Considering going to South Bend for the official announcement next weekend.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hopefully you’ll have that same understanding of shades of gray when the full Mueller report comes out?The Central Park five were not “exonerated” by DNA evidence, for one thing. They were actually found to have most likely participated in the rape by the Armstrong commission.
You mentioned cages in another post and was saying how Trump put children there. What exactly are you referring to? Are you talking about the separation of families because they come to the border and apply for asylum? I just wanted some clarification. Also are you aware of the Flores Agreement? This did not happen during the Trump administration. It goes back to Bill Clinton. Here is an article on it.No way this happened.
Hee appears to be cool, very cool.I like him more everytime I hear him or read about him. He's moving up on my list.
We’ve had this discussion multiple times. I’m just assuming you’re either too old or too stubborn to take in any new information. Don’t think it’s age, so...You mentioned cages in another post and was saying how Trump put children there. What exactly are you referring to? Are you talking about the separation of families because they come to the border and apply for asylum? I just wanted some clarification. Also are you aware of the Flores Agreement? This did not happen during the Trump administration. It goes back to Bill Clinton. Here is an article on it.No way this happened.
http://www.ncsl.org/blog/2018/10/30...flores-settlement-agreement-what-to-know.aspx
I don't know about that. They said America wasn't ready for a black President in 2008 also. We're progressing.Hee appears to be cool, very cool.
However, he is not ready to be the president of the USA. The USA is not ready, and won't be ready for a long time for a gay president. Trump and other holier-than-thou's will totally destroy him and the gays for that matter.
That one shocked me too. Even Indi-fracking-ana voted for him. Pete just could pull it off.I don't know about that. They said America wasn't ready for a black President in 2008 also. We're progressing.
https://supportkind.org/resources/t...ades-old-protections-for-vulnerable-children/You mentioned cages in another post and was saying how Trump put children there. What exactly are you referring to? Are you talking about the separation of families because they come to the border and apply for asylum? I just wanted some clarification. Also are you aware of the Flores Agreement? This did not happen during the Trump administration. It goes back to Bill Clinton. Here is an article on it.
http://www.ncsl.org/blog/2018/10/30...flores-settlement-agreement-what-to-know.aspx
I'm sure VPM and others will get right on that and meaningfully absorb this and any other information you can provide.
It’s the teacher in me. I find it hard to give up on anyone, even though I know I should.I'm sure VPM and others will get right on that and meaningfully absorb this and any other information you can provide.
So Goat. Let me ask you and please give a real answer. Would it bother you if Mayor Pete was a marxist?
Van, tell me what a modern day Marxist believes, and I'll see if I agree before labelling Mayor Pete.
If the response is along the lines of all progressive Democrats are socialists/ Marxists then I won't agree.
Van, you bounce around from point to random point, and avoid having to deal with any actual response to any of your points. I'm not giving you an answer, not only because the question was stupid, but also because I know from experience that you don't care about the answer.Hmm, no answer.
He's not a Marxist but he checks most, if not all, of the boxes that send tingles up the legs of the dupes. Whether it's the Green New Deal, reparations, single-payer healthcare and all of the other non-centristy menu items, he falls right in line, saluting the Bernie statue.
He's come up with "democratic capitalism", which seems to come down to one or the other but not necessarily both, so that if capitalism comes "in conflict" with democracy then capitalism has to capitulate, whatever the hell that means.
He's just another Jacobin.
McCain was a man of integrity. Trump is just the opposite. That is the reason why I said what I said.That one shocked me too. Even Indi-fracking-ana voted for him. Pete just could pull it off.
But times were different in 2008. The racial stuff was there, but it wasn't in-your-face. Even McCain publicly corrected a supporter claiming BHO was a Mooslim. I'm thinking things could get really ugly if Pete got the nod.
What is a Marxist? Is it just a dirty catchy word or is there a meaning to it?So Goat. Let me ask you and please give a real answer. Would it bother you if Mayor Pete was a marxist?
Someone started a rumor that his dad was a Marxist. Let's be clear on that.What is a Marxist? Is it just a dirty catchy word or is there a meaning to it?
The only Marxist I know of is Vladimir Putin and his followers. You know the guy who used to be the head of the KGB.
So, you tolerate Trump, who is rumored to be in Putin's pocket because Putin might have done something to get Trump elected. Yet, you cannot tolerate Mayor Pete because somebody started a rumor that he is a Marxist. Is that it?
Yup. I know I replied to it and so did Marvin. May have been others. Then Poof! it was gone along with the replies. And neither reply was nasty.Oh, good lord, is that was brought this all up?
Yeah, like he would have been able to follow that kind of discussion...Haven't we already had a big long discussion about the difference between Marxist political thought and Marxist criticism in academia?
And now more posts are missing? I can't even read the conversation, anymore. @Cajun54 can you give us some insight into who did what wrong? I don't recall seeing any posts that were even the least bit inappropriate, on either side. Just people disagreeing with things and talking about them. And now we can't even talk about those things, because half the conversation disappears.Yup. I know I replied to it and so did Marvin. May have been others. Then Poof! it was gone along with the replies. And neither reply was nasty.
Yeah, like he would have been able to follow that kind of discussion...
