I'll worry about climate change when rich libs start selling their beachfront properties.Perhaps AOC got that one right …. Climate change is going drown the planet when, AOC?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll worry about climate change when rich libs start selling their beachfront properties.Perhaps AOC got that one right …. Climate change is going drown the planet when, AOC?
Does overnight count as time? If so, I did time too.Did time? Spill it.
That's such a clueless take. CNN did this in an attempt to knee-cap Trump. The "moderator" was spectacularly bad. This won't hurt Trump one iota. And everyone should now realize CNN does not want to "do straight news". They are clearly as partisan as ever.It was part of CNN's new business model. They don't want to dismiss/ignore Trump anymore. They want to do straight news. And they want to be the leaders for election coverage. So they did this nonsense.
Nope. Good? A couple of years ago I got addicted to NBA2K. Damn I was good. I would always get Magic and post him up. I love big guards who abuse people in the post. Whiny 12 year olds "wah, wah, wah that's a cheat code". Suck it kids.
No, it doesn't. It has one. Disingenuous much?CNN panel has a couple Trumpers on, one of which is making a full on ass of himself. (He's the black congressman who got some Speaker votes.)
Why let facts get in the way of the liberal narrative? They see and hear what they want to see and hear.How? He was paraphrasing her story.
He was a million times better than Van Jones. He did a great job while being ambushed by all the other "panelists".He was no worse than Van Jones
Ohhhh this one wants details badly. Overnight? Does that count?Does overnight count as time? If so, I did time too.
Black man off the plantation!
LOL. You think what he said was a paraphrase of "he raped me?" Good grief.How? He was paraphrasing her story.
He specifically said, Her story is that....... good grief. I mean it's right there, go back and listen again.LOL. You think what he said was a paraphrase of "he raped me?" Good grief.
However he framed it, he clearly wasn't summarizing her argument. He was offering his own twisted version.He specifically said, Her story is that....... good grief. I mean it's right there, go back and listen again.
"I didn't watch". But I"m going to write a novel, saying how wrong you are and showing everyone DANC is living rent-free in my head.No one on the Left consider CNN "leftist". Do you even know that Kaitlin Collins got her journalism start as a reporter for the Daily Caller, including being their WH correspondent during Trump's reign of terror. She's no raging "leftie", in fact I came upon a story discussing the Log Cabin Republicans exposing some homophobic tweets she sent when she was a student at Alabama (where she's from)...
Beyond that, you seem to have adopted the DANC tactic of resorting to a laugh emoji when you're confronted with facts that you can't really counter. I asked you a simple question, and basically wanted you to explain your (imho)ridiculous claim that Trump appearing on CNN in front of a pro-Trump crowd in New Hampshire somehow exemplified "courage". I presented facts to back up my opinion, and you pulled a DANC and chose to refuse to engage...
Feel free to dispute my facts and tell me what I got wrong about how the audience was filled with pro-Trump supporters. There were people who had served in his administration posing as "audience members". Several Trump advocacy groups in the area had sent out calls for their members to show up in force to support him and I'm not aware of a single person even asking him a confrontational question.
I didn't watch (just like I didn't watch the Pete and Bernie townhalls on Fox that I referenced) because I don't as a rule watch town halls,debates or even speeches. But I've seen clips, so feel free to point out which of my statements regarding the composition of the crowd were erroneous. In a way it's perfectly fine for a crowd at a GOP primary season event to be exclusively Republican, so I don't begrudge him that.
My issue was with your ridiculous assertion that (seemingly) just ecause it was hosted on CNN it represented some sort of Red Badge of Courage moment from Trump. Obviously you can't really defend your asssertion with any sort of facts, so you resort to the DANC emoji and insert the red herring of CNN somehow being a bastion of liberalism. Maybe we should call you DANC junior?
Added dramatic content as every good story teller does as part of a normal conversation.However he framed it, he clearly wasn't summarizing her argument. He was offering his own twisted version.
