Breyer
- Thread starter bailey777
- Start date
Can YOU read more than one sentence in a post? I said "He objected to a black woman as a Federal judge and also an Hispanic.", explaining what I meant.
I said nothing about him complaining about the promise to nominate a woman - you are clearly flailing and just make shit up and claim I said something I never did.
I guess it's your turn to say you didn't really make it up.
Again, when you said, "You didn't, but he did," you were clearly referencing my post. You even quoted it. Again, if your intent was simply to reference the judges he opposed, fine, but then your comment makes little sense as a response to mine. Perhaps write more clearly.
Perhaps read what I write instead of trying to read into something that isn't there.
Perhaps admit when you are arguing just to argue.
You could have said, "Well, Biden didn't oppose the promise to name a woman, but he still did oppose individual female nominees, and I think that's relevant." But you didn't say that. Instead, you said Biden did "it," when the only "it" in question was opposing the promise to name a woman. I understood your post the only reasonable way there was to understand it. Not my fault you were unclear.
If you would have read what I actually posted, instead of reading in your own interpretation, I was quite clear.
Not my fault you are purposely misrepresenting what I said.
Tell you what. Since I'm so bad at reading, maybe just explicitly clear this up for me. Which part of my post that you quoted where you referring to when you said, "You didn't, but Biden did?"
I explained it in the next sentence, which I pointed out to you. This will be the 2nd time.
Care to go for the trifecta?
That next sentence wasn't in my post. So you were responding to something I didn't actually say, is that your contention?
No, the next sentence was in my post, which I put in to explain to you.
Congratulations, this is the third time I've had to explain it to you.
You seem to have misunderstood my question, since you haven't even answered it once, much less three times. Try again:
Which part of my post that you quoted where you referring to when you said, "You didn't, but Biden did?"
Again, that sentence wasn't part of my post. I shouldn't have to make this simple point multiple times. Which part of MY POST were you referring to?
You already admitted that wasn't part of my post. You simply can't answer, can you? And can't bring yourself to admit that you can't answer? Right?
Jayapal really out there trying to stage a revolution cause she has to pay $0.25 more for a Frappuchino.
I'm sure she's just looking out for McM
Someone needs to explain inflation to her.
YoU cAn PaY aN ExTrA qUaRtEr FoR yOuR cHeEsEbUrGeR....(but apparently not for your overpriced coffee sugar shake)
Seriously, whenever people argued that raising the minimum wage would raise prices, that was ALWAYS the reply, that the increase would be negligible and it was worth it. So now it happens and she proves that she doesn't understand how things work...at all. (And that isn't even taking into account that everything costs more now.)
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Pacers take it to Milwaukee tonight tie the series 1-1
- Latest: PhyloeBedoe
-
-
-