core of nativism. Trump tapped into this with his "build the wall" and so forth. But then, there is also a broader politics of grievance, which goes beyond just distrust of outsiders, and also includes a deep-seated belief that the ruling elites no longer care about the regular guy.

Obviously, this is a philosophy of circumstance more than it is one of policy, which can actually be powerful, because it allows a broad range of policies to be pulled under the umbrella.
 
Thanks.

Gave us the Biden Inflation Bill.

If he costs us the House in 2022 also - still a possibility - he will have "hard lined" us into the hands of socialism and worse.


Is Trump worth that?
Is he worth driving what y'all now call "RINO's" out the party and losing?
Or do you want to hold the House and block the socialist "what is a woman" crap?

Decide quick.
I agree with everything you've said, and have basically been saying more or less the same thing for the past 2 months. I'd go a step further and say the Senate is lost, and the House is teetering...I also think that even mentioning the "what is a woman" Matt Walsh mantra doesn't enhance the GOP argument beyond the culture warriors that are already on the bandwagon.

Besides his ridiculous movie, Walsh has made outlandish videos demanding that people not have sex if they don't want the responsibility of birthing a child. I know there is a constituency for that sort of neanderthal level of thinking, but it's not the same Independents who probably align more with Dems on Roe than any other single issue, except maybe gun safety.. I'd argue it repels voters, as opposed to trying to attract them...

I realize this is a political ad and some may not like the ad itself, but take a look at these interior numbers from the latest Fox poll. I think that some of our own board members who articulate the same far out positions that this ad rails about are unwitting examples of why these numbers have shifted so drastically from April.

To a very large degree the candidates emerging from GOP Primaries have been a disaster, for general election prospects. By contrast the Dems have nominated people who are more centrist, or in the case of a Fetterman someone who is basically just the appropriate level of "progressive" for a state like PA. When polls show incumbents like Rubio and Johnson trailing in Senate races approaching Labor Day in the middle of what for all intents and purposes was supposed to be a Red wave, it's pretty obvious that the GOP has done a massive job of stepping all over their own dicks in the past 6 months...

 
Is there a unifying political philosophy for the Trump wing of the Republican party? It seems to me--and I'm not well-read on this which is why I am asking so I'm admitting I could be wrong--that the one unifying thing is that they support Trump, don't think he should have been impeached or investigated, etc.

Is that just the media spin? Is there more than a support of Trump in all things? Do they have a common set of solutions to present-day problems or at least a way of analyzing those solutions/problems?

Note: If you are going to just respond with snark, please don't. It won't advance the conversation and will divert attention from those who might take a stab at answering it.
I absolutely think Trump's messaging resonated with a large group of Americans. I don't think Trump is the unifying thing, but rather that he voiced what so many felt. I watched a documentary, actually a couple, one involving people in appalachia who felt as though Trump was the first candidate in ages to "speak to them," and a separate documentary on Q people who started out Bernie Sanders fans but moved to trump. It's the marketing. It's the drain the swamp. Anti political establishment. Harkening back to what people perceive as easier days "when america was great" and we produced things instead of pushed papers and serviced. imagine how you would feel if you were part of a certain segment of society with little education and a long history of labor/manufacturing or were told to learn code. think how out of touch that sounds. bring jobs back. bring manufacturing back. don't be the cop for the world. question large organizations. don't take shit. blah blah blah. It's why when people say "the cult," it's not entirely accurate. the philosophy/beliefs were a sleeping giant. the ideological cult. it took a personality to make it flourish
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Is there a unifying political philosophy for the Trump wing of the Republican party? It seems to me--and I'm not well-read on this which is why I am asking so I'm admitting I could be wrong--that the one unifying thing is that they support Trump, don't think he should have been impeached or investigated, etc.

Is that just the media spin? Is there more than a support of Trump in all things? Do they have a common set of solutions to present-day problems or at least a way of analyzing those solutions/problems?

Note: If you are going to just respond with snark, please don't. It won't advance the conversation and will divert attention from those who might take a stab at answering it.

I think it goes back well before Trump, and that there is not any uniformly-agreed-upon definition of "the Trump wing"

And IMO no - there is no "unifying political philosophy" for any of the multiple interest groups in either party.