You really can't be serious.However he framed it, he clearly wasn't summarizing her argument. He was offering his own twisted version.
She actually left early. Already filed sexual charges on Pres Trump. It was all a set up from the get go.Any word on if they’ve been able to scrape Kaitlin Collins off the stage floor yet?
Listen to what Donalds said - he was on the oversight committee and heard SWORN testimony that Trump did authorize NG troops. It wasn't from someone spouting off on a TV show.Yeh, he lied. Go back and look at the testimony.
“To be crystal clear, there was no direct order from President Trump to put 10,000 troops ‘to be on the ready’ for January 6th, correct?” said an unnamed interviewer in the video clip, referring back to a February 2021 Fox News segment when Mr Miller had stated that Trump had ordered “as many as 10,000 National Guard troops … to be on the ready”.“That’s correct. There was no direct, there was no order from the President.”“We obviously had plans for activating more folks, but that was not anything more than contingency planning,” Mr Miller added, before conceding that there had been no “no official message traffic or anything of that nature”.Trump’s ex-defence secretary contradicts his own sworn Jan 6 testimony on Fox News
’I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,’ said former defence secretary Chris Miller in a video shared by the January 6 Committeewww.independent.co.uk
Trump DID say they would need 10,000 guardsmen, but never ordered anyone to deploy guardsmen.
Here we go..... "I was a tough guy...." Who gives a shit about something you claim you did when you were 10 years old? BFD.Absolute wimp. He pretends to be tough and uses his power (first as spoiled rich guy who started out with his father’s millions, and then the office of President) like all cowardly bullies do.
Haven’t you ever encountered bullies. I took on two in my youth (rough neighborhoods) and made them stop being bullies. Trump reminds me of those guys. Big talking wimps.
I think there is a name for that "first punch". I can't seem to suck it from my memory.... hmmm What could it be?Here we go..... "I was a tough guy...." Who gives a shit about something you claim you did when you were 10 years old? BFD.
You've bragged before about how you like to get the first punch in. Sounds pretty cowardly to me.
Miller was acting Defense Secretary, Miller was recorded by the committee. Miller said in that recording, no, it did not happen. He said that to the committee in a video recording you can go to the article I linked and fire up the audio and listen for yourself.Listen to what Donalds said - he was on the oversight committee and heard SWORN testimony that Trump did authorize NG troops. It wasn't from someone spouting off on a TV show.
He can't order the NG - that's up to local government officials.He specifically said Miller told the Committee that. It is not in the video of what Miller told the committee. So specificially, who told the committee that Trump authorized it? Miller was the Acting Secretary of Defense, so if Trump called him and told him to activate the guard, Miller committed perjury.
The alternative is that the president ordered the NG activated and no one did it. He doesn't need Pelosi's approval, he can activate and deploy the guard (and regular army) based on the Insurrection Act of 1807. If he ordered it to happen, it would have happened.
Rather he tried to suggest it to use for cover if things didn't work his way.
If he ordered it, it would have happened. Or I guess the US military is deep state? But is it deep state to NOT stop a rebellion against the guy fighting to kill the deep state?
Your argument is with Congressman Donald. He's the one who said it was authorized under sworn testimony. Not what someone said later.Miller was acting Defense Secretary, Miller was recorded by the committee. Miller said in that recording, no, it did not happen. He said that to the committee in a video recording you can go to the article I linked and fire up the audio and listen for yourself.
If he didn't ask Miller, who did he ask?
Hey Mods can we get a "jerk off" emoji? I'm sure it wouldn't be used very often, but there are times.Collins, a politcal lightweight at best, who started out working for Tucker at far right The Daily Caller, was totally not up to the task.
when Trump said his solution for inflation was "drill baby drill", Collins never followed up with how does that help home costs, rent, grocery costs, cost of used cars, nor did she mention that oil companies can drill more in the US anytime they want, nor did she mention that Trump negotiated the Saudis to produce 2 mil barrels less a day while pres.
when Trump's solution to the Ukraine was was "less killing", she never pressed him on how he would accomplish that.
when Trump criticised Biden for Afghanistan, she never mentioned that Trump had 4 yrs to get out and didn't, that his great skills as a negotiator resulted in Trump giving the Taliban literally everything they wanted and the US getting nothing in return, then left Biden holding the bag with an undoable time line on Trump's way out the door.
when Trump's solution to gun violence was stop mental illness, she didn't so much as ask him what his plan was to deal with mental illness.
etc etc etc all night. no push back on anything, other than some stammering.
she was a total joke, can't think on her feet, had no business in that role, and was totally incompetent for the role.
reasons for which it's likely that Trump demanded her as the "host" of this Trump rally, and why CNN agreed.
the last thing CNN wanted was Trumpers changing the channel, any more than the Fox brain trust did.
You refuse to concede when you’re wrong. You’re wrong.However he framed it, he clearly wasn't summarizing her argument. He was offering his own twisted version.
It must suck when they get called out for spewing dishonest BS with facts!You refuse to concede when you’re wrong. You’re wrong.
Biden doesn't lie. He has dementia and just doesn't remember the truth.
Get your bs straight
Nope. He said it in a book. Under oath vs. a quote in a book. I'll go with under oath. You libs spew lies left and right. No facts, just narratives. Flame away.Miller was acting Defense Secretary, Miller was recorded by the committee. Miller said in that recording, no, it did not happen. He said that to the committee in a video recording you can go to the article I linked and fire up the audio and listen for yourself.
If he didn't ask Miller, who did he ask?
I'm not wrong. What he said didn't at all resemble what she said. He can claim he was rephrasing her argument all he wants, he was clearly offering an alternative version incompatible with hers. Whatever his intent in doing so, it came off as creepy.You refuse to concede when you’re wrong. You’re wrong.
Your argument is with Congressman Donald. He's the one who said it was authorized under sworn testimony. Not what someone said later.
Both of you REFUSE to go to the link because you want to believe what you were told. This is audio from the committee, under oath. Your dreamy congressman lied.Nope. He said it in a book. Under oath vs. a quote in a book. I'll go with under oath. You libs spew lies left and right. No facts, just narratives. Flame away.
You really just don't get it and are all tied up on "standard" procedural crap.Both of you REFUSE to go to the link because you want to believe what you were told. This is audio from the committee, under oath. Your dreamy congressman lied.
All he's saying with clarity is that there was no order from the President. Well, no shit. He doesn't give the order. He authorizes.Both of you REFUSE to go to the link because you want to believe what you were told. This is audio from the committee, under oath. Your dreamy congressman lied.
They'd believe a bureaucrat, but not a Congressman who was on the Committee who heard sworn testimony that Trump authorized the NG.You really just don't get it and are all tied up on "standard" procedural crap.
More dishonest posting/ understanding BS from your side.
No it's not failing to undersand, it's dishonest promotion of the same crap that the left does. IT's nothing but obfuscation over procedural differences.All he's saying with clarity is that there was no order from the President. Well, no shit. He doesn't give the order. He authorizes.
Miller dances around the questions asked him, but when asked directly about an 'order', he responds clearly. And no one has claimed Trump gave an 'order'.
You're failing to understand how authorizations work.
NOT A congressmen, there were 5 that testified. BUT when you control the message you can get away with this BS. WE MUST STAND UP to stop the bullets that we are working towards flying.They'd believe a bureaucrat, but not a Congressman who was on the Committee who heard sworn testimony that Trump authorized the NG.
Total dishonesty.
They'd believe a bureaucrat, but not a Congressman who was on the Committee who heard sworn testimony that Trump authorized the NG.
Total dishonesty.
The poster is either lying to push his narrative or clueless. Neither is good.All he's saying with clarity is that there was no order from the President. Well, no shit. He doesn't give the order. He authorizes.
Miller dances around the questions asked him, but when asked directly about an 'order', he responds clearly. And no one has claimed Trump gave an 'order'.
You're failing to understand how authorizations work.