The Disinformation Governance Board--reason #914 to hate Leftists
- Thread starter mushroomgod_1
- Start date
If YOU decide what is “misinformation” people like me wind up in camps.
These are same people who spent a year crying about the threat to democrasy; yet the irony is completely lost on them
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Isn’t that non-responsive to something real that just happened that you and many dismissed as a conspiracy theory but turned out to be true?
Dude, you need to change your name to the "Happy Ostrich." Your head is buried in the sand...or, perhaps, somewhere else.
I don't think they will have any enforcement capabilities ... I think that would be shot down in the courts. In my opinion, the board will be just another misinformation source.... as bad as some of the ones they are flagging as a misinformation source.
That is the "new" approach to controls. They don't need enforcement capabilities. They've spent at least the last 4 years perfecting how to launder information smears and enforcement over to the private sector. They are neutering the constitution and that pesky damn Judicial branch as part of this coupe.
You talking about the Expanded SCOTUS? Where sex and race determines who holds which seat? Where partisanship is demanded instead of reviled?
You're wasting your time. He's the king of "Nothing to see here", soon followed by "So what if it is, what does it matter?".
Your quote proves my point.
Yes, I guess we will see. I will reserve judgment for after we have some meaningful info about this.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
The Biden laptop and the instant casting of that story as Russian Propaganda by mainstream media and Intel officials - eg the people that will call other such things Russian propaganda. I mean - the problem is blatantly obvious.
To be clear, I didn't dismiss Hunter's laptop as a conspiracy. I dismissed it as irrelevant.
That said, I understand your point, and it's valid, but what's the solution? DHS just ignores misinformation, and does nothing to counter it?
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Sounds like you and the other conservatives.
That was the gop strategy for 4 years under Trump. If used by a dem then it is just a what goes around, comes around.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
You didn’t dismiss as a conspiracy and that’s fine. But the Intel apparatus certainly did. Media kicked NYPost off of Twitter. Do you think DHS will get this right? I don’t. Our worst talent works for politically-appointed government.
They need to counter misinformation via cyber security measures and other ways. Deciding what posts come down is not a good approach unless they can trace something coming from a troll farm or the like.
Obviously, you're right. But no one is suggesting they want to decide which posts come down.
My only concern so far - and maybe this is partly why you're wary - is that I see no need for this. It looks like a completely unnecessary extra level of bureaucracy.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Yes - that only serves to further harm government trust and institutional trust. This administration is a train wreck. It’s very disappointing.
Whatabout your whatabout concerning the whatabouts whatabouting about the whatabouts?
Now that is a slippery slope if I've ever seen one. What do you think would happen if the Democrats expanded the number of justices. When Republicans got the upper hand they would expand it again and appoint their justices. Better leave well enough alone but I don't think many of them have enough sense to see that.
I'm in for a good laugh. When did Trump establish government overreach policies or organizations? This should be good...
The Biden laptop story just needed a delay, followed by "its been missing for months - there is no way to tell what was on it or what was added" - which is also a lie, but it sells when you control the message.
Here is the intellect we are dealing with, as Biden babbles though pressers he may not even remember and further demon-strates rapid-onset dementia:
Hillary never used private devices.
Well, she did, but it was safe. She used the system provided by the government. You can see ALL the e-mails.
Well, she used a private system, and lots of e-mails are missing, but it was safe.
Well, it got hacked but who cares - Colin Powell did it too, and Trump was peed on by Russian whores and says Hollywood gold diggers will let him touch their crotch..
Russian bots used Facebook to defeat Hillary and Trump colluded with them.
There were no election shenanigans - trust us, we always tell the truth.
Twitter needs to censor ideas.
When Musk buys Twitter, he will refuse to censor the proper bad ideas.
We need a "Misinformation Cabinet" - trust us. And shut up - you don't even know if or how wet ill abuse this power. We are always honest - trust us.
January 6 put democracy at risk.
All the other riots we fomented and defended did not.
Trust us.
If you don't think like us, and won't trust us, its because you are racist Nazi fascists who watch Fox News. I'm unfriending you and writing your employer.
Trust them.
Sounds exactly how I feel all the way back to the 60s with Jim and the IMF fighting against authoritarian governments. We need the IMF.
Put me down as a dystopian in respect to unbiased news sources disappearing and leaving us only with sources for those on the political left and right. Political sources which claim to represent the truth and refer to sources which don't share their ideology as being fake news.
A government agency deciding what is disinformation in the hands of either those on the left or right would only accentuate the existing problem.
A government agency deciding what is disinformation in the hands of either those on the left or right would only accentuate the existing problem.
Let me get this straight. You want the United states Government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security (which oversees our open borders) to "counter" statements that it considers misinformation....and you think it's a good idea? You see no inherent danger?
Last edited:
Best not for you to 'think out loud'. First of all, you don't think, and if you do, you should just keep whatever bizarre shit is in your head to yourself.
Yes you get it. This is setting up something that WILL be abused by everyone. It is bad news.
Looks to me like you've already made your judgement.
Typical Democrat... Phonier than a three dollar bill...
Everything..., and I do mean Everything..., they accuse the right of is actually who they really are...
Weaponize the IRS, the NSA, the FBI..., the overseas Intelligence Services..., And the Department of Homeland Security....; No Problem..., as long as it fits their partisan agenda...
Last edited:
Disappointing, but totally predicted by most conservatives even on this board.
You Trump haters didn't want to believe it, but "We told you so".
Hopefully you won't be as gullible next time.
The key concept of an AI Language parser is to flag content, even before it gets posted.
Just put it in the fact check hopper before it can be read.
If it never sees the light of day … it may sent back to sender for acceptable corrections.
I thought he said he did. Either he or Aloha said they did.
If you didn't vote for Trump, that says you couldn't see a difference between Biden and Trump and that's just as bad.
What if neither candidate represents your individual values and/or policy preferences?
Then you are implicitly accepting whatever you get.
I find it hard to believe that you can look at 2 candidates, add up the positives and negatives, and not come to some sort of objective conclusion.
I can understand casting a symbolic vote, but don't come on here complaining about what you ended up with.
And I don't recall you bashing this administration. Maybe you have, but I don't recall.
I don't have a problem with expressing an opinion about philosophical differences. But if you enabled an administration to get voted in, don't complain about it later. That's all I'm saying.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
My only question, did you two make that vote based on that being the best president, or as a protest vote?
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Similar threads