IMO, Trump voters are made up of (none of this is based on polling):

GOP Buckley conservatives
GOP Goldwater conservatives
GOP Reagan conservatives
GOP Nixon/Bush moderates (what the above would have called "Rockefeller Republicans")

Former Democrats - Evangelicals who quietly voted Democrat for decades and came out of the churches in the 80's solely over the abortion issue to vote GOP

Former Democrats - Blue collar Union families who loudly voted Democrat for decades, and first trickled, then stormed into the GOP. They were first quiet Reagan supporters due to the Carter recession which destroyed them financially, and then both Reagan "standing up to/defeating the USSR after Carter got shoved around by Iran," and then the Reagan economy - which gave the ones left on the seniority lists a return of big union contracts (Detroit and the Sun Belt industrial America would have sold their families to get the unions back into the factories after the economy started cooking again), including big health care provisions, but who were eventually driven in large open numbers into Trump's arms by the Clinton/Obama folks ignoring them and then eventually favoring the most radical abortion positions and most radical social justice positions ("abortion as birth control" and then "what is a woman?").

(PS - All of the above sets include people whose support for the GOP was hardened further recently because they objected to being called racist solely because (1) they were OK with enforcing immigration laws already on the books, and/or (2) (even though they were happy to work with minorities and school with minorities and live with minorities and play/drink beer with minorities), they rejected (or feel threatened by?) the idea that they were born on third base and are only where they are because of white privilege. They work hard too. They didn't own slaves. "Don't blame me for slavery." Etc. These people watched The Great Society programs fail, and don't appreciate being blamed as the reason - GOP or Dem.)

A vast minority, but people who DO NOT object to being called racist - who revel in it. People who believe "whites are superior to blacks." (Sadly, the Dems have lumped all Trump voters into this category as a way of avoiding the good-will debate over many other issues.)

A small but growing number of "black religious right" folks, who want "the black family" back and see the Dems as ignoring them too, taking their votes for granted.

A small but growing number of Hispanics and other minorities - still convinced that America is the place they can work hard and get ahead.

There are other splits and groups, but this is enough to make the snark waterfall begin.

And I won't try and break down the groups who make up the Dems. My views would not be appreciated here.
 
I absolutely think Trump's messaging resonated with a large group of Americans. I don't think Trump is the unifying thing, but rather that he voiced what so many felt. I watched a documentary, actually a couple, one involving people in appalachia who felt as though Trump was the first candidate in ages to "speak to them," and a separate documentary on Q people who started out Bernie Sanders fans but moved to trump. It's the marketing. It's the drain the swamp. Anti political establishment. Harkening back to what people perceive as easier days "when america was great" and we produced things instead of pushed papers and serviced. imagine how you would feel if you were part of a certain segment of society with little education and a long history of labor/manufacturing or were told to learn code. think how out of touch that sounds. bring jobs back. bring manufacturing back. don't be the cop for the world. question large organizations. don't take shit. blah blah blah. It's why when people say "the cult," it's not entirely accurate. the philosophy/beliefs were a sleeping giant. the ideological cult. it took a personality to make it flourish

Trump lost all credibility with respect to "draining the swamp" when he revoked the lobbying ban right before he left office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Trump lost all credibility with respect to "draining the swamp" when he revoked the lobbying ban right before he left office.
Credibility isn't the issue. His own life and profession belie reality. It's the rhetoric and perceptions that resonate with many Americans. And they aren't all racists, tho some are, and they aren't all hillybillies, tho some are, but they are all Americans who share beliefs
 
Credibility isn't the issue. His own life and profession belie reality. It's the rhetoric and perceptions that resonate with many Americans. And they aren't all racists, tho some are, and they aren't all hillybillies, tho some are, but they are all Americans who share beliefs

I understand that, but if and when Trump were to run again, and Trump would try to claim that he was going to drain the swamp, all any of his opponents would have to do is point to that.

I know a lot of Republicans that were super mad that he did that after it happened. People may have forgotten, but if they're reminded, it won't be looked apon well.
 
I understand that, but if and when Trump were to run again, and Trump would try to claim that he was going to drain the swamp, all any of his opponents would have to do is point to that.

