Extremely dangerous.While she and the Dems are figuring that out they will do damage to the country that could years to reverse.
She and Walz are very dangerous.
Meanwhile on Fox this morning...
Extremely dangerous.While she and the Dems are figuring that out they will do damage to the country that could years to reverse.
She and Walz are very dangerous.
I guest you think Project 2025 is not dangerous.
I still don't know what that is. Got a link with the text?I guest you think Project 2025 is not dangerous.
Re EMTALA, I thought that was Obama's best argument for his desire to change the system: that path is way too expensive. We need to get people into preventative care, to save on overall health costs.Would you consider EMTALA as already guaranteeing a level of healthcare to every citizen (in fact, it's not even limited to citizens -- or even immigration legal status)? For all intents and purposes, it's generally used this way.
I don't think single-payer healthcare is a good idea. And this is evident by looking at the systems that have been in place for sufficient amount of time to evaluate. They haven't cracked the code, they've just chosen a different poison.
But, as I said above, I have always been intrigued by Singapore's system (Medisave) -- which is basically:
1) people of working age have MSAs (which do have some subsidy for low-income) which they use to pay the vast majority of their healthcare transactions.
2) Payroll deductions of 8.5-10% of earning fund the savings account.
3) The catastrophic insurance is single-payer, for expenses beyond the MSA.
4) People are incentivized to use as little of their MSA as possible to meet their healthcare needs -- but still have the funds and insurance in place to meet those needs.
I said it all. Who likes it adds nothing to or changes nothing about what I said.UncleMark liking your comment says it all. If Hickory was around he’d love it to. TMP loving it too.
You wouldn’t understand it if you read it. A TTT would need to tell you what they think it meant which likely would be wrong as usual.I still don't know what that is. Got a link with the text?
I guess you think the Communist Manifesto is not dangerous.I guest you think Project 2025 is not dangerous.