ADVERTISEMENT

Where’s Clarence Thomas …and Ginny?

My employer and I talk about politics all the time… known him for twenty years, Jethro. Speaking of insufferable, you are by far the biggest jackass I have ever encountered on these boards in 20 years. If you are anything like you are on these boards. I feel bad for anyone who knows you. You’re the guy, just like your hero Trump , who everyone makes fun of behind your back and no one wants to sit by. If you ever go out, that is. Stop following me around. Stop your obsession. It’s weird. It’s creepy. It’s pathetic. Get a hobby. Or read an actual book. Try to think of an actual discussion or opinion, no matter how stupid, and do something besides insulting everyone you disagree with. You’re a pathetic little man .
Wow , sweetie . That was just so insightful. Someone stands up to up to you and you hurl insults. I am assuming'' Jethro '' was meant to be some bigotted racial insult? Quit posting your bullsh*t then! I love that I have gotten under your skin quite obviously. You somehow have this opinion you can post whatever you want to and no one else has the rights to not agree? My discussion opinions? You provide me with all I need. I don't post thinking no one has the right to disagree with me..............you do, fine but you are just something else . Do you ever really read what you post or actually have anything to back it up? I have stated many,many times I don't care for Trump as a person but like many others prefer his policy over a brain dead corpse you voted for. I absolutely love it if I managed to actually make you have to think for the first time in 20 years of posting? Call me the biggest jackass? I don't recall ever actually having to use words like that to describe you , correct me when you can quote me on anything to that degree. I've read more books that you have likely touched. You are simply too much fun ! You started posting political crap on the BB board which if you research I have repeatedly posted doesn't belong here.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: DANC and Bill4411
I know that was totally out of line, but I’ve had it. He’s now followed me over to the basketball boards to call me names.
There was nothing out of line with your perfectly civil post. I think goat was saying that some people here freely make fun of him to his face.

I have responded to cray a few times. For the most part interacting with him is just not my bag.
 
There was nothing out of line with your perfectly civil post. I think goat was saying that some people here freely make fun of him to his face.

I have responded to cray a few times. For the most part interacting with him is just not my bag.
You are fun too , nothing out of line using '' jethro '' as a epitaph? Seriously? That is just a start , not going into being called a jackass amongst other things . Just to clear up are you IUW Clurker or IUWC lurker because either one to quote Zeke is creepy as hell. WC would tend to mean a lurker in bathrooms known as WCs in the day and clurker just sets crime scene investigations off everywhere. Either one is creepy though
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Oh my. I posted an opinion piece by legal scholars and you’re telling me I’m posting misinformation? That’s really rich. What did I say that was misinformation. I asked why he didn’t have to recuse himself and said I thought he should. You have an awful lot of room to talk about politics and truth. Pot. Kettle.
Your continued demand to ignore the law is not helped by calling them “scholars.” I’ve spent my whole career shoving the real law down the throats of pompous legal “thinkers.”

The Supreme Court ruling is a FACT. Anyone, er, many, can read it. I linked it. You can read it or spout puppetry. Your choice.

I even linked your lefty liberal loons from PMSNBC to help y’all understand. I guess I can lead a propaganda puppet to truth, but I can’t make them read. (Hell, you can’t even ask them questions. Lefty Loons equate “I understand that“ with “I agree with that.” You can’t teach such “thinkers.”)

Just admit to yourself that you are uninterested in anything - especially reality - that is inconsistent with your preferred political conclusion.

Heal Thyself.

PS - Here’s another fact. SCOTUS rejected Trump’s argument (which damaged his January 6 argument) even though they didn’t have to. That’s another point inconsistent with the Constant Liberal Lie that all Republican SCOTUS appointees rule based on politics. The linked opinion explains why the Court felt this was not an appropriate case for SCOTUS and won’t be precedent. They ruled based on LAW, not Trump. Unlike the Loony Left, Trump doesn’t control their every thought. Won’t read that in the “scholarly” press.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: DANC and Crayfish57
I think this topic is pretty simple.

If you think Ginny Thomas' texts are very relevant to Clarence Thomas' job, but you don't think Hunter Biden's laptop is very relevant to Joe Biden's job, you are probably a political hack.