I know a lot of Republicans that were super mad that he did that after it happened. People may have forgotten, but if they're reminded, it won't be looked apon well.
Despite what you read on here, i believe trump has lost an enormous number of supporters. they haven't abandoned what they believe in, if anything they dislike the other side more than ever, but they lost faith in trump with all of his bs
 
Despite what you read on here, i believe trump has lost an enormous number of supporters. they haven't abandoned what they believe in, if anything they dislike the other side more than ever, but they lost faith in trump with all of his bs
Perhaps, but they'll vote for him anyway unless the Democrats put up someone like Manchin.
 
Perhaps, but they'll vote for him anyway unless the Democrats put up someone like Manchin.

Perhaps, but they'll vote for him anyway unless the Democrats put up someone like Manchin.
i'll make a dire prediction. i think things are going to actually get worse after the next election. i think the dems are going to put up a progressive that will really piss off the right and i think the pubs will put up desantis and he'll be emboldened and piss off the left. i don't think things are going to get better.
 
I think it goes back well before Trump, and that there is not any uniformly-agreed-upon definition of "the Trump wing"

And IMO no - there is no "unifying political philosophy" for any of the multiple interest groups in either party.

IMO, Trump voters are made up of (none of this is based on polling):

GOP Buckley conservatives
GOP Goldwater conservatives
GOP Reagan conservatives
GOP Nixon/Bush moderates (what the above would have called "Rockefeller Republicans")

Former Democrats - Evangelicals who quietly voted Democrat for decades and came out of the churches in the 80's solely over the abortion issue to vote GOP

Former Democrats - Blue collar Union families who loudly voted Democrat for decades, and first trickled, then stormed into the GOP. They were first quiet Reagan supporters due to the Carter recession which destroyed them financially, and then both Reagan "standing up to/defeating the USSR after Carter got shoved around by Iran," and then the Reagan economy - which gave the ones left on the seniority lists a return of big union contracts (Detroit and the Sun Belt industrial America would have sold their families to get the unions back into the factories after the economy started cooking again), including big health care provisions, but who were eventually driven in large open numbers into Trump's arms by the Clinton/Obama folks ignoring them and then eventually favoring the most radical abortion positions and most radical social justice positions ("abortion as birth control" and then "what is a woman?").

(PS - All of the above sets include people whose support for the GOP was hardened further recently because they objected to being called racist solely because (1) they were OK with enforcing immigration laws already on the books, and/or (2) (even though they were happy to work with minorities and school with minorities and live with minorities and play/drink beer with minorities), they rejected (or feel threatened by?) the idea that they were born on third base and are only where they are because of white privilege. They work hard too. They didn't own slaves. "Don't blame me for slavery." Etc. These people watched The Great Society programs fail, and don't appreciate being blamed as the reason - GOP or Dem.)

A vast minority, but people who DO NOT object to being called racist - who revel in it. People who believe "whites are superior to blacks." (Sadly, the Dems have lumped all Trump voters into this category as a way of avoiding the good-will debate over many other issues.)

A small but growing number of "black religious right" folks, who want "the black family" back and see the Dems as ignoring them too, taking their votes for granted.

A small but growing number of Hispanics and other minorities - still convinced that America is the place they can work hard and get ahead.

There are other splits and groups, but this is enough to make the snark waterfall begin.

And I won't try and break down the groups who make up the Dems. My views would not be appreciated here.
Buckley was very opposed to the conspiratorial wing, then called John Birch. He worked hard to shut them out of the GOP. I am not sure many Trump supporters come from Buckley. I would think those are more Aloha.
 
Despite what you read on here, i believe trump has lost an enormous number of supporters. they haven't abandoned what they believe in, if anything they dislike the other side more than ever, but they lost faith in trump with all of his bs

Maybe you're right, maybe not, but I find it interesting that of the six members of the house who were running for re-election (10 in total but four decided not to run at all), two are moving forward with only one actually winning his election (David Valadao was the rep from California that voted to impeach that is moving on but his race moves the top two along with the top vote getter getting 42% and Valadao getting 25% of the vote).

I think you're downplaying the effect of Trump and his pull on the party. He's going to cost the Republicans the senate by backing candidates like Hershel Walker and Dr. Oz. Would Republicans be pushing those type of candidates had it not been for the Trump stamp of approval?
 
