Guilty. I enjoy hyping Kennedy. I would vote for Kennedy over Trump or any Republican candidate that was against Bitcoin.
I don’t know much about Kemp. I know he did a good job with Covid and that’s about it. I obviously prefer him over Trump, but that’s not saying much.
I don’t understand why this is a problem for you. There are several candidates (and non-candidates) that i would be comfortable in “hyping”. There is a lot of quality to choose from besides B and T.
I used is Google's algorithm biased against conservatives.
www.porternovelli.com
What a novel concept, to seek information about candidates, have discussion, form opinions, & be open to making a decision or changing your mind as you learn more about them. I suppose you’re already locked in today regardless of what info becomes available or what you see from a candidate.🙄
And you'd be wrong . . . still. Just like you have always been.
thehill.com
This is a Republican I could vote for.I'm thinking of donating $20 to this guy, one dollar at a time.
ND governor paying people to donate to his presidential campaign
North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum (R) announced gift cards as an incentive for donations to his 2024 presidential campaign Monday afternoon. In a series of Twitter posts, Burgum said the first 50…
I'm not saying I want to vote for a Republican, but if I had to, it would be a guy like that.
Good point. I just looked back. You know how many liberals used the term "Trumpflation" on this forum? Only one. IGW (of course). That was it. No one else did it.
Comes with the territory. Joe needs to hope the economy continues to improve and then sell Bidenomics. He's going to get saddled with any weaknesses, so he better demand credit for the strengths.
To be fair, inflation wasn't an issue under Trump.
I don’t think you can measure bias by looking at liberal vs conservative material.I used is Google's algorithm biased against conservatives.
Below is an interesting study by the Economist. It is paywalled, but you can see the graphics. One graphic shows various political sites and their return by Google. Yes, InfoWars and Kos are both biased against. Info Wars is more likely returned than Kos, but both are returned less than most other.
NPR and NY Post are virtually identical in their returns in searches. CNN is returned a bit more than Fox, but it isn't a crazy amount on the chart.
Forbes and Fortune are returned the most. I will say that Forbes' placement seems accurate, I seldom do a search that Forbes isn't returned toward the top.
Google rewards reputable reporting, not left-wing politics
Our statistical study revealed no evidence of ideological bias in the search engine’s news tabwww.economist.com
This guy discusses the issue as someone whose professional job is to boost Google returns:
Is Google biased? Sort of, but how and why? - Porter Novelli
Here we go again. The Mail has conducted an audit of ten search terms relating to Boris Johnson and concluded […]
Interesting that he says more conservative sites are paywalled than liberal sites. Since Google can't necessarily scan WSJ, it can't see who it links to. It also can't follow links to WSJ. So WSJ will score lower and other conservative sites will score lower because WSJ is paywalled.
NYT is also paywalled and is also returned below the bell curve. As he points out, liberal positions are helped that government sites and university sites are almost never behind a paywall. So all those universities doing research on climate change (and government agencies) contribute positive scores to one another.
Reuters scores very high in factual accuracy and isn't returned as much as it should be. I wonder why? I am guessing media sites pick up Reuters stories and return them with the byline but not with the link. So it isn't getting linked to. Just Googling Reuters returns a lot of other media quoting Reuters, but not linking.
I'm sure you won't like the Economist link, but I find it fascinating. I once was involved in similar work, I was charged both with improving our Google score and with getting email past spam filters. In many ways, the two items are very similar. I didn't have the Google expertise that the real pros have (but I sadly had it at beating spam filters), but there is a lot of public information out there to give one a fighting chance with Google. The problem is so many are trying to maximize Google returns. Sites that don't play the game at all come back on page 23 of your search. That may be your example of wind and solar. We literally would find other places doing similar work and ask them to link us if we linked them in an effort to build both our scores. We weren't selling products per se, we were trying to get out information. Think how a convention and visitor's bureau wants information about events out.
Who was the heavy weight? I mean I am pretty hefty but I doubt Google would return my opinions on AGW😃
I’m shocked that you would think this.
Maybe now, but not before Trump so much. Definitely not before Obama. There was a ton of lib crazy then with countless conspiracy theories.
Economy started tanking under Trump due to covid. Inflation followed across the globe as the markets adjusted to global shortages and the recovery that followed.
We have discussed how policy has impacted inflation in the US a thousand times. Just like cori bush and blm. Do you have a brain injury? Do you work for the dnc? Why do you do this? Do you think we forget? What is your deal? Seriously? This isn’t normal posting. It’s like you have an agenda. You work for the party. Or you are one of the dumbest mfers I have ever read
I've seen your base. It is impressive and solid. Maybe the most impressive and solid base ever.
Google this exact phrase
This is some Cosmic-level posting, right here. lol
If you can't make a point without writing a novel, that's not good communication.
You're describing the AOTF to a tee. You should check out the current scholarly discussion about soft porn being blocked in various users browsers and the technology behind it.
This is way way too many words. You suck 😁
Can’t
