ADVERTISEMENT

Vivek is the most Presidential

As someone said the other day...

DANC all up in his feelz:
crying-baby.gif
That's rich coming from a member of the perpetual victim party (democrat). You just can't make this sh!t up. It's hilarious.
 
You're describing the AOTF to a tee. You should check out the current scholarly discussion about soft porn being blocked in various users browsers and the technology behind it.

The thread is entitled "Friday Funnies". Don't let the title fool you. We get right down to the nitty gritty.
LOL AOTF is for boobs, and boobs only. Both in the person and mammary definitions.
 
LOL AOTF is for boobs, and boobs only. Both in the person and mammary definitions.
Your tone suggests that this is a bad thing. This bothers me quite a bit and I'm going to have to ask for a trigger warning as we move forward on any direct replies that may disparage bewbs.
 
I’m shocked that you would think this.

Meanwhile we’ve seen written here by reasonable liberals:

Trump licks Putin’s balls.
Trump licks/kisses Putin’s ass
Trump is a Russian agent/asset.
Trumpists
Trumpbots
Say something positive about Trump and you are a Trump ball licker/ass licker
Trump will end democracy
cult followers
Malinia is a slut

Thats just for warmup.
Don't forget the Orange Turd. So classy.

Trump would start WWIII. Now that's a knee-slapper!
 
Your tone suggests that this is a bad thing. This bothers me quite a bit and I'm going to have to ask for a trigger warning as we move forward on any direct replies that may disparage bewbs.
Not at all. The world needs a place to be, and view, boobs. I realize your high status there and meant no disrespect.

You haven't changed pronouns lately, have you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hookyIU1990
We have discussed how policy has impacted inflation in the US a thousand times. Just like cori bush and blm. Do you have a brain injury? Do you work for the dnc? Why do you do this? Do you think we forget? What is your deal? Seriously? This isn’t normal posting. It’s like you have an agenda. You work for the party. Or you are one of the dumbest mfers I have ever read
Ding! Ding! Ding!
 
I see you're responding to a guy whose next post with content will be his first.

I put him on ignore a long time ago - I recommend you do the same for trolls like him.
Poppa DANC…looking out for his featherweight followers.
BTW, if I’m on ignore, how do you know the content of my posts?
🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
I would be sad, but it is our history. Most people of the day couldn't read, so Common Sense and Federalist Papers were read by a select few I will call "the elite" and not the masses.

I had a buddy do his dissertation on common soldiers in the Civil War. It proved very difficult, very few could write. So finding first person sources was difficult. Plenty of officers could, but only so much could be officers griping about the men.
I was curious about this from your post and looked it up. I had forgotten that the Federalist essays were published only in NY newspapers during the ratification debate in the states, and were directed at NY voters (NY barely ratified).
 
I would be sad, but it is our history. Most people of the day couldn't read, so Common Sense and Federalist Papers were read by a select few I will call "the elite" and not the masses.

I had a buddy do his dissertation on common soldiers in the Civil War. It proved very difficult, very few could write. So finding first person sources was difficult. Plenty of officers could, but only so much could be officers griping about the men.
Reading the journals of the men with the Corps of Discovery is bad enough. Part of the selection criteria was that they could keep a journal. Can't imagine what it was like reading what he actually uncovered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin the Martian
I was curious about this from your post and looked it up. I had forgotten that the Federalist essays were published only in NY newspapers during the ratification debate in the states, and were directed at NY voters (NY barely ratified).
Right, and voters were landed White males. That was a group with highest literacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_6hv78pr714xta
Googled, went to his presidential site. Opened up to a donation page and there sits "if you want to defeat wokeism". Pretty A+ pandering right there.

I get it is popular, but I would hope a serious candidate would lead with a serious topic.
So vote for Biden again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC


This guy is a clown. “Truth” with no context
Just heard today he is not for continuing the US's 'special relationship' with Israel.

That's a deal-breaker for me.

