What would these geniuses have done if Gore had disputed the results of the 2000 election? Heads would’ve…..You are a moron.
I’ve changed my mind.
- Thread starter snarlcakes
- Start date
That’s Joehoopsier. You’ll pick up his language in time. He’s like our own David foster Wallace the day after a bender
He did dispute the results. Recounts were done - publicly. Ballots examined - publicly.
The SC heard the case.
You are not a serious poster.
Listen junior, when you have game like mine, ain't nobody got time for that spell checks crap. I play down hill, all the time. Get north to south, score the scalps and mount the knee caps on a board, before I get bored.
The counts weren’t “public”. They were certified just like they always are. In this case, genius, the SCOTUS wasn’t even needed. It didn’t make it beyond the initial court cases. You know why? Because there’s nothing there. The cases were dismissed. All of them. There’s ZERO evidence. In spite of whatever stupid $hit you’ve seen on YouTube or dip$hit articles claiming otherwise. Again, you really think Bill Barr wouldn’t have pursued any evidence of tampering or fraud or whatever?
Not a serious poster. I’m serious about this. You guys are either just really dumb or brainwashed. I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and say the latter. Watch some factual news. Realize that were there ANY truth to what you’re saying, Fox wouldn’t be out $788 million. There’s no truth to it. To any of it.
Get some help.
Last edited:
Gore protested the results and the SC heard the case.
So, your statement was wrong. Just own up to it - you ran your mouth and were wrong. Or maybe just lying. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just chalk it up to ignorance.
But someone who tried to stay in power after losing the presidency is fine and dandy?
He didn’t continue to protest it. After the court case. So I’ll chalk up you, just you, to the issue being that you’re just dumb. Has Trump continued to protest it? After the court caseS? It’s 4 years later and he still can’t come to grips with the fact he lost. And neither can you.
Now you're moving the goal post. He protested it until the SC ordered the voting starts, but that wasn't the Hillbillie's argument. I said he protested, and the Hillbillie said he didn't protest it. Just another lie Democrats like to tell.
If the SC had ruled on the 2020 election, you don't know what Trump would have done - that's the entire point.
There are many examples of Democrats who can't come to terms with the 2016 election, so stop the hypocrisy.
The King of moving goal posts speaks. You don’t fool anyone with your bad faith posts.
You truly are dumber than a rock. The SCOTUS couldn’t rule on it because every other fvcking court already had and he lost, wait for it, ALL of them. How dumb are you? Truly. Nobody tried to overturn the election. Do you understand the difference? It’s like talking to a wall.
You think the SC only hears cases ruled on by a lower court? Now who's dumber than a rock? They can rule on anything they want to.
You made the claim Gore didn't contest the election. He did. Just accept that you made an erroneous statement and move on.
How will Bitcoin help during a financial crisis like 2008? Who would make those decisions? How would that even work?The money is broken and people don't understand economics. They know something is wrong, but incorrectly believe government can fix it (aka Democrats).
Epic post! "When you have game like mine" is classic. I've seen the gentleman you posted to get roasted time in and again on this thread, you have to give it to "junior" it keeps on keeping on.
You want to keep side stepping or admit it? The SCOTUS didn’t hear Trump’s case for election fraud because there was no case. You ready to admit that or you want to keep on exposing what a complete and utter moran you are? Gore didn’t keep claiming it after the courts had told him it was over. If I knew I needed to spell out what is patently obvious to everybody that’s not a dumba$$, I would’ve. I never took into account how dumb some of you….well, just you, are.
I’ll give it to you guys that you’re all completely delusional. But, when you’re in a cult (like you all are) then it’s to be expected. What say you? Did Trump lose a fair election in 2020?
Only a complete idiot would attempt to compare Gore's post-election (2000) conduct to Trump's. Take a bow.
Here's a quick history lesson, not that you'll understand any of it. In December 2000, the Supreme Court stopped the recount of the votes in Florida in what was an insanely close election. (Because of the closeness of the election, a recount was mandated pursuant to Florida statute and sanctioned by the Florida Supreme Court). Bush was declared the winner in Florida by a margin of 537 votes. Accordingly, he was awarded Florida's 25 electoral college votes and, in turn, the presidency.
Read Gore's concession speech that was delivered immediately after the Supreme Court's decision. It's a lesson in putting country above party, putting country above one's self-interest, respect for our democratic institutions and time-honored traditions, and being a gracious loser. These are concepts that are foreign to the POS you worship.
But Gore's concession speech wasn't the whole story. He called Bush to extend his congratulations and offered to meet with him as soon as possible in order to "heal the divisions of the campaign and contest through which we just passed . . . I say to President-elect Bush that what remains of partisan rancor must now be put aside, and may God bless his stewardship of this country."
Still more from Gore. He presided over the certification of the vote on January 6, 2001 that officially made Bush the winner, and he attended Bush's inauguration. It's hard to imagine how difficult that must have been, but he had the balls to admit he lost and he had respect for our constitution and the peaceful transfer of power.
Gore did things the right way. Trump did things his way, because he wasn't (and still isn't) man enough to admit he lost and because everything he does is based on self-interest. Complete piece of shit.
Last edited:
No single person, in the history of this country, has done more to divide this country, than Trump has. None
I've always picture Murt with a really great head of hair and a much better skin care routine than this guy.
Agreed, at least in the post-Civil War period.
A Brookings Institution report following Trump's presidency found him to be the most polarizing president - - by a wide margin.
And even if the discussion is expanded beyond the presidency, and with respect to the modern era, there's no individual who comes close in terms of divisiveness. George Wallace, in my view, is a distant second.
There wouldn’t be any bailouts. Those who were over leveraged would fail, instead of socializing the losses on the general public.
