No...Final Fours definitely tell the story...just didn’t want to look up all that data.Hold on here..in your debate that Kentucky is the model program to emulate you dismissed me saying they have just one championship from their 8 billion one and done lottery picks with 'they've been to the final four a lot which is what counts'.
Now in this rebuttal you pull out the 'yeah but how many have won?'.
Oh and a those championships had maybe 3 or 4 one and done players.
Plus now we know their market value is $150k, plus cars (hello Mr Preston) plus housing plus a job and in return you get very little actual championship success and a hell of a lot of headache for the stars that you crave so much.
The reason for the big ten drought is not from having a lack of talent. We've gotten there by more teams than anyone. You're one and dones aren't winning championships.
The best experienced players are winning championships.
No Big Ten team has really competed for championships regularly since 2000 besides MSU. You have UM with a lucky run a couple years, OSU had a great 5-8 years, Wisky had a couple years, but the rest of the conference has been horrible. Completely a non factor for the most part on a national stage. A better conference would help all members.