I do agree the government lied, and continues to lie, about Hunter.

There's a difference between lying and fvcking up in Iraq and being surprised by Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

9/11 conspiracy theories are just stupid. Again, intelligence agencies' incompetence doesn't equal conspiracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
Just heard today he is not for continuing the US's 'special relationship' with Israel.

That's a deal-breaker for me.

I do agree the government lied, and continues to lie, about Hunter.

There's a difference between lying and fvcking up in Iraq and being surprised by Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

9/11 conspiracy theories are just stupid. Again, intelligence agencies' incompetence doesn't equal conspiracy.
Withdrawing from the world stage is idiotic
 
Just heard today he is not for continuing the US's 'special relationship' with Israel.

That's a deal-breaker for me.

I do agree the government lied, and continues to lie, about Hunter.

There's a difference between lying and fvcking up in Iraq and being surprised by Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

9/11 conspiracy theories are just stupid. Again, intelligence agencies' incompetence doesn't equal conspiracy.

All I've seen is he said Israel should not get more aid than other countries we give to around that region. While this is not what I would like to hear you would think two things could occur. That could change depending on congressional appropriations and intel he has not seen yet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Just heard today he is not for continuing the US's 'special relationship' with Israel.

That's a deal-breaker for me.

I do agree the government lied, and continues to lie, about Hunter.

There's a difference between lying and fvcking up in Iraq and being surprised by Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

9/11 conspiracy theories are just stupid. Again, intelligence agencies' incompetence doesn't equal conspiracy.
Did he say it would be only "temporary"? Most everything he proposes would be "temporary," without every explaining why his great ideas should only be "temporary."

Even his stance of strengthening U.S. presence around Taiwan is only temporary. Once the U.S. has sufficient semiconductor manufacturing to no long be dependent on Taiwan, he would let China take over Taiwan.

He also wants to implement a "civics test" for anyone between 18-25 that wants to vote - unless they serve 6 months in the military or as a first responder.
 
Did he say it would be only "temporary"? Most everything he proposes would be "temporary," without every explaining why his great ideas should only be "temporary."

Even his stance of strengthening U.S. presence around Taiwan is only temporary. Once the U.S. has sufficient semiconductor manufacturing to no long be dependent on Taiwan, he would let China take over Taiwan.

He also wants to implement a "civics test" for anyone between 18-25 that wants to vote - unless they serve 6 months in the military or as a first responder.
I don't necessarily disagree with things like a civics test, personally, but there's no way that would fly.

He comes across as sharp and very intelligent (obviously he is), but some of his ideas and plans are nutty. If he ever gets any traction, the media will eat him alive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
All I've seen is he said Israel should not get more aid than other countries we give to around that region. While this is not what I would like to hear you would think two things could occur. That could change depending on congressional appropriations and intel he has not seen yet.
Right. It's easy to say things like that without knowing the real deal.

To me, it's pandering to Trump voters, of which I may be one, but Trump didn't go that far.
 
I don't necessarily disagree with things like a civics test, personally, but there's no way that would fly.

He comes across as sharp and very intelligent (obviously he is), but some of his ideas and plans are nutty. If he ever gets any traction, the media will eat him alive.
On the civics test, his campaign has acknowledged it would take a constitutional amendment to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
I’m shocked that you would think this.

Meanwhile we’ve seen written here by reasonable liberals:

Trump licks Putin’s balls.
Trump licks/kisses Putin’s ass
Trump is a Russian agent/asset.
Trumpists
Trumpbots
Say something positive about Trump and you are a Trump ball licker/ass licker
Trump will end democracy
cult followers
Malinia is a slut

Thats just for warmup.
I haven't seen any of the more crude examples you mentioned (ones about licking or saying derogatory comments about Trump's wife), but I have seen plenty of comments about the MAGA crowd resembling - or flat out being - a cult. Shoot, I've said that. It's hard not to believe that when people will say out loud that they trust Trump more than their families or religious leaders.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT