No, I don't think it is. It doesn't matter who it is, it changes the dynamic of any home/home series. Even in conference games, this year's home team expected to have a home advantage they no longer do, and I don't see how that's any less fair. The bottom line is life isn't fair. This is an advantage to whoever isn't home this year, but it will be that way throughout all non-neutral site games this year for every team. That's just how it is; move on. Dumb to think you'd have to move every on campus game for this year. I think this was just your attempt to take a swipe at Cal. There are many legit reasons to do so; but imho, this isn't one.
Let me repeat. You are not to move every campus game. Listen and I will say it again. You do not have to move every campus game.......still. As I have been saying. I am hoping you read that this time and not repeat that same nonsense.
This is strictly around a non-conference rivalry game where the home/away contracts have considerable more meaning to them. Putting it at a neutral site keeps things even. Saying "Life isn't fair" could be used at literally ANY thing as a justification; however, there are opportunities such as going to a neutral site this year that then makes life fair. Hence the reason Coach Mack suggested it. UK could still keep their home game next year and for all intents and purposes, it moves what would be a neutral game 2 years from now, to the home game that would've taken place this year. To pretend that is not fair or disadvantageous to anyone is a straw house argument.