Maybe you're right, maybe not, but I find it interesting that of the six members of the house who were running for re-election (10 in total but four decided not to run at all), two are moving forward with only one actually winning his election (David Valadao was the rep from California that voted to impeach that is moving on but his race moves the top two along with the top vote getter getting 42% and Valadao getting 25% of the vote).

I think you're downplaying the effect of Trump and his pull on the party. He's going to cost the Republicans the senate by backing candidates like Hershel Walker and Dr. Oz. Would Republicans be pushing those type of candidates had it not been for the Trump stamp of approval?
I have no idea who would run. My neighborhood has multiple Cori Bush signs up. The most dangerous city in America and these people support a defund the police dolt. The dumbing down of America is in full display. Youngkin set out how to handle trump. What others do - who knows.
 
Thanks.

Gave us the Biden Inflation Bill.

If he costs us the House in 2022 also - still a possibility - he will have "hard lined" us into the hands of socialism and worse.


Is Trump worth that?
Is he worth driving what y'all now call "RINO's" out the party and losing?
Or do you want to hold the House and block the socialist "what is a woman" crap?

Decide quick.
The rhinos were not an asset. Republicans will pick up those seats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbmhoosier
I have no idea who would run. My neighborhood has multiple Cori Bush signs up. The most dangerous city in America and these people support a defund the police dolt. The dumbing down of America is in full display. Youngkin set out how to handle trump. What others do - who knows.

I'm totally with you that America is getting dumber and it's on full display. The advancement of the internet, especially apps like Twitter and tic toc, made passing along disinformation, on both sides, much much easier.
 
The rhinos were not an asset. Republicans will pick up those seats.
What is YOUR definition of “rhino”?

It seems to change every couple of elections.

I know older Republicans who might call Trump a RINO.
I know Trump supporters who call anybody not in 100% on Trump a RINO.
 
I absolutely think Trump's messaging resonated with a large group of Americans. I don't think Trump is the unifying thing, but rather that he voiced what so many felt. I watched a documentary, actually a couple, one involving people in appalachia who felt as though Trump was the first candidate in ages to "speak to them," and a separate documentary on Q people who started out Bernie Sanders fans but moved to trump. It's the marketing. It's the drain the swamp. Anti political establishment. Harkening back to what people perceive as easier days "when america was great" and we produced things instead of pushed papers and serviced. imagine how you would feel if you were part of a certain segment of society with little education and a long history of labor/manufacturing or were told to learn code. think how out of touch that sounds. bring jobs back. bring manufacturing back. don't be the cop for the world. question large organizations. don't take shit. blah blah blah. It's why when people say "the cult," it's not entirely accurate. the philosophy/beliefs were a sleeping giant. the ideological cult. it took a personality to make it flourish
So I think I have a pretty good handle on why Trump won and why people backed him. (I guess you can call it "grievance politics" like Goat did, but I think that term has a negative connotation and what is really meant is "imaginary" grievance or "unearned" grievance.) I think some of those complaints have merit.

What I'm wondering is, though: do these people who are running with his blessing--the Walkers, Ozes, and that Wyoming woman--do they agree with policy solutions such as bringing back manufacturing, tariffs, isolationist foreign policy to handle those issues?
 
So I think I have a pretty good handle on why Trump won and why people backed him. (I guess you can call it "grievance politics" like Goat did, but I think that term has a negative connotation and what is really meant is "imaginary" grievance or "unearned" grievance.) I think some of those complaints have merit.

What I'm wondering is, though: do these people who are running with his blessing--the Walkers, Ozes, and that Wyoming woman--do they agree with policy solutions such as bringing back manufacturing, tariffs, isolationist foreign policy to handle those issues?
I really don't know. Here it seems so much has devolved from that meaty stuff to social/culture wars
 
So I think I have a pretty good handle on why Trump won and why people backed him. (I guess you can call it "grievance politics" like Goat did, but I think that term has a negative connotation and what is really meant is "imaginary" grievance or "unearned" grievance.) I think some of those complaints have merit.

What I'm wondering is, though: do these people who are running with his blessing--the Walkers, Ozes, and that Wyoming woman--do they agree with policy solutions such as bringing back manufacturing, tariffs, isolationist foreign policy to handle those issues?

Herschel wants to bring the economy down!!!! (I understand he meant inflation, but still, this is the best Georgia could come up with?)