If you think Hunter Biden's laptop is very relevant to Joe Biden's job, but you don't think Ginny Thomas' texts are very relevant to Clarence Thomas' job, you are probably a political hack.
Great comparison. If President Biden is calling Hunter for advice, we have a problem. Otherwise I do not care. If Justice Thomas is asking his wife how he should rule, we have a problem. Otherwise it is her problem and not his. She might be fair game to ask about that day and any role she may have played, but not him.
 
To: Zeke and Cray,

Why do you two bother with each other? You are NEVER going to change the other's opinions/political stance.

How about a cage match to the death? Many here would pay big money to see that.
 
To: Zeke and Cray,

Why do you two bother with each other? You are NEVER going to change the other's opinions/political stance.

How about a cage match to the death? Many here would pay big money to see that.
I never respond to him when he’s talking about anything but me. I’ve had him on ignore for months. He continues to stalk me, even over on the basketball boards in his creepy little personal vendetta. I only know he’s talking about me because I read it in other’s responses. I apologize to the board. I’ve never had a problem with anyone since this board began in the 90s.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57 and DANC
Lol, sure thing Danny Boy. Tell me which party is driving around in their big old trucks crying about mandate, or masks, or whatever their problem is these days. Tell me which party still can’t accept an election that was a year and a half ago. Try again, Danno.
Changing the subject? Why? Do you have trouble focusing?

Why are you against freedome of speech?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
I never respond to him when he’s talking about anything but me. I’ve had him on ignore for months. He continues to stalk me, even over on the basketball boards in his creepy little personal vendetta. I only know he’s talking about me because I read it in other’s responses. I apologize to the board. I’ve never had a problem with anyone since this board began in the 90s.
You've had a problem with anyone who disagrees with you. You can't have an honest discussion with anyone without resorting to Democrat talking points.

You are the female version of Hickory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
My employer and I talk about politics all the time… known him for twenty years, Jethro. Speaking of insufferable, you are by far the biggest jackass I have ever encountered on these boards in 20 years. If you are anything like you are on these boards. I feel bad for anyone who knows you. You’re the guy, just like your hero Trump , who everyone makes fun of behind your back and no one wants to sit by. If you ever go out, that is. Stop following me around. Stop your obsession. It’s weird. It’s creepy. It’s pathetic. Get a hobby. Or read an actual book. Try to think of an actual discussion or opinion, no matter how stupid, and do something besides insulting everyone you disagree with. You’re a pathetic little man .
Trump Trump Trump 24X7

What would you do without him?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Crayfish57
I think this topic is pretty simple.

If you think Ginny Thomas' texts are very relevant to Clarence Thomas' job, but you don't think Hunter Biden's laptop is very relevant to Joe Biden's job, you are probably a political hack.

If you think Hunter Biden's laptop is very relevant to Joe Biden's job, but you don't think Ginny Thomas' texts are very relevant to Clarence Thomas' job, you are probably a political hack.
Ginny may be relevant to Thomas' job, but there is no evidence to indicate it influences any of his decisions.

Hunter's e-mails, on the other hand, show that Joe was being paid while he was Vice President by Hunter's deals.

Ginny breaks no laws. Hunter has lied on his gun application and is obviously guilty of influence peddling and not being registered as a lobbyist.

Their situations couldn't be more different. You can try to create a comparison, but you've failed.
 
Changing the subject? Why? Do you have trouble focusing?

Why are you against freedome of speech?
Dan his attacks upon her go beyond any type of normal discussion or behavior. He does seem to be stalking her.
 
Dan his attacks upon her go beyond any type of normal discussion or behavior. He does seem to be stalking her.
If that's true, you haven't seen how I've been stalked by her and others.

She's can ignore him and be done with it. But she always responds. Always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
If that's true, you haven't seen how I've been stalked by her and others.

She's can ignore him and be done with it. But she always responds. Always.
Could be but he really does have some pretty bad personal attacks when it comes to her.
 
Could be but he really does have some pretty bad personal attacks when it comes to her.
Do you ever read her posts? She gives as good as she takes.

She's just upset that anyone challenges her because she can't respond with her own thoughts - she has none. Just try arguing with her about anything without her bringing up Trump. It's all she's got.
 
Do you ever read her posts? She gives as good as she takes.

