What would these geniuses have done if Gore had disputed the results of the 2000 election? Heads would’ve…..You are a moron.
I’ve changed my mind.
- Thread starter snarlcakes
- Start date
That’s Joehoopsier. You’ll pick up his language in time. He’s like our own David foster Wallace the day after a bender
He did dispute the results. Recounts were done - publicly. Ballots examined - publicly.
The SC heard the case.
You are not a serious poster.
Listen junior, when you have game like mine, ain't nobody got time for that spell checks crap. I play down hill, all the time. Get north to south, score the scalps and mount the knee caps on a board, before I get bored.
The counts weren’t “public”. They were certified just like they always are. In this case, genius, the SCOTUS wasn’t even needed. It didn’t make it beyond the initial court cases. You know why? Because there’s nothing there. The cases were dismissed. All of them. There’s ZERO evidence. In spite of whatever stupid $hit you’ve seen on YouTube or dip$hit articles claiming otherwise. Again, you really think Bill Barr wouldn’t have pursued any evidence of tampering or fraud or whatever?
Not a serious poster. I’m serious about this. You guys are either just really dumb or brainwashed. I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and say the latter. Watch some factual news. Realize that were there ANY truth to what you’re saying, Fox wouldn’t be out $788 million. There’s no truth to it. To any of it.
Get some help.
Last edited:
Gore protested the results and the SC heard the case.
So, your statement was wrong. Just own up to it - you ran your mouth and were wrong. Or maybe just lying. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk it up to ignorance.
But someone who tried to stay in power after losing the presidency is fine and dandy?
He didn’t continue to protest it. After the court case. So I’ll chalk up you, just you, to the issue being that you’re just dumb. Has Trump continued to protest it? After the court caseS? It’s 4 years later and he still can’t come to grips with the fact he lost. And neither can you.
Now you're moving the goal post. He protested it until the SC ordered the voting starts, but that wasn't the Hillbillie's argument. I said he protested, and the Hillbillie said he didn't protest it. Just another lie Democrats like to tell.
If the SC had ruled on the 2020 election, you don't know what Trump would have done - that's the entire point.
There are many examples of Democrats who can't come to terms with the 2016 election, so stop the hypocrisy.
The King of moving goal posts speaks. You don’t fool anyone with your bad faith posts.
You truly are dumber than a rock. The SCOTUS couldn’t rule on it because every other fvcking court already had and he lost, wait for it, ALL of them. How dumb are you? Truly. Nobody tried to overturn the election. Do you understand the difference? It’s like talking to a wall.
You think the SC only hears cases ruled on by a lower court? Now who's dumber than a rock? They can rule on anything they want to.
You made the claim Gore didn't contest the election. He did. Just accept that you made an erroneous statement and move on.
How will Bitcoin help during a financial crisis like 2008? Who would make those decisions? How would that even work?The money is broken and people don't understand economics. They know something is wrong, but incorrectly believe government can fix it (aka Democrats).
Epic post! "When you have game like mine" is classic. I've seen the gentleman you posted to get roasted time in and again on this thread, you have to give it to "junior" it keeps on keeping on.
You want to keep side stepping or admit it? The SCOTUS didn’t hear Trump’s case for election fraud because there was no case. You ready to admit that or you want to keep on exposing what a complete and utter moran you are? Gore didn’t keep claiming it after the courts had told him it was over. If I knew I needed to spell out what is patently obvious to everybody that’s not a dumba$$, I would’ve. I never took into account how dumb some of you….well, just you, are.
I’ll give it to you guys that you’re all completely delusional. But, when you’re in a cult (like you all are) then it’s to be expected. What say you? Did Trump lose a fair election in 2020?
Only a complete idiot would attempt to compare Gore's post-election (2000) conduct to Trump's. Take a bow.
Here's a quick history lesson, not that you'll understand any of it. In December 2000, the Supreme Court stopped the recount of the votes in Florida in what was an insanely close election. (Because of the closeness of the election, a recount was mandated pursuant to Florida statute and sanctioned by the Florida Supreme Court). Bush was declared the winner in Florida by a margin of 537 votes. Accordingly, he was awarded Florida's 25 electoral college votes and, in turn, the presidency.
Read Gore's concession speech that was delivered immediately after the Supreme Court's decision. It's a lesson in putting country above party, putting country above one's self-interest, respect for our democratic institutions and time-honored traditions, and being a gracious loser. These are concepts that are foreign to the POS you worship.
But Gore's concession speech wasn't the whole story. He called Bush to extend his congratulations and offered to meet with him as soon as possible in order to "heal the divisions of the campaign and contest through which we just passed . . . I say to President-elect Bush that what remains of partisan rancor must now be put aside, and may God bless his stewardship of this country."
Still more from Gore. He presided over the certification of the vote on January 6, 2001 that officially made Bush the winner, and he attended Bush's inauguration. It's hard to imagine how difficult that must have been, but he had the balls to admit he lost and he had respect for our constitution and the peaceful transfer of power.
Gore did things the right way. Trump did things his way, because he wasn't (and still isn't) man enough to admit he lost and because everything he does is based on self-interest. Complete piece of shit.
Last edited:
No single person, in the history of this country, has done more to divide this country, than Trump has. None
I've always picture Murt with a really great head of hair and a much better skin care routine than this guy.
Microneedling. And hair loss is a choice in 2024
Agreed, at least in the post-Civil War period.
A Brookings Institution report following Trump's presidency found him to be the most polarizing president - - by a wide margin.
And even if the discussion is expanded beyond the presidency, and with respect to the modern era, there's no individual who comes close in terms of divisiveness. George Wallace, in my view, is a distant second.
There wouldn’t be any bailouts. Those who were over leveraged would fail, instead of socializing the losses on the general public.
That needs to be addressed. There's no reason to take away a tool from the FED, especially one that has worked remarkably well.
The bailouts came from Congress, so I'm not sure how the FED socialized the losses? Unless, you're claiming that the resulting inflation was due to QE?
Maybe we should focus on why there's a need for bailouts, and why/how the bubbles were formed? I don't remember the depressions/finacial crises during the 50 years liberals were running the country...you know, back when America was great.
I want the FED to be abolished. It's a cancer.
I agree it was Congress.
The fiat system is the issue. There are always going to be bigger and bigger bubbles as they expand credit and debt. The regulations are just playing wack a mole.
Not sure what you are getting? Democrats had supermajorities in the 30s and things were a disaster.
I'm not sidestepping anything. I was responding to an erroneous post that Al Gore did not protest the results of the 2000 election.
This is the third time I've explained it. It's perfection obvious to anyone who isn't a dumbass.
Hilarious. The Democrats throw a temper tantrum, like 3 year old children, kick and scream and throw things, and then blame Trump for division.
I guess you think Abraham Lincoln had America singing kumbaya in 1861.
Sometimes, volunteer work leads to child support.
Everyone is willing to volunteer to help the lovely young lady get over her <insert emotional trauma>.
The Hugger is an excellent place to conduct a case study on this.
His opinion doesn’t matter (neither does mine by the way). Everyone needs Bitcoin. The current fiat system is akin to blood letting. It’s a terrible system and only causes more issues. Bitcoin is the best money, store of value, an ever invented.
The natural state of the free market is deflationary. The lives of people on a Bitcoin standard are getting cheaper and more affordable. Bitcoin is a litmus test for someone’s curiosity, intellect, and humility. Everyone gets the price they deserve.
NC alone has removed almost 1M people from its voter rolls since 2020. The rolls are probably even much worse in the really crooked states like NY, PA, MI, IL etc and almost all were sent mail in ballots. And we know the rejection rate was virtually 0. But keep up the lies.Based on the election workers I've known, I've no doubt that there is election integrity. There will always be human error but, as Bill Barr said, there was no evidence of widespread fraud that would change the election outcome.
Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud
WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.apnews.com
On the other hand, Trump was told his election fraud claims were false but he kept asserting them anyway without any proof.
Loading…
www.politico.com
Loading…
www.washingtonpost.com
It's one thing to have private reservations about something, but you guys are basically saying "there was fraud because I suspect there was fraud" and then demandimg public action be taken based only on your suspicions. That's not a "rational basis" as you claim.
Hell, your own post admits you are "speculating" and your suspicions "can never be proven."
Wonder how many of those purged were voters who had moved and temporarily were registered at two addresses with the purged registration being the old address.
Was a ward chairman many years ago. Had a great many apartment communities in my ward. Apartmemt dwellers tend to be highly tramsient so voters registered in more than one polling place was common. The potential threat of course being they could vote more than once.
Neither party was overly concerned about someone actually voting twice. Our focus back then for both parties was getting people registered and voter turnout, not purging.
What's really sad is the number of morons who think this is indicative of anything.
Bullshit!
All 747,000 of those "voters" were actually one person who was going to cast each vote for the Dem prez...but, not necessarily for any down ballot liberals. That was going to be a random process to throw geniuses like the tweeties Dmb follows/posts.
You should have seen the stink eye I got when I registered to vote in NC with my Florida driver's license.
I had to bring up an online bank statement and a water bill to prove my address. Then, when I voted right after in the Primary, some guy was hanging around me, making small talk, trying to find out my background.
I'm fine with it - I hope the do it to everyone who registers.