"Castigate" is a little overboard. Mike Pence has indeed had things to say about Mayor Pete's lifestyle! He has said he believes being gay is a choice, and that keeping gays from marrying was not discrimination but an enforcement of “God’s idea.” Pence believes Mayor Pete is living in sin and contributing to the collapse of society. Given what Mayor Pete has expressed about coming to terms with his own sexuality, and how his marriage makes him a better person and closer to his creator, I don't blame him for articulating his strong disagreement with Pence's views.It is very disappointing to see Buttigieg go out there and castigate Mike Pence, because he feels like that is what is expected of him.
He has said previously that in meeting Mike Pence, Pence was nothing but cordial and professional.
As I've said ad nauseam, Pence has obviously met many gay people in his life, and has never once had a thing to say about Buttigieg or his lifestyle.
The idea that he goes home every night and fumes over "they gays" is leftist horsesh*t.
Here’s another for Van. But Trump again today blamed it on President Obama, so we know Van will choose to believe him instead of the actual evidence. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/09/7114...ma-administration-had-child-separation-policyYou mentioned cages in another post and was saying how Trump put children there. What exactly are you referring to? Are you talking about the separation of families because they come to the border and apply for asylum? I just wanted some clarification. Also are you aware of the Flores Agreement? This did not happen during the Trump administration. It goes back to Bill Clinton. Here is an article on it.
http://www.ncsl.org/blog/2018/10/30...flores-settlement-agreement-what-to-know.aspx
You can't believe what that Kommie NPR says. Fake news.Here’s another for Van. But Trump again today blamed it on President Obama, so we know Van will choose to believe him instead of the actual evidence. https://www.npr.org/2019/04/09/7114...ma-administration-had-child-separation-policy
so that if capitalism comes "in conflict" with democracy then capitalism has to capitulate, whatever the hell that means.
Dare we say it's been bought by "Money'd Interests"and yet what's going on, is the exact reverse.
democracy has been bought off and captured by capitalism.
sorry if you don't know what that means.
not exactly rocket science.
He probably said something about sock puppets, but I can only guess.Dare we say it's been bought by "Money'd Interests"
Dare we say it's been bought by "Money'd Interests"
I don't know which is stranger, the haiku posting style or the single note content.He probably said something about sock puppets, but I can only guess.
I think he’s drunk as a skunk or higher than a kite all the time. I stopped reading his stuff long ago because it’s not worth a headache. I’m still waiting for him to explain why he posts the way he does, but until he does I’ll just assume he’s chemically impaired.I don't which is stranger, the haiku posting style or the single note content.
It makes me think of the mummy in the DirecTv add.
"A storm of sand. Do you think you're dealing with a one trick pony here?"
Why yes, yes i do.
I think he’s drunk as a skunk or higher than a kite all the time. I stopped reading his stuff long ago because it’s not worth a headache. I’m still waiting for him to explain why he posts the way he does, but until he does I’ll just assume he’s chemically impaired.
What?could we ever credibly say govt hasn't been bought.
if you allow them to buy it, which we have, 100% chance they will buy it, which they have.
i assume you and Aloha agree with me. (one would pretty much have to be brain dead to not notice our govt being bought).
if not, either or both of you would make a case against, which you absolutely never do. (for the obvious reason you have no case against).
you just don't like that i said it. thus the constant "shoot the messenger" thing, as some pathetic change the subject attempt.
come back when either of you think you can actually take me on on this.
i won't hold my breath, but will expect nothing other than the usual personal attacks as your way of backhandedly conceding the issue, for total lack of any actual rebuttal ammo.
next time just concede the issue, and look a lot less pathetic.
His academic achievements, his experience, his duty as a Naval officer, etc. are relevant in context of the claim made here that he's "just another loon."don't care where he went to school, his sexuality, his religion, his age.
what are his stances on key issues.
money in govt,
healthcare, MFA
jobs, wages, minimum wage,
immigration,
tax policy,
trade policy,
the military,
Israel-Palestinians
abortion,
open internet/title II designation,
monopolies, monopsonies,
His academic achievements, his experience, his duty as a Naval officer, etc. are relevant in context of the claim made here that he's "just another loon."
They must have changed his meds or dosage. He appears to be shitting on multiple threads with the same argument. The upside is he can copy and paste the same argument. So at least he's efficient.What?
Van, you bounce around from point to random point, and avoid having to deal with any actual response to any of your points. I'm not giving you an answer, not only because the question was stupid, but also because I know from experience that you don't care about the answer.
I use the ignore function very sparingly, but if this keeps up...They must have changed his meds or dosage. He appears to be shitting on multiple threads with the same argument. The upside is he can copy and paste the same argument. So at least he's efficient.
That you couldn't care less about those things makes me care even less about your views on the topic at hand. That said, regarding Mayor Pete's stances on policy, Google is your friend.couldn't care less.
what are his stances on the issues i listed above?
could we ever credibly say govt hasn't been bought.
if you allow them to buy it, which we have, 100% chance they will buy it, which they have.
i assume you and Aloha agree with me. (one would pretty much have to be brain dead to not notice our govt being bought).
if not, either or both of you would make a case against, which you absolutely never do. (for the obvious reason you have no case against).
you just don't like that i said it. thus the constant "shoot the messenger" thing, as some pathetic change the subject attempt.
come back when either of you think you can actually take me on on this.
i won't hold my breath, but will expect nothing other than the usual personal attacks as your way of backhandedly conceding the issue, for total lack of any actual rebuttal ammo.
next time just concede the issue, and look a lot less pathetic.