Nothing you said disagrees with my statement that NONE of NY's deaths have been in the 18-44 age range.
First one in L.A. County today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing you said disagrees with my statement that NONE of NY's deaths have been in the 18-44 age range.
Many people believe something is very fishy with this Wuhan Virus...........
I hope your sister is ok. The medical community could obviously use her.
Nothing you said disagrees with my statement that NONE of NY's deaths have been in the 18-44 age range. I'm sure there will be some, based on principles of statistics, but the large majority of people in that age range are not required to be hospitalized. To your point, many are asymptomatic or have such mild symptoms they wouldn't have thought to get tested.
That's why we were talking about the concept of needing to particularly protect those susceptible to corona vs. those less so.
I hope your sister gets better quickly and with no lingering effects. She's a courageous person . . . .They might not need to go to the hospital or are dying, but they are sick and will be home for a minimum or two weeks regardless.
My 35 year old sister, who is in perfect health and is a nurse, has had a 101 degree fever, has the dry cough and says her lungs feel like they are caving in, is waiting for her test results to come back after being tested on Monday for the virus. It will take 5-6 days she says to get the results back. If she's positive, she'll have to be in quarantine even after she feels better.
How many people did she come in contact before she was showing symptoms? She feels pretty strongly she got this at the hospital as she only worked, got off her shift, worked the coronavirus hotline and went home. Just because someone young abd arent showing symptoms early on doesn't mean they aren't carrying the virus.
Dr. Fauci has disappeared from the podium.
About my sister, thank you.
I guess I brought her up was because if she does have it, when did she get it and who did she get it from? Who did she pass it to if she does have it. That's what she is worried about and things she isn't sure about.
Los Angeles just had a teenager die today. Details are still coming out so not sure if other health issues, but the mayor of LA just kept saying that this virus will get you if you're young or old.
This does not discriminate on age.
Again, I don't disagree about the infect-ability of the virus. I'm simply pointing out that the severity among the younger population is drastically different (for the better) than among the older population.
Here is the official statement from L.A.
Shortly after Newsom spoke, the Los Angele County Department of Public Health issued a brief statement indicating the minor's death will require further evaluation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"Though early tests indicated a positive result for COVID-19, the case is complex and there may be an alternate explanation for this fatality," the county department said.
It is unclear how the person contracted Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus, Ferrer had said.
Coronavirus-related deaths in children remain relatively rare.
"In the mortality data that has been provided to us, there has been no child under 15 that has succumbed to the virus in Europe," Dr. Deborah Birx, White House coronavirus response coordinator, said during a White House briefing Monday. "There was the one 14-year-old in China. So we still see that there is less severity in children, and so that should be reassuring to the moms and dads out there."
Probably for doing this interview:
Fauci says he would never use the term ‘China virus’ as he reveals frustrations working with Trump White House
Dr Anthony Fauci, the US’s leading diseases expert, has rebuked Trump’s claims on coronavirus. Now, he has described what it’s like inside the coronavirus taskforce in detail
According to the immunologist, the Trump administration needed things to be repeated four times before action was taken. He said: “When you’re dealing with the White House, sometimes you have to say things 1,2,3,4 times, and then it happens. So I’m going to keep pushing.”
The leading doctor told the New York Times in an interview published on Saturday that he was performing a balancing act with the Trump administration. He said: “I had been walking a fine line; I’ve been telling the president things he doesn’t want to hear. I have publicly had to say something different with what he states”.
Famous last words? One push too far? We can start calling it the McMasters Conundrum. The One Page summary sheet may not be working anymore.
Yep just like he thought his best bet was to ignore the virus for two months and hope for the best. That didn’t work out too well, nor will opening everything too early at the cost of lives. And what does the last line mean? What do people find fishy about the COVID 19 Virus?The guy is walking a frigging tightrope, and frankly, is in a no-win situation. The Democrats will attack him if he opens it up too soon, or vice versa, will attack him if he shuts it down too long...It's a true no-win situation...
Trump knows his very best chance to win reelection, is to crank the economy up again and hope for the best.
Many people believe something is very fishy with this Wuhan Virus...........
Oh he made that just as symbolism for his evangelicals. A resurrection of the economy. Also said he wanted the churches full on Easter Sunday, which is particularly scary when several cases have been traced to starting in church communities.It can't be a "goal" to arbitrarily pick a day and say this is the date that I'd like to see the restrictions start to be lifted, without first knowing things like (1) who actually has the corona virus right now (2) all the ways it can be spread, (3) how long will the virus thrive in the air and on various types of surfaces and under a variety of other conditions, (4)
the incubation period, (5) how long it takes corona survivors to recover to the point that they are definitely no longer capable of spreading it and how to tell for sure that they are no longer infectious, (6) whether or not those who recover from it have permanent immunity (like measles) to prevent their catching it again, and probably a lot of other questions presently unanswered. We just don't have a track record with this virus to know exactly how to deal with it.
So, Trump's Easter comment is just an arbitrary date, not a true goal capable of being pursued ... unless of course you just abandon any idea of helping the populace get healthy again in order to point to the economy as a campaign platform. #MAHA.
Just read of a 27 year old that died in NYC.I hope your sister is ok. The medical community could obviously use her.
Nothing you said disagrees with my statement that NONE of NY's deaths have been in the 18-44 age range. I'm sure there will be some, based on principles of statistics, but the large majority of people in that age range are not required to be hospitalized. To your point, many are asymptomatic or have such mild symptoms they wouldn't have thought to get tested.
That's why we were talking about the concept of needing to particularly protect those susceptible to corona vs. those less so.
https://thecity.nyc/2020/03/one-in-four-nyc-hospital-virus-patients-is-under-age-50.htmlI hope your sister is ok. The medical community could obviously use her.
Nothing you said disagrees with my statement that NONE of NY's deaths have been in the 18-44 age range. I'm sure there will be some, based on principles of statistics, but the large majority of people in that age range are not required to be hospitalized. To your point, many are asymptomatic or have such mild symptoms they wouldn't have thought to get tested.
That's why we were talking about the concept of needing to particularly protect those susceptible to corona vs. those less so.
The herd immunity strategy has had a thinning the herd effect. Seems to me that POTUS' use of Easter as the timing for "opening up the economy" is designed to appeal to his base with evangelical Christians . . .
. . . here in Georgia the densest clusters of corona virus outbreaks are in rural counties and centered around church worship services. He might lose a good part of his base, either directly to corona virus or to a dislike of the results, with this strategy . . . .
Yep just like he thought his best bet was to ignore the virus for two months and hope for the best. That didn’t work out too well, nor will opening everything too early at the cost of lives. And what does the last line mean? What do people find fishy about the COVID 19 Virus?
1) How many is many? 10? 11? 12?Many people believe something is very fishy with this Wuhan Virus...........
No need to get personal!1) How many is many? 10? 11? 12?
2) Whatis the fishy part?
3) Wuhan virus? Are you trying out-do Trump? Shouldn't you be talking about this New York virus or Seattle virus? Oh, yeah, how about Kentucky virus?
I think you hit the nail on the head. He's primarily concerned with his re-election prospects. That's what takes up most of his mindshare.The guy is walking a frigging tightrope, and frankly, is in a no-win situation. The Democrats will attack him if he opens it up too soon, or vice versa, will attack him if he shuts it down too long...It's a true no-win situation...
Trump knows his very best chance to win reelection, is to crank the economy up again and hope for the best.
Many people believe something is very fishy with this Wuhan Virus...........
I think you hit the nail on the head. He's primarily concerned with his re-election prospects. That's what takes up most of his mindshare.
And do you really think people would be critical of a decision to keep precautionary measures in place? The only people who would criticize his administration for that are the tin foil hat wearing folks who think this outbreak is some sort of 'conspiracy.
Again, I don't disagree about the infect-ability of the virus. I'm simply pointing out that the severity among the younger population is drastically different (for the better) than among the older population.
Here is the official statement from L.A.
Shortly after Newsom spoke, the Los Angele County Department of Public Health issued a brief statement indicating the minor's death will require further evaluation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"Though early tests indicated a positive result for COVID-19, the case is complex and there may be an alternate explanation for this fatality," the county department said.
It is unclear how the person contracted Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus, Ferrer had said.
Coronavirus-related deaths in children remain relatively rare.
"In the mortality data that has been provided to us, there has been no child under 15 that has succumbed to the virus in Europe," Dr. Deborah Birx, White House coronavirus response coordinator, said during a White House briefing Monday. "There was the one 14-year-old in China. So we still see that there is less severity in children, and so that should be reassuring to the moms and dads out there."
Across the United States, about 38% of coronavirus patients sick enough to be hospitalized were ages 20 to 54, the CDC reported last week.
The Coronavirus Is Sending Lots Of Younger People To The Hospital
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/coronavirus-young-age-severe-cases
I’m not sure how many are actually taking Trump seriously at this point. I mean, the daily press conferences are basically a joke to see if those on the stage who are experts can get thru them without displaying over the top “Trump is insane” body language. He can’t golf, he can’t go to rallies, he can’t tweet his way out of this and it’s killing him.
It can't be a "goal" to arbitrarily pick a day and say this is the date that I'd like to see the restrictions start to be lifted, without first knowing things like (1) who actually has the corona virus right now (2) all the ways it can be spread, (3) how long will the virus thrive in the air and on various types of surfaces and under a variety of other conditions, (4)
the incubation period, (5) how long it takes corona survivors to recover to the point that they are definitely no longer capable of spreading it and how to tell for sure that they are no longer infectious, (6) whether or not those who recover from it have permanent immunity (like measles) to prevent their catching it again, and probably a lot of other questions presently unanswered. We just don't have a track record with this virus to know exactly how to deal with it.
So, Trump's Easter comment is just an arbitrary date, not a true goal capable of being pursued ... unless of course you just abandon any idea of helping the populace get healthy again in order to point to the economy as a campaign platform. #MAHA.
I think you are being too literal. It is aspirational. If you don't get people back to work and the economic engine moving - the economy can collapse and a depression follows. Which has it'w own misery.
I am all for caution so lets see how it goes. I have a father with lung issues so I am not eager to get him exposed. But at some point we'll need to pivot and get back to work - for the people not in the higher risk groups.
I don't have a link unfortunately but last week I read that 100mil americans had at least one complicating condition, including age.Listened to a recent NYT Daily podcast that discussed the idea of segregating the higher risk groups. Those groups include: over 60, obese diabetics, people with high blood pressure, cancer patients and survivors, etc. Its not a small piece of the population.
what's more is that we are such a massive country geographically that maybe it makes sense to handle "opening business" on a regional basis. obviously new york is under siege but there many states where the entire confirmed cases is less than a hundred. maybe some places go back to business and usual and others don't. we have a country where we essentially turn the faucet on and off regionally.I think you are being too literal. It is aspirational. If you don't get people back to work and the economic engine moving - the economy can collapse and a depression follows. Which has it'w own misery.
I am all for caution so lets see how it goes. I have a father with lung issues so I am not eager to get him exposed. But at some point we'll need to pivot and get back to work - for the people not in the higher risk groups.
Listened to a recent NYT Daily podcast that discussed the idea of segregating the higher risk groups. Those groups include: over 60, obese diabetics, people with high blood pressure, cancer patients and survivors, etc. Its not a small piece of the population.
Listened to a recent NYT Daily podcast that discussed the idea of segregating the higher risk groups. Those groups include: over 60, obese diabetics, people with high blood pressure, cancer patients and survivors, etc. Its not a small piece of the population.
Listened to a recent NYT Daily podcast that discussed the idea of segregating the higher risk groups. Those groups include: over 60, obese diabetics, people with high blood pressure, cancer patients and survivors, etc. Its not a small piece of the population.
what's more is that we are such a massive country geographically that maybe it makes sense to handle "opening business" on a regional basis. obviously new york is under siege but there many states where the entire confirmed cases is less than a hundred. maybe some places go back to business and usual and others don't. we have a country where we essentially turn the faucet on and off regionally.
Right. So maybe it is plausible to open up regions for business by Easter. This isn't a one-size-fits-all approach. I listened to cuomo this morning and really like what he had to say about "rolling deployment." it makes little sense to attack this nationally. instead, we should concentrate our resources on the hotspots and go from hotspot to hotspot.Not looking at the country as a one-size-fits-all is obviously the way to deal with mitigation measures. Significant disease clusters are easily identified when looking at the Hopkins bubble map. One obvious correlation is that COVID-19 is heavily clustered around metropolitan areas with airports having significant international flights. In Colorado there is a cluster centered in Denver and along I70 to the ski areas. Continuing along I70 past the ski areas to Grand Junction, you find cases in the low single digits.
Like most current events, those that affect the east or west coast seem to be more important than what happens in the rest of the country. After accounting for a few obvious exceptions, COVID-19 is much less in fly-over country.
Not looking at the country as a one-size-fits-all is obviously the way to deal with mitigation measures. Significant disease clusters are easily identified when looking at the Hopkins bubble map. One obvious correlation is that COVID-19 is heavily clustered around metropolitan areas with airports having significant international flights. In Colorado there is a cluster centered in Denver and along I70 to the ski areas. Continuing along I70 past the ski areas to Grand Junction, you find cases in the low single digits.
Like most current events, those that affect the east or west coast seem to be more important than what happens in the rest of the country. After accounting for a few obvious exceptions, COVID-19 is much less in fly-over country.