 
I understand that, but still, he's the best Republicans in Georgia could come up with?
I don't know. I probably wouldn't vote for him. Maybe he's the most electable because of name recognition?

I just am not a big fan of either side playing gotcha's with random mistakes in speech. Same applies to Biden, Trump, etc.
 
Thanks.

Gave us the Biden Inflation Bill.

If he costs us the House in 2022 also - still a possibility - he will have "hard lined" us into the hands of socialism and worse.


Is Trump worth that?
Is he worth driving what y'all now call "RINO's" out the party and losing?
Or do you want to hold the House and block the socialist "what is a woman" crap?

Decide quick.
The price of too much democracy.

We vote too damn much on too many candidates and too many issues.

If we had smoke-filled rooms we wouldn’t have to worry about Trump or whether men need Tampons.
 
Thanks.

Gave us the Biden Inflation Bill.

If he costs us the House in 2022 also - still a possibility - he will have "hard lined" us into the hands of socialism and worse.


Is Trump worth that?
Is he worth driving what y'all now call "RINO's" out the party and losing?
Or do you want to hold the House and block the socialist "what is a woman" crap?

Decide quick.
There is more wrong here than Trump. Congress has operated in cram-down mode since Obama perfected that technique. That is a bigger problem than Trump. If Trump died tonight, we would still have dysfunctional government on into the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dr.jb
So I think I have a pretty good handle on why Trump won and why people backed him. (I guess you can call it "grievance politics" like Goat did, but I think that term has a negative connotation and what is really meant is "imaginary" grievance or "unearned" grievance.) I think some of those complaints have merit.

What I'm wondering is, though: do these people who are running with his blessing--the Walkers, Ozes, and that Wyoming woman--do they agree with policy solutions such as bringing back manufacturing, tariffs, isolationist foreign policy to handle those issues?
“That Wyoming woman” appears to be a solid and substantial individual. You seem to let Trumps endorsement affect your judgement of her. That is a different danger Trump brings to politics. Anti-Trumpism is so strong it clouds judgment about other candidates.
 
“That Wyoming woman” appears to be a solid and substantial individual. You seem to let Trumps endorsement affect your judgement of her. That is a different danger Trump brings to politics. Anti-Trumpism is so strong it clouds judgment about other candidates.
How have I judged her? By not knowing her name? That's ignorance (and laziness not looking it up), not judgment.

I'm actually trying to gather facts about her position and others so that I don't do exactly what you've accused me of doing.
 
“That Wyoming woman” appears to be a solid and substantial individual. You seem to let Trumps endorsement affect your judgement of her. That is a different danger Trump brings to politics. Anti-Trumpism is so strong it clouds judgment about other candidates.
She's already been caught in a lie the day after she was elected (false statement about Liz's concession). Not exactly a great start.
 
How have I judged her? By not knowing her name? That's ignorance (and laziness not looking it up), not judgment.

I'm actually trying to gather facts about her position and others so that I don't do exactly what you've accused me of doing.
If I misconstrued your post I apologize. My point is that there is more to issues and candidates than a Trump endorsement or beating an anti-Trumper in a primary. The media and Democrats are attempting to define every GOP candidate in terms of the Trump litmus test. If you are doing otherwise, kudos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcmurtry66
Thanks.

Gave us the Biden Inflation Bill.

If he costs us the House in 2022 also - still a possibility - he will have "hard lined" us into the hands of socialism and worse.


Is Trump worth that?
Is he worth driving what y'all now call "RINO's" out the party and losing?
Or do you want to hold the House and block the socialist "what is a woman" crap?

Decide quick.
Republican politicians are getting stupider. Though they’ll never catch up with the Democrats, there’s abundant evidence it’s contagious.
 
I'm repeating something I said in another thread, but I think the unifying philosophy is two-fold. There is a core of nativism. Trump tapped into this with his "build the wall" and so forth. But then, there is also a broader politics of grievance, which goes beyond just distrust of outsiders, and also includes a deep-seated belief that the ruling elites no longer care about the regular guy.

I'd call it "authoritarian populism," this time from the right. (Not to be confused with anything resembling classic, establishment conservatism.) The next time it could come from the left. There's no real guiding philosophy. Hell, the official Republican platform for 2020 was "whatever Trump says."
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT