Ok, there is going to be a legal battle just like Penn State (Sandusky crimes). NCAA punishments were struck down for not having the jurisdiction in their bylaws for the behavior they were punishing, and they had to pay for how and what they rendered. Just like UNC after 5 years leaning, when time for court, they have to step down, no case to defend thethe punishments they rendered. That's how the NCAA renders punishment, and also how they are thrown out.
They now have to show Kansas "embraced" "encouraged" and were not victims of fraud, which would make them in violation by their bylaws. NCAA has already stated their case Will be that it fits as a "booster" relationship, that is opposite of the courts findings in the Fed case. If the courts verdict stands and they are ruled as a 3rd party who defrauded the University, the court can and has struck down penalties that do not meet the bylaws as an infraction, and being the unknowing victim of fraud does not meet that bylaw on boosters and recruiting.
The FED case is a problem, for what should be a textbook easy enforcement of a violation.