She's just upset that anyone challenges her because she can't respond with her own thoughts - she has none. Just try arguing with her about anything without her bringing up Trump. It's all she's got.
I was struck by his posts saying he really didn't like her making it more personal than responding to her arguments.
 
Do you ever read her posts? She gives as good as she takes.

She's just upset that anyone challenges her because she can't respond with her own thoughts - she has none. Just try arguing with her about anything without her bringing up Trump. It's all she's got.
Nonsense. There’s multiple posts on here where Trump isn’t mentioned. I have discussions with many people on here who don’t believe as I do. And I don’t get personal, FYI.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
If that's true, you haven't seen how I've been stalked by her and others.

She's can ignore him and be done with it. But she always responds. Always.
Oh please. I’ve never brought you up in a post randomly, only when I’m responding to you. I don’t take any argument we have here over to the basketball boards.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Ginny may be relevant to Thomas' job, but there is no evidence to indicate it influences any of his decisions.

Hunter's e-mails, on the other hand, show that Joe was being paid while he was Vice President by Hunter's deals.

Ginny breaks no laws. Hunter has lied on his gun application and is obviously guilty of influence peddling and not being registered as a lobbyist.

Their situations couldn't be more different. You can try to create a comparison, but you've failed.
We already knew you were a political hack.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Oh please. I’ve never brought you up in a post randomly, only when I’m responding to you. I don’t take any argument we have here over to the basketball boards.
Well that's a lie.
 
Nonsense. There’s multiple posts on here where Trump isn’t mentioned. I have discussions with many people on here who don’t believe as I do. And I don’t get personal, FYI.
Are you shitting me? Really? I just pointed out in this thread where you brought up Trump when he wasn't the subject.

Do multiple posters share your handle?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Lucy01
I was struck by his posts saying he really didn't like her making it more personal than responding to her arguments.
Do you actually read what she posts? She is the one that brought politics to the basketball board about Fife. I am an equal rights all the way person, you apparently are of the thinking because she is a woman she can post whatever and it should get some special treatment. Is it that or you both have family farms getting too much money from the government? She is politics 24/7 wherever she posts and dare not challenge her on it? Grow up Bill
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Do you actually read what she posts? She is the one that brought politics to the basketball board about Fife. I am an equal rights all th way person, you apparently are of the thinking because she is a woman she can post whatever and it should get some special treatment. Is it that or you both have family farms getting too much money from the government? She is politics 24/7 wherever she posts and dare not challenge her on it? Grow up Bill
Yeah, that was some bullshit she posted about Fife.
 
Do you actually read what she posts? She is the one that brought politics to the basketball board about Fife. I am an equal rights all the way person, you apparently are of the thinking because she is a woman she can post whatever and it should get some special treatment. Is it that or you both have family farms getting too much money from the government? She is politics 24/7 wherever she posts and dare not challenge her on it? Grow up Bill
I would suggest you consider a little self- reflection as well.
 
Fair enough. I'm not a moderator.
Everything she posts is 24/7 far left politics and then gets offended when someone has a different view and Yes, I don't like the fact she is a teacher because I damn well know she pushes that on her students.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Harry Hondo
Fair enough. I'm not a moderator.
Sorry to drag you in this. Feel free to check the free board. People asked what Rabby said and I told them. Checking out now, they can say what they want.
 
Everything she posts is 24/7 far left politics and then gets offended when someone has a different view and Yes, I don't like the fact she is a teacher because I damn well know she pushes that on her students.
It’s funny what gets referred to as “far left” nowadays. What’s that old saying..“if you’re a hammer everything looks like a nail.”
 
David Brock, who came up with the phrase describing Anita Hill as “A little bit nutty and a little bit slutty”, and at the time was working for Richard Mellon Scaife…said Clarence Thomas told him personally that all the porn stuff was true. Not only that, but he wasn’t the least ashamed of it.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: iuwclurker and DANC
David Brock, who came up with the phrase describing Anita Hill as “A little bit nutty and a little bit slutty”, and at the time was working for Richard Mellon Scaife…said Clarence Thomas told him personally that all the porn stuff was true. Not only that, but he wasn’t the least ashamed of it.
So its true.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Lucy01 and DANC
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT