Even China is keeping their equivocation to the most vague version possible.At least we're on record for trying. I don't think anyone beyond maybe some Russians will be confused on who is wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even China is keeping their equivocation to the most vague version possible.At least we're on record for trying. I don't think anyone beyond maybe some Russians will be confused on who is wrong.
Yea, you need an organized insurgency. I would have organized all men 16-60 into groups of 10. And I would organize acts of terror in Russia cities prior to today to be carried out henceforth.Not if your plan is an insurgency.
There is no point in pulling together any type of standing military force, it will just get rolled over. You fight delaying actions and give up ground. Have units lay low while the Russian heavy forces move past. They then hit the supply lines and melt into the citizenry. Cross the Dnieper, blow the bridges, and settle in for a long and drawn out conflict with NATO weapons pouring in from the West.
That is the only chance they have. They cannot win the field in the initial push. They have to make Russian mothers receive their dead sons for the next several years in protracted low intensity guerilla warfare. That is their only chance.
I would have preferred starting with serious sanctions against elites with the hopes of convincing Putin to change his path. I think we took the wrong approach. I do think this may lead to the downfall of Putin if it becomes bloody on the Russian side.At least we're on record for trying. I don't think anyone beyond maybe some Russians will be confused on who is wrong.
EDIT: And some really stupid Americans.
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter...Yea, you need an organized insurgency. I would have organized all men 16-60 into groups of 10. And I would organized acts of terror in Russia cities prior to today.
Then every man is a target. I don't need a bunch of targets, I need key people who will fight and a bunch of people who are willing to help hide them.Yea, you need an organized insurgency. I would have organized all men 16-60 into groups of 10. And I would organized acts of terror in Russia cities prior to today.
Off the top of my head, I've experienced racism twice in my life. Once in Ukraine and once in China. The unfortunate reality is that there are Nazis in the Ukrainian armed forces. Moreover, they did shut down Russian speaking radio stations and attempt to delete the Russian language from all spheres. It does not excuse Putin's actions, but these are facts.Putin declared his intention to "demilitarize" and "de-Nazify" Ukraine. I'm not sure what "de-Nazify" is code for. Is it a claim that the Ukrainian government are Fascists? Or is it that they are under the thumb of Europe? Or is it just a generic dig at anything seen as anti-Russian?
Edit: CNN also reporting explosions in Kharkiv. Looks like a full-scale attack. Reuters confirming sound of artillery near Kyiv.
If Russia actually invades one can imagine the horrors. Rape, death, torture, etc. The rules of war no longer apply. Only if Ukraine fights a total war resting on the support of the populace do they have a chance.One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter...
If the Russians go for Kyiv, does that change anybody’s stance on real NATO military action?BBC just added Odessa to the list of places hearing explosions.
Edit: Which CNN confirms.
I doubt it. No one in NATO has any desire to intervene militarily. But the desire for sanctions might ramp up enough to make Russia an economic pariah.If the Russians go for Kyiv, does that change anybody’s stance on real NATO military action?
Too late for sanctions. It must be done and it will be done, but it won't change anything.I doubt it. No one in NATO has any desire to intervene militarily. But the desire for sanctions might ramp up enough to make Russia an economic pariah.
No, it definitely won't. Ukraine will become a puppet state, or eventually, guerilla warfare will push the Russians out. In many years. But it's very unlikely that there will be any international force coming to their aid.Too late for sanctions. It must be done and it will be done, but it won't change anything.
Even China is keeping their equivocation to the most vague version possible.
No.If the Russians go for Kyiv, does that change anybody’s stance on real NATO military action?
I think the only caveat is we wait to see if it is a full-scale invasion. It certainly appears so. I really did not understand the strategy. Democrats (I mean the party elites) are too keen on diplomacy. You have to know your opponent and play tough on occasion. The time for tough sanctions was much earlier. I have been calling for sanctioning Russians elites on this forum for years. The United States is filled with dirty money and criminals from all over the FSU. Too many are bought off imo.No, it definitely won't. Ukraine will become a puppet state, or eventually, guerilla warfare will push the Russians out. In many years. But it's very unlikely that there will be any international force coming to their aid.
It’s going to get dicey. Agree on the idea of completely shunning Russia economically to whatever extent we can (though our soft power in that regard has diminished). However, China’s disposition will matter greatly. Very interested to see how they respondI doubt it. No one in NATO has any desire to intervene militarily. But the desire for sanctions might ramp up enough to make Russia an economic pariah.
Addendum: That's just as a response to the invasion. Things could change weeks or months down the road after an occupation.
I'm not sure why China is relevant here? My sense is sit wait on the sideline and let others cannibalize themselves.It’s going to get dicey. Agree on the idea of completely shunning Russia economically to whatever extent we can (though our soft power in that regard has diminished). However, China’s disposition will matter greatly. Very interested to see how they respond
Putin already owns Belarus. Georgia has probably already been worried for many years. Estonia still has NATO.How far will Putin push? Estonia? Georgia? Belarus?
Per The Guardian, Ukrainian Interior officials confirm Russian troops in Odessa and Mariupol.MSNBC had a guy on the coast at Odessa saying that he couldn’t confirm that, he wasn’t seeing any land invasion.
Just dropping this for everyone:Per The Guardian, Ukrainian Interior officials confirm Russian troops in Odessa and Mariupol.
NB: These reports are all from Ukrainian officials, not from journalists.
Ukraine for now. They already have a puppet in Belarus and Estonia would trigger Article 5. They gauge reaction and see how well the occupation and response to sanctions goes. They will also test NATO to see if any cracks in alliance form.How far will Putin push? Estonia? Georgia? Belarus?
Loss of the Baltics really bothered Russia, but Belarus and Ukraine are special. NATO in Estonia is like Soviet missiles in Cuba. NATO in Ukraine would be like Soviet missiles in Windsor, Ontario.Ukraine for now. They already have a puppet in Belsrus and Estonia would trigger Article 5. They gauge reaction and see how well the occupation and response to sanctions goes. They will also test NATO to see if any cracks in alliance form.
There is also a Russian base in TiraspolKyiv is on the Dnieper … blowing bridges on the Dnieper to stop the tanks means the war is over.
Marine landings in Odessa says to me that Putin is after more than two eastern provinces.
https://www.grida.no/resources/5337
![]()
Basic military strategy requires him to prioritize taking the entire coast. Even if he doesn't push all the way to Kyiv.Kyiv is on the Dnieper … blowing bridges on the Dnieper to stop the tanks means the war is over.
Marine landings in Odessa says to me that Putin is after more than two eastern provinces.
https://www.grida.no/resources/5337
![]()
Belarussians and Ukrainians are Slavic peoples. Estonians are not.Loss of the Baltics really bothered Russia, but Belarus and Ukraine are special. NATO in Estonia is like Soviet missiles in Cuba. NATO in Ukraine would be like Soviet missiles in Windsor, Ontario.
It for sure bugs them, but the Baltics are a high possibility to kick off WW3. Whole new level of risk compared to Ukraine.Loss of the Baltics really bothered Russia, but Belarus and Ukraine are special. NATO in Estonia is like Soviet missiles in Cuba. NATO in Ukraine would be like Soviet missiles in Windsor, Ontario.
True. I'm just saying I don't think he's willing to risk for the Baltics what he'd be willing to risk for Ukraine.It for sure bugs them, but the Baltics are a high possibility to kick off WW3. Whole new level of risk compared to Ukraine.
They aren't just Slavic. A thousand years ago, they were all the same people. The cultural and ethnic affinity between Russians, Belarussians, and Ukrainians is about as close as it can get.Belarussians and Ukrainians are Slavic peoples. Estonians are not.
Maybe not exactly Windsor, but London and Ottawa fit well.Loss of the Baltics really bothered Russia, but Belarus and Ukraine are special. NATO in Estonia is like Soviet missiles in Cuba. NATO in Ukraine would be like Soviet missiles in Windsor, Ontario.
BBC: Russia says it is not bombing civilian areas, but is executing "precision" strikes against military infrastructure, aviation, and weapons in Ukraine.