What would these geniuses have done if Gore had disputed the results of the 2000 election? Heads would’ve…..You are a moron.
I’ve changed my mind.
- Thread starter snarlcakes
- Start date
That’s Joehoopsier. You’ll pick up his language in time. He’s like our own David foster Wallace the day after a bender
He did dispute the results. Recounts were done - publicly. Ballots examined - publicly.
The SC heard the case.
You are not a serious poster.
Listen junior, when you have game like mine, ain't nobody got time for that spell checks crap. I play down hill, all the time. Get north to south, score the scalps and mount the knee caps on a board, before I get bored.
The counts weren’t “public”. They were certified just like they always are. In this case, genius, the SCOTUS wasn’t even needed. It didn’t make it beyond the initial court cases. You know why? Because there’s nothing there. The cases were dismissed. All of them. There’s ZERO evidence. In spite of whatever stupid $hit you’ve seen on YouTube or dip$hit articles claiming otherwise. Again, you really think Bill Barr wouldn’t have pursued any evidence of tampering or fraud or whatever?
Not a serious poster. I’m serious about this. You guys are either just really dumb or brainwashed. I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and say the latter. Watch some factual news. Realize that were there ANY truth to what you’re saying, Fox wouldn’t be out $788 million. There’s no truth to it. To any of it.
Get some help.
Last edited:
Gore protested the results and the SC heard the case.
So, your statement was wrong. Just own up to it - you ran your mouth and were wrong. Or maybe just lying. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk it up to ignorance.
But someone who tried to stay in power after losing the presidency is fine and dandy?
He didn’t continue to protest it. After the court case. So I’ll chalk up you, just you, to the issue being that you’re just dumb. Has Trump continued to protest it? After the court caseS? It’s 4 years later and he still can’t come to grips with the fact he lost. And neither can you.
Now you're moving the goal post. He protested it until the SC ordered the voting starts, but that wasn't the Hillbillie's argument. I said he protested, and the Hillbillie said he didn't protest it. Just another lie Democrats like to tell.
If the SC had ruled on the 2020 election, you don't know what Trump would have done - that's the entire point.
There are many examples of Democrats who can't come to terms with the 2016 election, so stop the hypocrisy.
The King of moving goal posts speaks. You don’t fool anyone with your bad faith posts.
You truly are dumber than a rock. The SCOTUS couldn’t rule on it because every other fvcking court already had and he lost, wait for it, ALL of them. How dumb are you? Truly. Nobody tried to overturn the election. Do you understand the difference? It’s like talking to a wall.
You think the SC only hears cases ruled on by a lower court? Now who's dumber than a rock? They can rule on anything they want to.
You made the claim Gore didn't contest the election. He did. Just accept that you made an erroneous statement and move on.
